Genotyping genetic variants of CYP2C19 for precision antiplatelet dosing: state of the art and future perspectives.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1080/17425255.2022.2166486
Natasa Djordjevic
{"title":"Genotyping genetic variants of <i>CYP2C19</i> for precision antiplatelet dosing: state of the art and future perspectives.","authors":"Natasa Djordjevic","doi":"10.1080/17425255.2022.2166486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Clopidogrel is the only antiplatelet agent whose activity is significantly affected by <i>CYP2C19</i> polymorphism.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review has summarized the available evidence on the clinically significant association between <i>CYP2C19</i> polymorphism and clopidogrel-based therapy; reviewed the current recommendations for clinical use of <i>CYP2C19</i> genotype test results in patients on clopidogrel treatment; and discussed possible pitfalls of routine application, and future perspectives of antiplatelets pharmacogenetics.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The available body of evidence, reflected in several meta-analyses and high-quality clinical practice guidelines, shows that the presence of <i>CYP2C19</i> LOF alleles, especially <i>CYP2C19*2</i>, correlates with impaired activation of clopidogrel and variable platelet inhibition, followed by minimal or no antiplatelet effect, and higher risk of treatment failure. In combination with other known risk factors, <i>CYP2C19</i> genetic testing could be very valuable in predicting low clopidogrel efficacy. At the same time, it could be very successful in selecting patients who will most probably benefit from the clopidogrel-based therapy, thus decreasing the pool of those who might need more expensive and otherwise riskier antiplatelet alternatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":12250,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology","volume":"18 12","pages":"817-830"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17425255.2022.2166486","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Clopidogrel is the only antiplatelet agent whose activity is significantly affected by CYP2C19 polymorphism.

Areas covered: This review has summarized the available evidence on the clinically significant association between CYP2C19 polymorphism and clopidogrel-based therapy; reviewed the current recommendations for clinical use of CYP2C19 genotype test results in patients on clopidogrel treatment; and discussed possible pitfalls of routine application, and future perspectives of antiplatelets pharmacogenetics.

Expert opinion: The available body of evidence, reflected in several meta-analyses and high-quality clinical practice guidelines, shows that the presence of CYP2C19 LOF alleles, especially CYP2C19*2, correlates with impaired activation of clopidogrel and variable platelet inhibition, followed by minimal or no antiplatelet effect, and higher risk of treatment failure. In combination with other known risk factors, CYP2C19 genetic testing could be very valuable in predicting low clopidogrel efficacy. At the same time, it could be very successful in selecting patients who will most probably benefit from the clopidogrel-based therapy, thus decreasing the pool of those who might need more expensive and otherwise riskier antiplatelet alternatives.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基因分型CYP2C19基因变异用于精确抗血小板给药:现状和未来展望
简介:氯吡格雷是唯一的抗血小板药物,其活性受CYP2C19多态性的显著影响。涵盖领域:本综述总结了CYP2C19多态性与氯吡格雷治疗之间临床显著相关性的现有证据;回顾了目前在氯吡格雷治疗患者中使用CYP2C19基因型检测结果的临床建议;并讨论了常规应用中可能存在的缺陷,以及抗血小板药物遗传学的未来前景。专家意见:根据多项荟萃分析和高质量的临床实践指南,现有的大量证据表明,CYP2C19 LOF等位基因的存在,特别是CYP2C19*2,与氯吡格雷活化受损和可变血小板抑制相关,随后抗血小板作用很小或没有,治疗失败的风险更高。结合其他已知的危险因素,CYP2C19基因检测在预测氯吡格雷低疗效方面可能非常有价值。同时,它可以非常成功地选择那些最有可能从氯吡格雷治疗中受益的患者,从而减少那些可能需要更昂贵和其他风险更大的抗血小板替代方案的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology
Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology 医学-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.30%
发文量
62
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology (ISSN 1742-5255 [print], 1744-7607 [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of ADME-Tox. Each article is structured to incorporate the author’s own expert opinion on the scope for future development. The Editors welcome: Reviews covering metabolic, pharmacokinetic and toxicological issues relating to specific drugs, drug-drug interactions, drug classes or their use in specific populations; issues relating to enzymes involved in the metabolism, disposition and excretion of drugs; techniques involved in the study of drug metabolism and toxicology; novel technologies for obtaining ADME-Tox data. Drug Evaluations reviewing the clinical, toxicological and pharmacokinetic data on a particular drug. The audience consists of scientists and managers in the pharmaceutical industry, pharmacologists, clinical toxicologists and related professionals.
期刊最新文献
A critical need for ‘gut neutrality’: mitigating adverse drug-microbiome interactions Drug interactions in cardiology: focus on statins and their combination with other lipid-lowering drugs Assessing the therapeutic and toxicological profile of novel GLP-1 receptor agonists for type 2 diabetes Clinical pharmacokinetics of glipizide: a systematic review Intraocular drugs: pharmacokinetic strategies and the influence on efficacy and durability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1