Return to play in elite rugby players after severe knee injuries.

IF 1 Q4 REHABILITATION South African Journal of Physiotherapy Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.4102/sajp.v78i1.1629
Aneurin D Robyn, Quinette A Louw, Jochen Baumeister
{"title":"Return to play in elite rugby players after severe knee injuries.","authors":"Aneurin D Robyn,&nbsp;Quinette A Louw,&nbsp;Jochen Baumeister","doi":"10.4102/sajp.v78i1.1629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical professionals working in an elite sport environment have the challenging task to balance the athlete's readiness to return to the playing field after severe injury with other stakeholders' (coaches, sponsors, teammates) opinions and objectives.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our study aimed to evaluate differences in the physical profiles of elite rugby players at return to play (RTP) after a severe knee injury, compared with their pre-injury profiles and matched controls.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Before the injury, participants performed four performance tests during their preseason screening. These tests were repeated and compared to baseline once a player was declared fit to play.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.05) were found in the injured players' group who were slower over 10 m speed, in their decision-making time and the total time of the reactive agility tests at RTP, whilst controls were significantly faster over 10 m and 30 m speed tests. The countermovement jump outcomes showed significant improvement in the uninjured participants (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study highlights that injured players' running speeds and decision-making times are slower after injury. The uninjured players have a positive outcome to training and match stimulus by improving their running speed and lower body explosive power during the season.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Our study provides insight into the RTP profile of elite rugby players, and a novel finding was the decision-making time deficit. This highlights the importance of cognitive training during injury rehabilitation as athletes make numerous decisions in a pressured and uncontrolled environment during a match. Speed training development is recommended as the athletes were slower after severe knee injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":44180,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":"78 1","pages":"1629"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9082221/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v78i1.1629","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Medical professionals working in an elite sport environment have the challenging task to balance the athlete's readiness to return to the playing field after severe injury with other stakeholders' (coaches, sponsors, teammates) opinions and objectives.

Objectives: Our study aimed to evaluate differences in the physical profiles of elite rugby players at return to play (RTP) after a severe knee injury, compared with their pre-injury profiles and matched controls.

Method: Before the injury, participants performed four performance tests during their preseason screening. These tests were repeated and compared to baseline once a player was declared fit to play.

Results: Significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) were found in the injured players' group who were slower over 10 m speed, in their decision-making time and the total time of the reactive agility tests at RTP, whilst controls were significantly faster over 10 m and 30 m speed tests. The countermovement jump outcomes showed significant improvement in the uninjured participants (p ≤ 0.05).

Conclusion: Our study highlights that injured players' running speeds and decision-making times are slower after injury. The uninjured players have a positive outcome to training and match stimulus by improving their running speed and lower body explosive power during the season.

Clinical implications: Our study provides insight into the RTP profile of elite rugby players, and a novel finding was the decision-making time deficit. This highlights the importance of cognitive training during injury rehabilitation as athletes make numerous decisions in a pressured and uncontrolled environment during a match. Speed training development is recommended as the athletes were slower after severe knee injury.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在严重的膝盖受伤后,回到精英橄榄球运动员的比赛。
背景:在精英运动环境中工作的医疗专业人员面临着一项具有挑战性的任务,即平衡运动员在严重受伤后重返赛场的准备情况与其他利益相关者(教练、赞助商、队友)的意见和目标。目的:我们的研究旨在评估精英橄榄球运动员在严重膝盖损伤后恢复比赛(RTP)时的身体特征的差异,与他们受伤前的身体特征和匹配的对照组进行比较。方法:在受伤前,参与者在季前筛选期间进行了四次性能测试。一旦球员被宣布适合比赛,这些测试将被重复并与基线进行比较。结果:10 m以上速度较慢组在RTP反应敏捷性测试的决策时间和总时间上存在显著差异(p≤0.05),而对照组在10 m和30 m速度测试中显著较快。未受伤受试者的反动作跳跃结果有显著改善(p≤0.05)。结论:我们的研究强调了受伤球员在受伤后的跑步速度和决策时间变慢。未受伤球员在赛季中通过提高跑动速度和下肢爆发力对训练和比赛刺激有积极的效果。临床意义:我们的研究提供了对精英橄榄球运动员RTP特征的深入了解,并有一个新的发现是决策时间缺陷。这突出了认知训练在损伤康复中的重要性,因为运动员在比赛中要在压力和不受控制的环境中做出许多决定。由于运动员在严重膝伤后速度变慢,建议进行速度训练。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
35
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Preventing deformities in paediatric cerebral palsy in poorly-resourced areas: A scoping review. Contextual factors experienced by mothers of children with special needs. Neurological examination of healthy term infants at ages 6 and 10 weeks in Tshwane District. Protracted exercise tolerance post-coronavirus disease 2019 in endurance athletes: A survey. Mental health content in the physiotherapy undergraduate curriculum in South Africa.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1