Use of Peer- and Self-Evaluation to Improve Conversations with Interfacility Referring Clinicians.

Q3 Medicine Wisconsin Medical Journal Pub Date : 2022-12-01
Anika Nelson, Svetlana Melamed, Sarah Corey Bauer, Erin Preloger, Kelsey Porada, Jennifer Hadjiev
{"title":"Use of Peer- and Self-Evaluation to Improve Conversations with Interfacility Referring Clinicians.","authors":"Anika Nelson,&nbsp;Svetlana Melamed,&nbsp;Sarah Corey Bauer,&nbsp;Erin Preloger,&nbsp;Kelsey Porada,&nbsp;Jennifer Hadjiev","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pediatric hospital medicine physicians receive little formal training in communicating with interfacility referring clinicians. We sought to improve pediatric hospital medicine physician confidence and communication scores by 10% during patient triage calls from interfacility referring providers via a continuing professional development initiative.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-center 10-month quality improvement project. Confidence was assessed via survey before and after the initiative. A novel self- and peer-evaluation tool was used to assess accepting pediatric hospital medicine physician communication on recorded calls. Call assessment scores were measured at baseline, cycle 1, and cycle 2. Interventions included group discussion and development of a scripting flowsheet.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty pediatric hospital medicine physicians participated and completed a total of 203 call assessments. From baseline to post-initiative, general confidence communicating with referring clinicians increased by 13% (mean ranks 11.8, 16.8, respectively), and specific confidence communicating when there is a difference of opinion increased significantly by 37% (mean ranks 9.8, 19.2, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Interfacility transfer conversation evaluation scores increased by 11%.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our initiative improved accepting physician's confidence and communication evaluation scores using self- and peer-evaluation, group reflection, and a scripting flowsheet. Self- and peer-evaluation of recorded calls can be an effective intervention for building physician confidence in communicating with referring clinicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":38747,"journal":{"name":"Wisconsin Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wisconsin Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Pediatric hospital medicine physicians receive little formal training in communicating with interfacility referring clinicians. We sought to improve pediatric hospital medicine physician confidence and communication scores by 10% during patient triage calls from interfacility referring providers via a continuing professional development initiative.

Methods: We conducted a single-center 10-month quality improvement project. Confidence was assessed via survey before and after the initiative. A novel self- and peer-evaluation tool was used to assess accepting pediatric hospital medicine physician communication on recorded calls. Call assessment scores were measured at baseline, cycle 1, and cycle 2. Interventions included group discussion and development of a scripting flowsheet.

Results: Twenty pediatric hospital medicine physicians participated and completed a total of 203 call assessments. From baseline to post-initiative, general confidence communicating with referring clinicians increased by 13% (mean ranks 11.8, 16.8, respectively), and specific confidence communicating when there is a difference of opinion increased significantly by 37% (mean ranks 9.8, 19.2, P < 0.001). Interfacility transfer conversation evaluation scores increased by 11%.

Discussion: Our initiative improved accepting physician's confidence and communication evaluation scores using self- and peer-evaluation, group reflection, and a scripting flowsheet. Self- and peer-evaluation of recorded calls can be an effective intervention for building physician confidence in communicating with referring clinicians.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用同伴和自我评价来改善与机构间转诊临床医生的对话。
简介:儿科医院的内科医生在与机构间转诊临床医生沟通方面接受的正规培训很少。通过持续的专业发展计划,我们试图将儿科医院内科医生的信心和沟通分数在医院间转诊提供者的病人分诊电话中提高10%。方法:开展单中心10个月质量改善项目。信心是通过行动前后的调查评估的。一种新颖的自我和同行评价工具被用来评估接受儿科医院医学医师在录音通话中的沟通。在基线、周期1和周期2测量Call评估评分。干预措施包括小组讨论和脚本流程图的开发。结果:20名儿科医院内科医师参与并完成呼叫评估203次。从基线到倡议后,与转诊医生的一般信心沟通增加了13%(平均排名分别为11.8和16.8),当存在意见分歧时的具体信心沟通显著增加了37%(平均排名为9.8和19.2,P)。讨论:我们的倡议通过自我和同行评价、小组反思和脚本流程图提高了接受医生的信心和沟通评估得分。电话录音的自我和同行评价可以有效地干预建立医师与转诊临床医生沟通的信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Wisconsin Medical Journal
Wisconsin Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: The Wisconsin Medical Society is the largest association of medical doctors in the state with more than 12,000 members dedicated to the best interests of their patients. With that in mind, wisconsinmedicalsociety.org offers patients a unique source for reliable, physician-reviewed medical information. The Wisconsin Medical Society has been a trusted source for health policy leadership since 1841.
期刊最新文献
Age-Appropriate Cancer Screenings Through a Dermatology Len. Stem Cell Science and Regenerative Biology: Tools for Building New Treatments. Amiodarone Pharmacovigilance Through an Intelligent Electronic Health Record Application. Assessment of Uterine Fibroid Knowledge and Educational Interests Among Health Care Professionals. An Unusual Presentation of Blastomycosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1