Multimodal assessment of communicative-pragmatic features in schizophrenia: a machine learning approach.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY NPJ Schizophrenia Pub Date : 2021-05-24 DOI:10.1038/s41537-021-00153-4
Alberto Parola, Ilaria Gabbatore, Laura Berardinelli, Rogerio Salvini, Francesca M Bosco
{"title":"Multimodal assessment of communicative-pragmatic features in schizophrenia: a machine learning approach.","authors":"Alberto Parola, Ilaria Gabbatore, Laura Berardinelli, Rogerio Salvini, Francesca M Bosco","doi":"10.1038/s41537-021-00153-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An impairment in pragmatic communication is a core feature of schizophrenia, often associated with difficulties in social interactions. The pragmatic deficits regard various pragmatic phenomena, e.g., direct and indirect communicative acts, deceit, irony, and include not only the use of language but also other expressive means such as non-verbal/extralinguistic modalities, e.g., gestures and body movements, and paralinguistic cues, e.g., prosody and tone of voice. The present paper focuses on the identification of those pragmatic features, i.e., communicative phenomena and expressive modalities, that more reliably discriminate between individuals with schizophrenia and healthy controls. We performed a multimodal assessment of communicative-pragmatic ability, and applied a machine learning approach, specifically a Decision Tree model, with the aim of identifying the pragmatic features that best separate the data into the two groups, i.e., individuals with schizophrenia and healthy controls, and represent their configuration. The results indicated good overall performance of the Decision Tree model, with mean Accuracy of 82%, Sensitivity of 76%, and Precision of 91%. Linguistic irony emerged as the most relevant pragmatic phenomenon in distinguishing between the two groups, followed by violation of the Gricean maxims, and then extralinguistic deceitful and sincere communicative acts. The results are discussed in light of the pragmatic theoretical literature, and their clinical relevance in terms of content and design of both assessment and rehabilitative training.</p>","PeriodicalId":19328,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Schizophrenia","volume":"7 1","pages":"28"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8144364/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Schizophrenia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41537-021-00153-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An impairment in pragmatic communication is a core feature of schizophrenia, often associated with difficulties in social interactions. The pragmatic deficits regard various pragmatic phenomena, e.g., direct and indirect communicative acts, deceit, irony, and include not only the use of language but also other expressive means such as non-verbal/extralinguistic modalities, e.g., gestures and body movements, and paralinguistic cues, e.g., prosody and tone of voice. The present paper focuses on the identification of those pragmatic features, i.e., communicative phenomena and expressive modalities, that more reliably discriminate between individuals with schizophrenia and healthy controls. We performed a multimodal assessment of communicative-pragmatic ability, and applied a machine learning approach, specifically a Decision Tree model, with the aim of identifying the pragmatic features that best separate the data into the two groups, i.e., individuals with schizophrenia and healthy controls, and represent their configuration. The results indicated good overall performance of the Decision Tree model, with mean Accuracy of 82%, Sensitivity of 76%, and Precision of 91%. Linguistic irony emerged as the most relevant pragmatic phenomenon in distinguishing between the two groups, followed by violation of the Gricean maxims, and then extralinguistic deceitful and sincere communicative acts. The results are discussed in light of the pragmatic theoretical literature, and their clinical relevance in terms of content and design of both assessment and rehabilitative training.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精神分裂症患者交流语用特征的多模态评估:一种机器学习方法。
实用性交流障碍是精神分裂症的一个核心特征,通常与社会交往困难有关。语用障碍涉及各种语用现象,如直接和间接交际行为、欺骗、讽刺等,不仅包括语言的使用,还包括其他表达方式,如非语言/语外方式,如手势和肢体动作,以及副语言线索,如拟声词和语调。本文的重点是识别那些能更可靠地区分精神分裂症患者和健康对照者的语用特征,即交际现象和表达方式。我们对交际-语用能力进行了多模态评估,并应用了机器学习方法,特别是决策树模型,目的是找出最能将数据分为两组(即精神分裂症患者和健康对照组)并代表其配置的语用特征。结果表明,决策树模型的总体性能良好,平均准确率为 82%,灵敏度为 76%,精确度为 91%。语言反讽是区分两组人最相关的语用现象,其次是违反格莱斯格言,然后是语言外的欺骗和真诚的交际行为。本文根据语用学理论文献对研究结果进行了讨论,并从评估和康复训练的内容和设计方面阐述了这些结果的临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
NPJ Schizophrenia
NPJ Schizophrenia Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Schizophrenia is an international, peer-reviewed journal that aims to publish high-quality original papers and review articles relevant to all aspects of schizophrenia and psychosis, from molecular and basic research through environmental or social research, to translational and treatment-related topics. npj Schizophrenia publishes papers on the broad psychosis spectrum including affective psychosis, bipolar disorder, the at-risk mental state, psychotic symptoms, and overlap between psychotic and other disorders.
期刊最新文献
Reduction of intracortical inhibition (ICI) correlates with cognitive performance and psychopathology symptoms in schizophrenia Multivariate associations between neuroanatomy and cognition in unmedicated and medicated individuals with schizophrenia RNA-sequencing suggests extracellular matrix and vasculature dysregulation could impair neurogenesis in schizophrenia cases with elevated inflammation Socioeconomic status, personality, and major mental disorders: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study Differences in schizophrenia treatments by race and ethnicity—analysis of electronic health records
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1