COVID-19 Vaccine's Speed to Market and Vaccine Hesitancy: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

Q2 Medicine Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.12927/hcpol.2023.27153
Ally Memedovich, Brenlea Farkas, Aidan Hollis, Charleen Salmon, Jia Hu, Kate Zinszer, Tyler Williamson, Reed F Beall
{"title":"COVID-19 Vaccine's Speed to Market and Vaccine Hesitancy: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.","authors":"Ally Memedovich, Brenlea Farkas, Aidan Hollis, Charleen Salmon, Jia Hu, Kate Zinszer, Tyler Williamson, Reed F Beall","doi":"10.12927/hcpol.2023.27153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This paper aims to assess the extent to which the COVID-19 vaccine's speed to market affected Canadian residents' decision to remain unvaccinated.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional survey conducted in late 2021 asked participants whether they had received the vaccine and their reasons for abstaining.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 2,712 participants who completed the survey, 8.9% remained unvaccinated. Unvaccinated respondents who selected \"They made the vaccine too fast\" (59.8%), were significantly more likely to identify as white, believe that the COVID-19 pandemic was not serious and have an unvaccinated social circle.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Should the COVID-19 vaccine rapid regulatory process be expanded, more patients may refuse treatment than if traditional timelines are followed.</p>","PeriodicalId":39389,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare Policy","volume":"19 1","pages":"99-113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10519340/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpol.2023.27153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This paper aims to assess the extent to which the COVID-19 vaccine's speed to market affected Canadian residents' decision to remain unvaccinated.

Method: A cross-sectional survey conducted in late 2021 asked participants whether they had received the vaccine and their reasons for abstaining.

Results: Of the 2,712 participants who completed the survey, 8.9% remained unvaccinated. Unvaccinated respondents who selected "They made the vaccine too fast" (59.8%), were significantly more likely to identify as white, believe that the COVID-19 pandemic was not serious and have an unvaccinated social circle.

Conclusion: Should the COVID-19 vaccine rapid regulatory process be expanded, more patients may refuse treatment than if traditional timelines are followed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎疫苗上市速度与疫苗犹豫:跨部门调查研究。
背景:本文旨在评估新冠肺炎疫苗上市速度在多大程度上影响了加拿大居民保持未接种疫苗的决定。方法:2021年末进行的一项横断面调查询问参与者是否接种了疫苗以及弃权的原因。结果:在完成调查的2712名参与者中,8.9%仍未接种疫苗。未接种疫苗的受访者选择“他们接种疫苗的速度太快”(59.8%),更容易被认为是白人,认为新冠肺炎疫情并不严重,并且有未接种疫苗者的社交圈。结论:如果新冠肺炎疫苗快速监管程序扩大,可能会有更多的患者拒绝治疗,而不是按照传统的时间表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Healthcare Policy
Healthcare Policy Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
期刊最新文献
"Whatever Job I'm In, I'm Going to Find a Way to Make a Difference" - A Black Community Leader's Perspective on Engagement and Advocacy. "You Can't Let Go" - A Black Community Leader's Perspective on Engagement and Advocacy. Black Community Health Advocates in Ontario: A Look at Health Policy Engagement From the Ground Up. Engaging Canadians in Health Policy Is no Trivial Matter. Ethical and Transformative Scholarly Public Engagement: Pitfalls, Possibilities and Promises.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1