How attributions of coproduction motives shape customer relationships over time.

IF 9.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Pub Date : 2023-01-14 DOI:10.1007/s11747-022-00910-6
Pascal Güntürkün, Till Haumann, Laura Marie Edinger-Schons, Jan Wieseke
{"title":"How attributions of coproduction motives shape customer relationships over time.","authors":"Pascal Güntürkün, Till Haumann, Laura Marie Edinger-Schons, Jan Wieseke","doi":"10.1007/s11747-022-00910-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the proliferation of coproduction concepts in various B2C contexts, knowledge on how coproduction shapes customer relationships is still surprisingly limited, as prior studies find mixed results and are bound to a short-term perspective. The present study addresses these limitations by providing first insights into the underlying psychological processes that explain differences in the short- and long-term relationship consequences of positive and negative coproduction perceptions. Drawing from the multiple inference model, this research shows how customers' ambivalent attributions of a firm's coproduction motives (i.e., firm-serving and customer-serving) affect customer satisfaction, willingness to pay, and spending behavior over time. The results of a latent growth analysis based on a longitudinal field study (n<sub>1</sub> = 12,662; six waves) show that coproduction can harm customer relationships in the long-run, as the detrimental effects of firm-serving motive attributions are temporally more persistent than the favorable but ephemeral effects of customer-serving motive attributions. An additional experiment (n<sub>2</sub> = 931) and field study (n<sub>3</sub> = 360) confirm the generalizability of the key findings and provide new managerial insights into how firm-specific characteristics of a coproduction concept (i.e., coproduction intensity, design freedom, monetary savings) influence customer attributions different coproduction motives and thereby shape customer relationships over time.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11747-022-00910-6.</p>","PeriodicalId":17194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science","volume":" ","pages":"1-29"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9839446/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-022-00910-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the proliferation of coproduction concepts in various B2C contexts, knowledge on how coproduction shapes customer relationships is still surprisingly limited, as prior studies find mixed results and are bound to a short-term perspective. The present study addresses these limitations by providing first insights into the underlying psychological processes that explain differences in the short- and long-term relationship consequences of positive and negative coproduction perceptions. Drawing from the multiple inference model, this research shows how customers' ambivalent attributions of a firm's coproduction motives (i.e., firm-serving and customer-serving) affect customer satisfaction, willingness to pay, and spending behavior over time. The results of a latent growth analysis based on a longitudinal field study (n1 = 12,662; six waves) show that coproduction can harm customer relationships in the long-run, as the detrimental effects of firm-serving motive attributions are temporally more persistent than the favorable but ephemeral effects of customer-serving motive attributions. An additional experiment (n2 = 931) and field study (n3 = 360) confirm the generalizability of the key findings and provide new managerial insights into how firm-specific characteristics of a coproduction concept (i.e., coproduction intensity, design freedom, monetary savings) influence customer attributions different coproduction motives and thereby shape customer relationships over time.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11747-022-00910-6.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共同生产动机的归因如何随着时间的推移影响客户关系。
尽管共同生产的概念在各种 B2C 环境中不断涌现,但有关共同生产如何塑造客户关系的知识仍然有限得令人吃惊,因为之前的研究发现的结果喜忧参半,而且都局限于短期视角。针对这些局限性,本研究首次深入探讨了解释积极和消极共同生产认知对短期和长期关系影响差异的潜在心理过程。通过多重推理模型,本研究展示了顾客对企业共同生产动机(即企业服务型和顾客服务型)的矛盾归因是如何随着时间的推移影响顾客满意度、支付意愿和消费行为的。基于纵向实地研究(n1=12,662;六波)的潜在增长分析结果表明,从长远来看,共同生产会损害客户关系,因为企业服务动机归因的不利影响在时间上比客户服务动机归因的有利但短暂的影响更持久。额外的实验(n2 = 931)和实地研究(n3 = 360)证实了主要研究结果的普遍性,并为管理者提供了新的见解,即共同生产概念的特定企业特征(即共同生产强度、设计自由度、货币节约)如何影响客户对不同共同生产动机的归因,从而随着时间的推移塑造客户关系:在线版本包含补充材料,可查阅 10.1007/s11747-022-00910-6。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
30.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: JAMS, also known as The Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, plays a crucial role in bridging the gap between scholarly research and practical application in the realm of marketing. Its primary objective is to study and enhance marketing practices by publishing research-driven articles. When manuscripts are submitted to JAMS for publication, they are evaluated based on their potential to contribute to the advancement of marketing science and practice.
期刊最新文献
There is business like show business! What marketing scholars and managers can learn from 40 years of entertainment science research Expressions of customer rumination in online posts and firm responses Purpose orientation: An emerging theory transforming business for a better world Shifting focus in the fight against core environmental challenges Crossing incentive alignment and adaptive designs in choice-based conjoint: A fruitful endeavor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1