Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes During the COVID-19 Epidemic in Pregnancies Complicated by Gestational Diabetes.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Zdravstveno Varstvo Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.2478/sjph-2023-0004
Ana Munda, Blažka Šturm Indihar, Gaj Okanovič, Klara Zorko, Lili Steblovnik, Draženka Pongrac Barlovič
{"title":"Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes During the COVID-19 Epidemic in Pregnancies Complicated by Gestational Diabetes.","authors":"Ana Munda,&nbsp;Blažka Šturm Indihar,&nbsp;Gaj Okanovič,&nbsp;Klara Zorko,&nbsp;Lili Steblovnik,&nbsp;Draženka Pongrac Barlovič","doi":"10.2478/sjph-2023-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Gestational diabetes (GDM) is one of the most common complications in pregnancy, with a prevalence that continues to rise. At the time of the COVID-19 epidemic, immediate reorganisation and adjustment of the system was needed. Telemedicine support was offered in order to provide high-quality treatment to pregnant women. However, the success of the treatment is unknown. We therefore aimed to evaluate COVID-19 epidemic effects on pregnancy outcomes in GDM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The maternal outcomes (insulin treatment, gestational weight gain, caesarean section, hypertensive disorders) and perinatal outcomes (rates of large and small for gestational age, preterm birth and a composite child outcome) of women visiting a university hospital diabetes clinic from March to December 2020 were compared with those treated in the same period in 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Women diagnosed with GDM during the COVID-19 epidemic (n=417), were diagnosed earlier (23.9 [11.7-26.0] vs. 25.1 [21.8-26.7] gestational week), had higher fasting glucose (5.2 [5.0-5.4] vs. 5.1 [4.8-5.3] mmol/l) and earlier pharmacological therapy initiation, and had achieved lower HbA1c by the end of followup (5.1% (32.2 mmol/mol) [4.9% (30.1 mmol/mol)-5.4% (35.0 mmol/mol)] vs. 5.2% (33.3 mmol/mol) [5.0% (31.1 mmol/mol) - 5.4%·(35.5 mmol/mol)], p<0.001) compared to a year before (n=430). No significant differences in perinatal outcomes were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although GDM was diagnosed at an earlier gestational age and higher fasting glucose concentration was present at the time of diagnosis, the COVID-19 epidemic did not result in worse glucose control during pregnancy or worse pregnancy outcomes in Slovenia.</p>","PeriodicalId":45127,"journal":{"name":"Zdravstveno Varstvo","volume":"62 1","pages":"22-29"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/74/07/sjph-62-022.PMC9837814.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zdravstveno Varstvo","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2023-0004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Gestational diabetes (GDM) is one of the most common complications in pregnancy, with a prevalence that continues to rise. At the time of the COVID-19 epidemic, immediate reorganisation and adjustment of the system was needed. Telemedicine support was offered in order to provide high-quality treatment to pregnant women. However, the success of the treatment is unknown. We therefore aimed to evaluate COVID-19 epidemic effects on pregnancy outcomes in GDM.

Methods: The maternal outcomes (insulin treatment, gestational weight gain, caesarean section, hypertensive disorders) and perinatal outcomes (rates of large and small for gestational age, preterm birth and a composite child outcome) of women visiting a university hospital diabetes clinic from March to December 2020 were compared with those treated in the same period in 2019.

Results: Women diagnosed with GDM during the COVID-19 epidemic (n=417), were diagnosed earlier (23.9 [11.7-26.0] vs. 25.1 [21.8-26.7] gestational week), had higher fasting glucose (5.2 [5.0-5.4] vs. 5.1 [4.8-5.3] mmol/l) and earlier pharmacological therapy initiation, and had achieved lower HbA1c by the end of followup (5.1% (32.2 mmol/mol) [4.9% (30.1 mmol/mol)-5.4% (35.0 mmol/mol)] vs. 5.2% (33.3 mmol/mol) [5.0% (31.1 mmol/mol) - 5.4%·(35.5 mmol/mol)], p<0.001) compared to a year before (n=430). No significant differences in perinatal outcomes were found.

Conclusions: Although GDM was diagnosed at an earlier gestational age and higher fasting glucose concentration was present at the time of diagnosis, the COVID-19 epidemic did not result in worse glucose control during pregnancy or worse pregnancy outcomes in Slovenia.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19流行期间合并妊娠期糖尿病的孕产妇和围产期结局
妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)是妊娠期最常见的并发症之一,其患病率持续上升。在新冠肺炎疫情发生时,需要立即对该系统进行重组和调整。提供远程医疗支助是为了向孕妇提供高质量的治疗。然而,这种疗法的成功与否尚不得而知。因此,我们旨在评估COVID-19流行对GDM妊娠结局的影响。方法:将2020年3月至12月在某大学医院糖尿病门诊就诊的妇女的孕产妇结局(胰岛素治疗、妊娠体重增加、剖宫产、高血压疾病)和围产期结局(胎龄大、小、早产率和复合儿结局)与2019年同期就诊的妇女进行比较。结果:在COVID-19流行期间诊断为GDM的妇女(n=417),诊断较早(23.9 [11.7-26.0]vs. 25.1[21.8-26.7]孕周),空腹血糖较高(5.2 [5.0-5.4]vs. 5.1 [4.8-5.3] mmol/l),药物治疗开始较早,随访结束时HbA1c较低(5.1% (32.2 mmol/mol) [4.9% (30.1 mmol/mol)-5.4% (35.0 mmol/mol)] vs. 5.2% (33.3 mmol/mol) [5.0% (31.1 mmol/mol)-5.4%·(35.5 mmol/mol)]。尽管在较早的胎龄时诊断出GDM,并且在诊断时存在较高的空腹血糖浓度,但在斯洛文尼亚,COVID-19流行并未导致妊娠期间血糖控制恶化或妊娠结局恶化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Zdravstveno Varstvo
Zdravstveno Varstvo PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cancer Risk Factors Awareness in Slovenian Adolescents. Epidemiology and Risk Factor Analysis of Systemic Allergic Reaction to Bee Venom in the Slovenian Population of Beekeepers. Exploring General Practitioner Work in Upper Austria: A Pilot Retrospective Observational Study Across Thirty Practices. Factors Associated with Low Back Overuse Injuries in Sports Science Students - A Prospective Study. Patients' Experience with Received Healthcare in Internal Medicine and Surgery Wards of Slovenian Hospitals-A Cross-Sectional Survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1