Venlafaxine XR treatment for older patients with major depressive disorder: decision trees for when to change treatment.

IF 6.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Evidence Based Mental Health Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1136/ebmental-2022-300479
Helena Kyunghee Kim, Daniel M Blumberger, Jordan F Karp, Eric Lenze, Charles F Reynolds, Benoit H Mulsant
{"title":"Venlafaxine XR treatment for older patients with major depressive disorder: decision trees for when to change treatment.","authors":"Helena Kyunghee Kim,&nbsp;Daniel M Blumberger,&nbsp;Jordan F Karp,&nbsp;Eric Lenze,&nbsp;Charles F Reynolds,&nbsp;Benoit H Mulsant","doi":"10.1136/ebmental-2022-300479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Predictors of antidepressant response in older patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) need to be confirmed before they can guide treatment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To create decision trees for early identification of older patients with MDD who are unlikely to respond to 12 weeks of antidepressant treatment, we analysed data from 454 older participants treated with venlafaxine XR (150-300 mg/day) for up to 12 weeks in the Incomplete Response in Late-Life Depression: Getting to Remission study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We selected the earliest decision point when we could detect participants who had not yet responded (defined as >50% symptom improvement) but would do so after 12 weeks of treatment. Using receiver operating characteristic models, we created two decision trees to minimise either false identification of future responders (false positives) or false identification of future non-responders (false negatives). These decision trees integrated baseline characteristics and treatment response at the early decision point as predictors.</p><p><strong>Finding: </strong>We selected week 4 as the optimal early decision point. Both decision trees shared minimal symptom reduction at week 4, longer episode duration and not having responded to an antidepressant previously as predictors of non-response. Test negative predictive values of the leftmost terminal node of the two trees were 77.4% and 76.6%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our decision trees have the potential to guide treatment in older patients with MDD but they require to be validated in other larger samples.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Once confirmed, our findings may be used to guide changes in antidepressant treatment in older patients with poor early response.</p>","PeriodicalId":12233,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Mental Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134194/pdf/ebmental-2022-300479.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence Based Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmental-2022-300479","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Predictors of antidepressant response in older patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) need to be confirmed before they can guide treatment.

Objective: To create decision trees for early identification of older patients with MDD who are unlikely to respond to 12 weeks of antidepressant treatment, we analysed data from 454 older participants treated with venlafaxine XR (150-300 mg/day) for up to 12 weeks in the Incomplete Response in Late-Life Depression: Getting to Remission study.

Methods: We selected the earliest decision point when we could detect participants who had not yet responded (defined as >50% symptom improvement) but would do so after 12 weeks of treatment. Using receiver operating characteristic models, we created two decision trees to minimise either false identification of future responders (false positives) or false identification of future non-responders (false negatives). These decision trees integrated baseline characteristics and treatment response at the early decision point as predictors.

Finding: We selected week 4 as the optimal early decision point. Both decision trees shared minimal symptom reduction at week 4, longer episode duration and not having responded to an antidepressant previously as predictors of non-response. Test negative predictive values of the leftmost terminal node of the two trees were 77.4% and 76.6%, respectively.

Conclusion: Our decision trees have the potential to guide treatment in older patients with MDD but they require to be validated in other larger samples.

Clinical implications: Once confirmed, our findings may be used to guide changes in antidepressant treatment in older patients with poor early response.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
文拉法辛XR治疗老年抑郁症患者:何时改变治疗的决策树
背景:老年重度抑郁障碍(MDD)患者抗抑郁反应的预测因素需要确认后才能指导治疗。目的:为早期识别不太可能对12周抗抑郁药物治疗有反应的老年MDD患者创建决策树,我们分析了454名老年参与者在晚期抑郁症不完全缓解研究中接受文拉法辛XR (150-300 mg/天)治疗长达12周的数据。方法:我们选择了最早的决策点,当我们能够检测到那些在治疗12周后还没有反应(定义为>50%的症状改善)的参与者。利用接受者操作特征模型,我们创建了两个决策树,以最大限度地减少对未来响应者的错误识别(假阳性)或对未来无响应者的错误识别(假阴性)。这些决策树综合了基线特征和早期决策点的治疗反应作为预测因子。发现:我们选择第4周作为最优的早期决策点。两种决策树在第4周时都有最小的症状减轻,更长的发作持续时间,以前没有对抗抑郁药产生反应作为无反应的预测因子。两棵树最左侧终端节点的检测阴性预测值分别为77.4%和76.6%。结论:我们的决策树有可能指导老年重度抑郁症患者的治疗,但需要在其他更大的样本中进行验证。临床意义:一旦得到证实,我们的发现可能用于指导早期反应较差的老年患者抗抑郁药物治疗的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Evidence-Based Mental Health alerts clinicians to important advances in treatment, diagnosis, aetiology, prognosis, continuing education, economic evaluation and qualitative research in mental health. Published by the British Psychological Society, the Royal College of Psychiatrists and the BMJ Publishing Group the journal surveys a wide range of international medical journals applying strict criteria for the quality and validity of research. Clinicians assess the relevance of the best studies and the key details of these essential studies are presented in a succinct, informative abstract with an expert commentary on its clinical application.Evidence-Based Mental Health is a multidisciplinary, quarterly publication.
期刊最新文献
Vitruvian plot: a visualisation tool for multiple outcomes in network meta-analysis. Important adverse events to be evaluated in antidepressant trials and meta-analyses in depression: a large international preference study including patients and healthcare professionals. Comparison of prediction methods for treatment continuation of antipsychotics in children and adolescents with schizophrenia. Components of smartphone cognitive-behavioural therapy for subthreshold depression among 1093 university students: a factorial trial. Associations between antipsychotics and risk of violent crimes and suicidal behaviour in personality disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1