Comparison of patient classification systems for dimensioning nursing staff.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2023-0047en
Jéssica Azevedo Guardalupe, Ivana Duarte Brum, Débora Francisco do Canto, Kelly Cristina Milioni Telles, Ana Maria Müller de Magalhães, João Lucas Campos de Oliveira
{"title":"Comparison of patient classification systems for dimensioning nursing staff.","authors":"Jéssica Azevedo Guardalupe,&nbsp;Ivana Duarte Brum,&nbsp;Débora Francisco do Canto,&nbsp;Kelly Cristina Milioni Telles,&nbsp;Ana Maria Müller de Magalhães,&nbsp;João Lucas Campos de Oliveira","doi":"10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2023-0047en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare nursing staff workload and dimensioning measured by two patient classification systems.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Cross-sectional study, developed in a clinical inpatient unit of a large hospital in southern Brazil, between June and August 2022. Included patients (n = 260) were assessed through two different patient classification systems. The dimensioning calculation provided by the standard and descriptive statistics were applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the total number of patients, 1,248 classifications were performed with each of the classification systems. One of the instruments showed a concentration of demand for minimal care (54.5%) and the other for intermediate care (63.4%). The anticipation of required nursing hours was discrepant (235.58 and 298.16 hours), as well as the projected nursing staff, which was of 53 and 67 workers, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Measurement of workload and dimensioning were different when using two patient classification systems in the same sample. Additional accuracy studies shall be carried out.</p>","PeriodicalId":21229,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10499377/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2023-0047en","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare nursing staff workload and dimensioning measured by two patient classification systems.

Method: Cross-sectional study, developed in a clinical inpatient unit of a large hospital in southern Brazil, between June and August 2022. Included patients (n = 260) were assessed through two different patient classification systems. The dimensioning calculation provided by the standard and descriptive statistics were applied.

Results: Of the total number of patients, 1,248 classifications were performed with each of the classification systems. One of the instruments showed a concentration of demand for minimal care (54.5%) and the other for intermediate care (63.4%). The anticipation of required nursing hours was discrepant (235.58 and 298.16 hours), as well as the projected nursing staff, which was of 53 and 67 workers, respectively.

Conclusion: Measurement of workload and dimensioning were different when using two patient classification systems in the same sample. Additional accuracy studies shall be carried out.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护理人员尺寸患者分类系统的比较。
目的:比较两种病人分类系统所测量的护理人员工作量和量表。方法:横断面研究,于2022年6月至8月在巴西南部一家大型医院的临床住院病房开展。纳入的患者(n = 260)通过两种不同的患者分类系统进行评估。采用标准和描述性统计提供的量纲计算。结果:在患者总数中,每个分类系统进行了1248次分类。其中一项仪器显示对最低限度护理的需求集中(54.5%),另一项仪器显示对中间护理的需求集中(63.4%)。预计所需护理时数(235.58小时)和298.16小时)存在差异,预计护理人员分别为53人和67人。结论:在同一样本中使用两种患者分类系统时,工作量测量和量纲不同。应进行额外的准确性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
254
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The University of São Paulo Nursing School Journal (Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, REEUSP) is a bimonthly periodical revised by fellow nurses, which has the objective of publishing empirical or theoretical articles that represent a significant advance for the professional practice or for the fundaments of Nursing Mission: to stimulate knowledge production and dissemination in Nursing and related areas, focusing on international interlocution to advance Nursing science. Areas of Interest: Nursing and Health Its abbreviated title is Rev Esc Enferm USP, which should be used in bibliographies, footnotes and bibliographical references and strips.
期刊最新文献
Intensity and frequency of moral distress in mental health nurses in Brazil. Misinformation about COVID-19 among middle-aged and older migrants residing in Brazil and Portugal. Access to health services for international migrants during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study. Pejotização and implications for nursing work in Brazil: repercussions of neoliberalism. Parental stress during pregnancy and maternity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1