Ribavirin Does Not Enhance Hepatitis B Virus Nucleotide Antiviral Activity: A Pilot Study.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Clinical and Investigative Medicine Pub Date : 2022-12-31 DOI:10.25011/cim.v45i4.39274
Alexa Keeshan, Carla Coffin, Alicia Vachon, Nishi Patel, Scott Fung, Leanne Mortimer, Angela Crawley, Mang Ma, Carla Osiowy, Curtis Cooper
{"title":"Ribavirin Does Not Enhance Hepatitis B Virus Nucleotide Antiviral Activity: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Alexa Keeshan,&nbsp;Carla Coffin,&nbsp;Alicia Vachon,&nbsp;Nishi Patel,&nbsp;Scott Fung,&nbsp;Leanne Mortimer,&nbsp;Angela Crawley,&nbsp;Mang Ma,&nbsp;Carla Osiowy,&nbsp;Curtis Cooper","doi":"10.25011/cim.v45i4.39274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There is a need for effective and affordable treatments that achieve hepatitis B virus (HBV) functional cure and prevent long-term complications. The use of immune-modulators combined with HBV antivirals is a promising therapeutic strategy to achieve these goals. Based on ribavirin (RBV) monotherapy data, we hypothesized that RBV could improve virological responses when used in combination with tenofovir.  Methods: In this randomized, open label, controlled pilot trial, we evaluated RBV (n=4) dosed for the initial 24 weeks of treatment versus no RBV (n=4) in tenofovir recipients dosed over 48 weeks.  Results: Although well tolerated and safe in combination with tenofovir, RBV demonstrated no beneficial effects on virologic, biochemical or immunological markers of chronic HBV infection over 48 weeks of serial evaluation.  Conclusions: Our data does not suggest a HBV-specific immunomodulatory effect or an impact of RBV on HBV virological and antigen suppression.</p>","PeriodicalId":50683,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Investigative Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Investigative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25011/cim.v45i4.39274","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: There is a need for effective and affordable treatments that achieve hepatitis B virus (HBV) functional cure and prevent long-term complications. The use of immune-modulators combined with HBV antivirals is a promising therapeutic strategy to achieve these goals. Based on ribavirin (RBV) monotherapy data, we hypothesized that RBV could improve virological responses when used in combination with tenofovir.  Methods: In this randomized, open label, controlled pilot trial, we evaluated RBV (n=4) dosed for the initial 24 weeks of treatment versus no RBV (n=4) in tenofovir recipients dosed over 48 weeks.  Results: Although well tolerated and safe in combination with tenofovir, RBV demonstrated no beneficial effects on virologic, biochemical or immunological markers of chronic HBV infection over 48 weeks of serial evaluation.  Conclusions: Our data does not suggest a HBV-specific immunomodulatory effect or an impact of RBV on HBV virological and antigen suppression.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利巴韦林不能增强乙型肝炎病毒核苷酸抗病毒活性:一项初步研究。
目的:需要有效和负担得起的治疗方法,以实现乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)功能性治愈并预防长期并发症。使用免疫调节剂联合HBV抗病毒药物是实现这些目标的一种有希望的治疗策略。基于利巴韦林(RBV)单药治疗数据,我们假设RBV与替诺福韦联合使用可以改善病毒学反应。方法:在这项随机、开放标签、对照的试点试验中,我们评估了替诺福韦治疗最初24周时服用RBV (n=4)与48周后服用无RBV (n=4)的替诺福韦受体。结果:尽管RBV与替诺福韦联合使用耐受性良好且安全,但在48周的系列评估中,RBV对慢性HBV感染的病毒学、生化或免疫学标志物没有有益的影响。结论:我们的数据不表明HBV特异性免疫调节作用或RBV对HBV病毒学和抗原抑制的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Investigative Medicine
Clinical and Investigative Medicine 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Investigative Medicine (CIM), publishes original work in the field of Clinical Investigation. Original work includes clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical reports. Reviews include information for Continuing Medical Education (CME), narrative review articles, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses.
期刊最新文献
Global Trends and Frontier in Research on Pancreatic Alpha Cells: A Bibliometric Analysis from 2013 to 2023. Recommendations for Recovery of the COVID-19 Pandemic-related Diagnostic, Screening, and Procedure Backlog in Ontario: A Survey of Healthcare Leaders. Spring 2024: Clinician Investigator Trainee Association of Canada (CITAC). Training Outcomes and Satisfaction in Canadian MD/PhD and MD/MSc Programs: Findings from a National Survey. A Discussion with Dr. Natasha Kekre, Hematologist and Clinician Scientist.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1