What affected UK adults' adherence to medicines during the COVID-19 pandemic? Cross-sectional survey in a representative sample of people with long-term conditions.

IF 1.9 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Public Health-Heidelberg Pub Date : 2023-01-19 DOI:10.1007/s10389-022-01813-0
L S Penner, C J Armitage, T Thornley, P Whelan, A Chuter, T Allen, R A Elliott
{"title":"What affected UK adults' adherence to medicines during the COVID-19 pandemic? Cross-sectional survey in a representative sample of people with long-term conditions.","authors":"L S Penner, C J Armitage, T Thornley, P Whelan, A Chuter, T Allen, R A Elliott","doi":"10.1007/s10389-022-01813-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Medicines non-adherence is associated with poorer outcomes and higher costs. COVID-19 affected access to healthcare, with increased reliance on remote methods, including medicines supply. This study aimed to identify what affected people's adherence to medicines for long-term conditions (LTCs) during the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Subject and methods: </strong>Cross-sectional online survey of UK adults prescribed medicines for LTCs assessing self-reported medicines adherence, reasons for non-adherence (using the capability, opportunity and motivation model of behaviour [COM-B]), medicines access and COVID-19-related behaviours.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 1746 respondents reported a mean (SD) of 2.5 (1.9) LTCs, for which they were taking 2.4 (1.9) prescribed medicines, 525 (30.1%) reported using digital tools to support ordering or taking medicines and 22.6% reported medicines non-adherence. No access to at least one medicine was reported by 182 (10.4%) respondents; 1048 (60.0%) reported taking at least one non-prescription medicine as a substitute; 409 (23.4%) requested emergency supply from pharmacy for at least one medicine. Problems accessing medicines, being younger, male, in the highest socioeconomic group and working were linked to poorer adherence. Access problems were mostly directly or indirectly related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Respondents were generally lacking in capabilities and opportunities, but disruptions to habits (automatic motivation) was the major reason for non-adherence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Navigating changes in how medicines were accessed, and disruption of habits during the COVID-19 pandemic, was associated with suboptimal adherence. People were resourceful in overcoming barriers to access. Solutions to support medicines-taking need to take account of the multiple ways that medicines are prescribed and supplied remotely.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10389-022-01813-0.</p>","PeriodicalId":29967,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health-Heidelberg","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9849112/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health-Heidelberg","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-022-01813-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Medicines non-adherence is associated with poorer outcomes and higher costs. COVID-19 affected access to healthcare, with increased reliance on remote methods, including medicines supply. This study aimed to identify what affected people's adherence to medicines for long-term conditions (LTCs) during the pandemic.

Subject and methods: Cross-sectional online survey of UK adults prescribed medicines for LTCs assessing self-reported medicines adherence, reasons for non-adherence (using the capability, opportunity and motivation model of behaviour [COM-B]), medicines access and COVID-19-related behaviours.

Results: The 1746 respondents reported a mean (SD) of 2.5 (1.9) LTCs, for which they were taking 2.4 (1.9) prescribed medicines, 525 (30.1%) reported using digital tools to support ordering or taking medicines and 22.6% reported medicines non-adherence. No access to at least one medicine was reported by 182 (10.4%) respondents; 1048 (60.0%) reported taking at least one non-prescription medicine as a substitute; 409 (23.4%) requested emergency supply from pharmacy for at least one medicine. Problems accessing medicines, being younger, male, in the highest socioeconomic group and working were linked to poorer adherence. Access problems were mostly directly or indirectly related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Respondents were generally lacking in capabilities and opportunities, but disruptions to habits (automatic motivation) was the major reason for non-adherence.

Conclusion: Navigating changes in how medicines were accessed, and disruption of habits during the COVID-19 pandemic, was associated with suboptimal adherence. People were resourceful in overcoming barriers to access. Solutions to support medicines-taking need to take account of the multiple ways that medicines are prescribed and supplied remotely.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10389-022-01813-0.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,是什么影响了英国成年人坚持用药?对具有代表性的长期病患者进行横断面调查。
目的:不遵医嘱用药与较差的治疗效果和较高的成本有关。COVID-19 影响了医疗保健的获取,增加了对远程方法的依赖,包括药品供应。本研究旨在确定在大流行期间,哪些因素影响了人们对长期病症(LTC)药物的依从性:对象和方法:对开具 LTCs 药物处方的英国成年人进行横断面在线调查,评估自我报告的用药依从性、不依从的原因(使用行为的能力、机会和动机模型 [COM-B])、药物获取和 COVID-19 相关行为:1746名受访者平均(标清)报告了2.5(1.9)种长期慢性病,他们正在服用2.4(1.9)种处方药,525人(30.1%)报告使用数字工具支持订药或服药,22.6%的受访者报告未坚持服药。182(10.4%)名受访者表示无法获得至少一种药品;1048(60.0%)名受访者表示至少服用一种非处方药作为替代品;409(23.4%)名受访者表示至少向药房申请一种药品的紧急供应。获得药物方面的问题、年轻、男性、社会经济地位最高的群体以及工作等因素都与坚持服药的情况较差有关。获取药品方面的问题大多与 COVID-19 大流行直接或间接相关。受访者普遍缺乏能力和机会,但习惯的破坏(自动动机)是不坚持服药的主要原因:结论:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,如何应对药品获取方式的变化以及习惯的改变与未达到最佳依从性有关。人们在克服获取药物的障碍方面足智多谋。支持服药的解决方案需要考虑到处方和远程供应药物的多种方式:在线版本包含补充材料,可在 10.1007/s10389-022-01813-0 上查阅。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health-Heidelberg
Journal of Public Health-Heidelberg PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The relationship between life satisfaction, personal health, quality of life, and medication adherence among adolescents living with HIV in southwestern Uganda. Self-reported health among immigrants in Luxembourg: insights from a nationally representative sample. Levelling Up for health in towns? Development of a new deprivation index: the 'Stronger Towns Index' and its association with self-rated health and migration in England, between 2001 and 2011. Social networks and health behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study among older adults in the Netherlands. Racial disparities in lifestyle habits and dietary patterns in university students during the COVID-19 pandemic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1