The fifth edition of the World Health Organization Classification and the International Consensus Classification of myeloid neoplasms: evolving guidelines in the molecular era with practical implications.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Current Opinion in Hematology Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1097/MOH.0000000000000748
Gang Zheng, Peng Li, Xiaohui Zhang, Zenggang Pan
{"title":"The fifth edition of the World Health Organization Classification and the International Consensus Classification of myeloid neoplasms: evolving guidelines in the molecular era with practical implications.","authors":"Gang Zheng,&nbsp;Peng Li,&nbsp;Xiaohui Zhang,&nbsp;Zenggang Pan","doi":"10.1097/MOH.0000000000000748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>There have been major advances in our understanding of molecular pathogenesis of myeloid neoplasms, which prompt the updates in the classification of myeloid neoplasms in the fifth edition of World Health Organization Classification (WHO-5) and the new International Consensus Classification (ICC). The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of these two classification systems for myeloid neoplasms.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The definition, classification, and diagnostic criteria in many myeloid entities have been refined in WHO-5 and ICC with improved understanding of morphology and integration of new genetic findings. Particularly, molecular and cytogenetic studies have been increasingly incorporated into the classification, risk stratification, and selection of therapy of myeloid neoplasms. Overall, despite some revisions and discrepancies between WHO-5 and ICC, the major categories of myeloid neoplasms remain the same. Further validation studies are warranted to fine-tune and, ideally, integrate these two classifications.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Integration of clinical information, laboratory parameters, morphologic features, and cytogenetic and molecular studies is essential for the classification of myeloid neoplasms, as recommended by both WHO-5 and ICC.</p>","PeriodicalId":55196,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Hematology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOH.0000000000000748","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose of review: There have been major advances in our understanding of molecular pathogenesis of myeloid neoplasms, which prompt the updates in the classification of myeloid neoplasms in the fifth edition of World Health Organization Classification (WHO-5) and the new International Consensus Classification (ICC). The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of these two classification systems for myeloid neoplasms.

Recent findings: The definition, classification, and diagnostic criteria in many myeloid entities have been refined in WHO-5 and ICC with improved understanding of morphology and integration of new genetic findings. Particularly, molecular and cytogenetic studies have been increasingly incorporated into the classification, risk stratification, and selection of therapy of myeloid neoplasms. Overall, despite some revisions and discrepancies between WHO-5 and ICC, the major categories of myeloid neoplasms remain the same. Further validation studies are warranted to fine-tune and, ideally, integrate these two classifications.

Summary: Integration of clinical information, laboratory parameters, morphologic features, and cytogenetic and molecular studies is essential for the classification of myeloid neoplasms, as recommended by both WHO-5 and ICC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
世界卫生组织分类和髓系肿瘤国际共识分类第五版:分子时代具有实际意义的发展指南。
综述的目的:我们对髓系肿瘤分子发病机制的认识取得了重大进展,促使世界卫生组织第五版分类(WHO-5)和新的国际共识分类(ICC)对髓系肿瘤的分类进行了更新。这篇综述的目的是提供骨髓肿瘤的这两种分类系统的概述。最近的发现:随着对形态学和新遗传发现的理解的提高,许多髓系实体的定义、分类和诊断标准在WHO-5和ICC中得到了改进。特别是,分子和细胞遗传学研究已越来越多地纳入骨髓性肿瘤的分类、风险分层和治疗选择。总体而言,尽管WHO-5和ICC之间有一些修订和差异,但髓系肿瘤的主要类别仍然相同。进一步的验证研究有必要进行微调,并在理想情况下整合这两种分类。总结:根据WHO-5和ICC的建议,综合临床信息、实验室参数、形态学特征以及细胞遗传学和分子研究对于髓系肿瘤的分类至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
3.10%
发文量
78
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​Current Opinion in Hematology is an easy-to-digest bimonthly journal covering the most interesting and important advances in the field of hematology. Its hand-picked selection of editors ensure the highest quality selection of unbiased review articles on themes from nine key subject areas, including myeloid biology, Vascular biology, hematopoiesis and erythroid system and its diseases.
期刊最新文献
Novel neutrophil biology insights underlying atypical chemokine receptor-1/Duffy antigen receptor of chemokines-associated neutropenia. Donor selection in allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Heme- and iron-activated macrophages in sickle cell disease: an updated perspective. New insights of glycoprotein Ib-IX-V complex organization and glycoprotein Ibα in platelet biogenesis. Unrelated hematopoietic stem cell donor registries: present reality and future prospects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1