Perceptions and Concerns of SUD Treatment Organizations Regarding the CARES Act's Alterations to Patient Confidentiality Regulations.

Julia Ivanova, Michael Saks, George Karway, Anita Murcko, Candy Espino, Chase Millea, Melissa Soliz, Adela Grando
{"title":"Perceptions and Concerns of SUD Treatment Organizations Regarding the CARES Act's Alterations to Patient Confidentiality Regulations.","authors":"Julia Ivanova,&nbsp;Michael Saks,&nbsp;George Karway,&nbsp;Anita Murcko,&nbsp;Candy Espino,&nbsp;Chase Millea,&nbsp;Melissa Soliz,&nbsp;Adela Grando","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Learn how substance use disorder (SUD) treatment organizations view and respond to changes in confidentiality and disclosure law following adoption of CARES Act Sec. 3221 and prior to promulgation of revised implementing regulations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Online survey followed by informal interviews. Representatives of SUD organizations reported their degree of awareness of Sec. 3221 provisions and their organizations' views on amendments to disclosure practices; current and future changes of organizational policies; difficulties anticipated in implementing new rules; and preferences for resources.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty informant surveys on 30 organizations completed. Participants (62.5 percent) indicated being somewhat knowledgeable about Sec. 3221. Evenly divided positive and concerned views on Sec. 3221 reflect tension between preserving confidentiality of patient records and improving coordination of care. Most (76.7 percent) reported organizational discussions on Sec. 3221. Some (30 percent) identified changes to make in near future. Over a third expected few or no barriers to implementing changes to privacy and disclosure practices, while most (64.7 percent) expected hindrances including complexity and tensions in the law, staff education, cost, technological adjustments, and changes in the ways SUD organizations interact with external organizations and individuals. To overcome barriers noted, participants expressed desire (66.7 percent) for teaching tools such as webinars and templates to follow.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SUD treatment organizations began thinking of and planning for proposed changes well before expected implementation of Sec. 3221. Their concerns reflected practicalities of implementation, determining content of law, and wondering about the extent to which it solves problems (improving coordination of care among various providers) or endangered other goals (protecting confidentiality of SUD patient records).</p>","PeriodicalId":40052,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in health information management / AHIMA, American Health Information Management Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9123523/pdf/phim0019-0001b.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in health information management / AHIMA, American Health Information Management Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Learn how substance use disorder (SUD) treatment organizations view and respond to changes in confidentiality and disclosure law following adoption of CARES Act Sec. 3221 and prior to promulgation of revised implementing regulations.

Methods: Online survey followed by informal interviews. Representatives of SUD organizations reported their degree of awareness of Sec. 3221 provisions and their organizations' views on amendments to disclosure practices; current and future changes of organizational policies; difficulties anticipated in implementing new rules; and preferences for resources.

Results: Forty informant surveys on 30 organizations completed. Participants (62.5 percent) indicated being somewhat knowledgeable about Sec. 3221. Evenly divided positive and concerned views on Sec. 3221 reflect tension between preserving confidentiality of patient records and improving coordination of care. Most (76.7 percent) reported organizational discussions on Sec. 3221. Some (30 percent) identified changes to make in near future. Over a third expected few or no barriers to implementing changes to privacy and disclosure practices, while most (64.7 percent) expected hindrances including complexity and tensions in the law, staff education, cost, technological adjustments, and changes in the ways SUD organizations interact with external organizations and individuals. To overcome barriers noted, participants expressed desire (66.7 percent) for teaching tools such as webinars and templates to follow.

Conclusions: SUD treatment organizations began thinking of and planning for proposed changes well before expected implementation of Sec. 3221. Their concerns reflected practicalities of implementation, determining content of law, and wondering about the extent to which it solves problems (improving coordination of care among various providers) or endangered other goals (protecting confidentiality of SUD patient records).

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SUD治疗组织对《护理法案》对患者保密条例的修改的看法和担忧。
目的:了解药物使用障碍(SUD)治疗组织如何看待和应对在《关怀法案》第3221条通过后和颁布修订实施条例之前保密和披露法的变化。方法:在线调查+非正式访谈。SUD组织的代表报告了他们对第3221条规定的了解程度以及他们的组织对修订披露做法的看法;组织政策当前和未来的变化;执行新规则预计会遇到的困难;以及对资源的偏好。结果:完成了对30个组织的40项调查。参与者(62.5%)表示对第3221条有所了解。对第3221条持积极和关注意见的人各占一半,反映了保护病人记录的机密性和改善护理协调之间的紧张关系。大多数(76.7%)报告组织讨论了第3221条。一些人(30%)确定在不久的将来会做出改变。超过三分之一的受访者预计在实施隐私和信息披露实践方面很少或没有障碍,而大多数受访者(64.7%)预计障碍包括法律的复杂性和紧张程度、员工教育、成本、技术调整以及SUD组织与外部组织和个人互动方式的变化。为了克服上述障碍,参与者(66.7%)表示希望使用网络研讨会和模板等教学工具。结论:在第3221节预期实施之前,SUD治疗组织就开始考虑和计划拟议的变更。他们的担忧反映了实施的实用性,确定法律的内容,并想知道它在多大程度上解决了问题(改善不同提供者之间的护理协调)或危及其他目标(保护SUD患者记录的机密性)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Perspectives in Health Information Management is a scholarly, peer-reviewed research journal whose mission is to advance health information management practice and to encourage interdisciplinary collaboration between HIM professionals and others in disciplines supporting the advancement of the management of health information. The primary focus is to promote the linkage of practice, education, and research and to provide contributions to the understanding or improvement of health information management processes and outcomes.
期刊最新文献
The Role of Clinical Decision Support Systems in Preventing Stroke in Primary Care: A Systematic Review. Best Practices for the Design of COVID-19 Dashboards. Medical Scribes: Symptom or Cause of Impeded Evolution of a Transformative Artificial Intelligence in the Electronic Health Record? Risk of Duplicate ICD Codes for Orthopedic and Injury Related Research. Quality Assessment of the Road Traffic Health and Safety Apps with a Focus on the Five Rights of Information Management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1