HIV Related Stigma among Healthcare Providers: Opportunities for Education and Training.

Amanda Blair Spence, Cuiwei Wang, Katherine Michel, Joanne Michelle Ocampo, Michael Kharfen, Daniel Merenstein, Lakshmi Goparaju, Seble Kassaye
{"title":"HIV Related Stigma among Healthcare Providers: Opportunities for Education and Training.","authors":"Amanda Blair Spence,&nbsp;Cuiwei Wang,&nbsp;Katherine Michel,&nbsp;Joanne Michelle Ocampo,&nbsp;Michael Kharfen,&nbsp;Daniel Merenstein,&nbsp;Lakshmi Goparaju,&nbsp;Seble Kassaye","doi":"10.1177/23259582221114797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> HIV-stigma can influence engagement in care and viral suppression rates among persons living with HIV (PLWH). Understanding HIV-provider level stigma and its associated factors may aid in development of interventions to improve engagement in care. <b>Methods:</b> We assessed HIV-related stigma, provider knowledge, and practices and beliefs among healthcare providers using an online survey tool. Generalized linear modeling was used to determine factors associated with HIV-stigma score. <b>Results:</b> Among 436 participants, the mean age was 42.3 (SD 12.3), 70% female, 62% white, 65% physicians, and 44% worked at an academic center. The mean HIV Health Care Provider Stigma Scale (HPASS) score was 150.5 (SD 18.9, total = 180 [higher score = less stigma]) with factor subscale scores of 67.1 (SD 8.2, total = 78) prejudice, 51.3 (SD 9.7, total = 66) stereotyping, and 32.1 (SD 5, total = 36) discrimination. Female sex and comfort with talking about sex and drug use had 4.97 (95% CI 0.61, 9.32) and 1.99 (95% CI 0.88, 3.10) estimated higher HPASS scores. Disagreement/strong disagreement versus strong agreement with the statement that PLWH should be allowed to have babies and feeling responsible for talking about HIV prevention associated with -17.05 (95% CI -25.96, -8.15) and -2.16 (95% CI -3.43, -0.88) estimated lower HPASS scores. <b>Conclusions:</b> The modifiable factors we identified as associated with higher HIV related stigma may provide opportunities for education that may ameliorate these negative associations.</p>","PeriodicalId":17328,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/05/f9/10.1177_23259582221114797.PMC9310064.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259582221114797","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: HIV-stigma can influence engagement in care and viral suppression rates among persons living with HIV (PLWH). Understanding HIV-provider level stigma and its associated factors may aid in development of interventions to improve engagement in care. Methods: We assessed HIV-related stigma, provider knowledge, and practices and beliefs among healthcare providers using an online survey tool. Generalized linear modeling was used to determine factors associated with HIV-stigma score. Results: Among 436 participants, the mean age was 42.3 (SD 12.3), 70% female, 62% white, 65% physicians, and 44% worked at an academic center. The mean HIV Health Care Provider Stigma Scale (HPASS) score was 150.5 (SD 18.9, total = 180 [higher score = less stigma]) with factor subscale scores of 67.1 (SD 8.2, total = 78) prejudice, 51.3 (SD 9.7, total = 66) stereotyping, and 32.1 (SD 5, total = 36) discrimination. Female sex and comfort with talking about sex and drug use had 4.97 (95% CI 0.61, 9.32) and 1.99 (95% CI 0.88, 3.10) estimated higher HPASS scores. Disagreement/strong disagreement versus strong agreement with the statement that PLWH should be allowed to have babies and feeling responsible for talking about HIV prevention associated with -17.05 (95% CI -25.96, -8.15) and -2.16 (95% CI -3.43, -0.88) estimated lower HPASS scores. Conclusions: The modifiable factors we identified as associated with higher HIV related stigma may provide opportunities for education that may ameliorate these negative associations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗保健提供者中与艾滋病毒相关的耻辱:教育和培训的机会。
背景:艾滋病毒耻辱感可以影响艾滋病毒感染者(PLWH)参与护理和病毒抑制率。了解艾滋病毒提供者水平的耻辱及其相关因素可能有助于制定干预措施,以提高对护理的参与度。方法:我们使用在线调查工具评估艾滋病毒相关的耻辱,提供者知识,以及医疗保健提供者的做法和信念。采用广义线性模型确定与hiv污名评分相关的因素。结果:在436名参与者中,平均年龄为42.3岁(SD 12.3), 70%为女性,62%为白人,65%为医生,44%在学术中心工作。HIV卫生保健提供者污名量表(HPASS)平均得分为150.5分(SD 18.9,总= 180[得分越高=污名越少]),因子子量表得分为偏见67.1分(SD 8.2,总= 78),刻板印象51.3分(SD 9.7,总= 66),歧视32.1分(SD 5,总= 36)。女性的性行为以及谈论性和吸毒的舒适度分别有4.97 (95% CI 0.61, 9.32)和1.99 (95% CI 0.88, 3.10)的HPASS评分较高。不同意/强烈不同意与强烈同意的说法,即应该允许艾滋病毒携带者生孩子,并感到有责任谈论艾滋病毒预防,与-17.05 (95% CI -25.96, -8.15)和-2.16 (95% CI -3.43, -0.88)相关的HPASS评分估计较低。结论:我们确定的与HIV相关的更高的耻辱感相关的可修改因素可能为改善这些负面关联的教育提供机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Providers as Health Discussants on Black Women's Interest in PrEP for HIV Prevention. The Provider's Role in Retaining Black Women With HIV in Care: A Scoping Review. Rapid Start of Antiretroviral Therapy in a Large Urban Clinic in the US South: Impact on HIV Care Continuum Outcomes and Medication Adherence. Dissemination of the Women-Centred HIV Care Model: A Multimodal Process and Evaluation. Policy and Programming Towards Addressing Treatment Gaps in Adolescents Living with HIV: A Content Analysis of Policy and Programme Documents in Namibia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1