Extubation failure and the use of noninvasive ventilation during the weaning process in critically ill COVID-19 patients.

Viviane Martins Corrêa Boniatti, Chaiane Ribeiro Pereira, Gabriela Machado Costa, Michelle Carneiro Teixeira, Alessandra Preisig Werlang, Francielle Thaisa Morais Martins, Leonardo da Silva Marques, Wagner Luís Nedel, Márcio Manozzo Boniatti
{"title":"Extubation failure and the use of noninvasive ventilation during the weaning process in critically ill COVID-19 patients.","authors":"Viviane Martins Corrêa Boniatti,&nbsp;Chaiane Ribeiro Pereira,&nbsp;Gabriela Machado Costa,&nbsp;Michelle Carneiro Teixeira,&nbsp;Alessandra Preisig Werlang,&nbsp;Francielle Thaisa Morais Martins,&nbsp;Leonardo da Silva Marques,&nbsp;Wagner Luís Nedel,&nbsp;Márcio Manozzo Boniatti","doi":"10.5935/2965-2774.20230009-en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the outcome of extubation in COVID-19 patients and the use of noninvasive ventilation in the weaning process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, observational, single-center study was conducted in COVID-19 patients aged 18 years or older who were admitted to an intensive care unit between April 2020 and December 2021, placed under mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours and progressed to weaning. Early extubation was defined as extubation without a spontaneous breathing trial and immediate use of noninvasive ventilation after extubation. In patients who underwent a spontaneous breathing trial, noninvasive ventilation could be used as prophylactic ventilatory assistance when started immediately after extubation (prophylactic noninvasive ventilation) or as rescue therapy in cases of postextubation respiratory failure (therapeutic noninvasive ventilation). The primary outcome was extubation failure during the intensive care unit stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred eighty-four extubated patients were included. Extubation failure was observed in 107 (27.9%) patients. Forty-seven (12.2%) patients received prophylactic noninvasive ventilation. In 26 (6.8%) patients, early extubation was performed with immediate use of noninvasive ventilation. Noninvasive ventilation for the management of postextubation respiratory failure was administered to 64 (16.7%) patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found that COVID-19 patients had a high rate of extubation failure. Despite the high risk of extubation failure, we observed low use of prophylactic noninvasive ventilation in these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":72721,"journal":{"name":"Critical care science","volume":"35 2","pages":"163-167"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10406404/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/2965-2774.20230009-en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the outcome of extubation in COVID-19 patients and the use of noninvasive ventilation in the weaning process.

Methods: This retrospective, observational, single-center study was conducted in COVID-19 patients aged 18 years or older who were admitted to an intensive care unit between April 2020 and December 2021, placed under mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours and progressed to weaning. Early extubation was defined as extubation without a spontaneous breathing trial and immediate use of noninvasive ventilation after extubation. In patients who underwent a spontaneous breathing trial, noninvasive ventilation could be used as prophylactic ventilatory assistance when started immediately after extubation (prophylactic noninvasive ventilation) or as rescue therapy in cases of postextubation respiratory failure (therapeutic noninvasive ventilation). The primary outcome was extubation failure during the intensive care unit stay.

Results: Three hundred eighty-four extubated patients were included. Extubation failure was observed in 107 (27.9%) patients. Forty-seven (12.2%) patients received prophylactic noninvasive ventilation. In 26 (6.8%) patients, early extubation was performed with immediate use of noninvasive ventilation. Noninvasive ventilation for the management of postextubation respiratory failure was administered to 64 (16.7%) patients.

Conclusion: We found that COVID-19 patients had a high rate of extubation failure. Despite the high risk of extubation failure, we observed low use of prophylactic noninvasive ventilation in these patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
危重新冠肺炎患者在断奶过程中的拔管失败和无创通气的使用。
目的:评估新冠肺炎患者拔管的结果以及无创通气在断奶过程中的应用。方法:这项回顾性、观察性、单中心研究对2020年4月至2021年12月期间入住重症监护室、接受机械通气超过48小时并进展为断奶的18岁或18岁以上的新冠肺炎患者进行。早期拔管是指未进行自主呼吸试验的拔管,拔管后立即使用无创通气。在接受自主呼吸试验的患者中,拔管后立即开始的无创通气可作为预防性通气辅助(预防性无创通气),或在拔管后呼吸衰竭的情况下作为抢救治疗(治疗性无创通风)。主要结果是在重症监护室期间拔管失败。结果:纳入了384例拔管患者。107例(27.9%)患者出现拔管失败。47名(12.2%)患者接受了预防性无创通气。在26例(6.8%)患者中,立即使用无创通气进行早期拔管。64名(16.7%)患者采用无创通气治疗拔管后呼吸衰竭。结论:新冠肺炎患者拔管失败率高。尽管拔管失败的风险很高,但我们观察到这些患者预防性无创通气的使用率很低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analyzing how the components of the SOFA score change over time in their contribution to mortality. To: Clinical outcomes of intensive care unit-acquired weakness in critically ill COVID-19 patients. A prospective cohort study. Challenges in using the dynamic components of the SOFA score in health care databases. Impact of intensive care unit admission on cancer patients: enhancing long-term survival through better understanding. Rate of non-metastatic solid tumor progression following critical illness: a prospective cohort study of UK Biobank participants.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1