A Russian Version of the Emotional Autonomy Scale: Primary Adaptation Data.

IF 1.1 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychology in Russia-State of the Art Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.11621/pir.2022.0306

Tatiana Konshina, Tatiana Sadovnikova

{"title":"A Russian Version of the Emotional Autonomy Scale: Primary Adaptation Data.","authors":"Tatiana Konshina, Tatiana Sadovnikova","doi":"10.11621/pir.2022.0306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The formation of emotional autonomy in child-parent relations is one of the main developmental tasks of adolescence (Havighurst, 1972). The theoretical framework of our study comes from the Age-Related Cultural-Historical Approach (Vygotsky, 2000; Leontiev, 1978; Bozhovich, 2009; Elkonin, 1972) and the Theory of Emotional Autonomy Formation by L. Steinberg & S. Silverberg (1986). Here we present the results of a test with the Russian version of the \"Emotional Autonomy Scale\" (EAS) as validated by L. Steinberg & S. Silverberg (1986).Objective: We conducted a substantial psychometric analysis of the EAS scales on a Russian sample.Design: The participants were 222 pupils from the 9th to 11th grades in Moscow schools (age 14-17; M = 15.89; SD = 0.91). A comparative and structural analysis was conducted to review the reliability of the EAS Russian version, administered by the authors.Methods: The pupils were evaluated with 1) the authors' Russian version of the EAS by L. Steinberg & S. Silverberg (1986); and 2) the Parent-Child Interaction questionnaire (PCI) by I. Markovskaya (1999).Results: The fit of Steinberg's original Four-factor model (L. Steinberg & S. Silverberg, 1986) and of the Beyers' and colleagues' Seven-factor model (2005) were studied on a Russian sample for the first time. The Four-factor model was chosen as the final model due to better fit indices and Cronbach's alpha coefficient. The CFA showed the model fit indices to be acceptable (RMSEA = 0.07) or slightly less than the good fit values (CFI = 0.74). The validity analysis was conducted using the PCI by I. Markovskaya (1999).Conclusion: The aim of theoretical analysis, approbation, and validation of the EAS on a Russian sample was achieved: the authors' version of the EAS is a valid and reliable instrument to measure adolescents' emotional autonomy in a Russian sample.","PeriodicalId":44621,"journal":{"name":"Psychology in Russia-State of the Art","volume":"15 3","pages":"91-110"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9833612/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology in Russia-State of the Art","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2022.0306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The formation of emotional autonomy in child-parent relations is one of the main developmental tasks of adolescence (Havighurst, 1972). The theoretical framework of our study comes from the Age-Related Cultural-Historical Approach (Vygotsky, 2000; Leontiev, 1978; Bozhovich, 2009; Elkonin, 1972) and the Theory of Emotional Autonomy Formation by L. Steinberg & S. Silverberg (1986). Here we present the results of a test with the Russian version of the "Emotional Autonomy Scale" (EAS) as validated by L. Steinberg & S. Silverberg (1986).

Objective: We conducted a substantial psychometric analysis of the EAS scales on a Russian sample.

Design: The participants were 222 pupils from the 9th to 11th grades in Moscow schools (age 14-17; M = 15.89; SD = 0.91). A comparative and structural analysis was conducted to review the reliability of the EAS Russian version, administered by the authors.

Methods: The pupils were evaluated with 1) the authors' Russian version of the EAS by L. Steinberg & S. Silverberg (1986); and 2) the Parent-Child Interaction questionnaire (PCI) by I. Markovskaya (1999).

Results: The fit of Steinberg's original Four-factor model (L. Steinberg & S. Silverberg, 1986) and of the Beyers' and colleagues' Seven-factor model (2005) were studied on a Russian sample for the first time. The Four-factor model was chosen as the final model due to better fit indices and Cronbach's alpha coefficient. The CFA showed the model fit indices to be acceptable (RMSEA = 0.07) or slightly less than the good fit values (CFI = 0.74). The validity analysis was conducted using the PCI by I. Markovskaya (1999).

Conclusion: The aim of theoretical analysis, approbation, and validation of the EAS on a Russian sample was achieved: the authors' version of the EAS is a valid and reliable instrument to measure adolescents' emotional autonomy in a Russian sample.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

俄语版情绪自主量表:初步适应数据。

背景:亲子关系中情绪自主性的形成是青少年发展的主要任务之一(Havighurst, 1972)。本研究的理论框架来自与年龄相关的文化历史方法(Vygotsky, 2000;Leontiev, 1978;Bozhovich, 2009;Elkonin(1972)和L. Steinberg & S. Silverberg(1986)的情绪自主性形成理论。在此，我们采用经L. Steinberg和S. Silverberg(1986)验证的俄罗斯版“情绪自主量表”(EAS)进行测试。目的:我们对俄罗斯样本进行了大量的EAS量表心理测量分析。设计:参与者是222名莫斯科学校9年级到11年级的学生(14-17岁;M = 15.89;Sd = 0.91)。比较和结构分析进行了审查的可靠性EAS俄罗斯版本，由作者管理。方法:使用1)作者的俄语版EAS量表(L. Steinberg & S. Silverberg(1986))对小学生进行评估;2) Markovskaya(1999)的亲子互动问卷(PCI)。结果:首次在俄罗斯样本上研究了Steinberg原始的四因素模型(L. Steinberg & S. Silverberg, 1986)和Beyers及其同事的七因素模型(2005)的拟合。由于拟合指数和Cronbach’s alpha系数较好，最终选择四因素模型作为最终模型。CFA显示模型拟合指数为可接受(RMSEA = 0.07)或略低于良好拟合值(CFI = 0.74)。I. Markovskaya(1999)使用PCI进行效度分析。结论:对俄罗斯样本的情绪自主量表进行理论分析、认可和验证的目的达到了:作者版本的情绪自主量表是测量俄罗斯样本青少年情绪自主的有效和可靠的工具。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Psychology in Russia-State of the Art PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

2.00

自引率

11.10%

发文量

审稿时长

14 weeks

期刊介绍： Established in 2008, the Russian Psychological Society''s Journal «Psychology in Russia: State of the Art» publishes original research on all aspects of general psychology including cognitive, clinical, developmental, social, neuropsychology, psychophysiology, psychology of labor and ergonomics, and methodology of psychological science. Journal''s list of authors comprises prominent scientists, practitioners and experts from leading Russian universities, research institutions, state ministries and private practice. Addressing current challenges of psychology, it also reviews developments in novel areas such as security, sport, and art psychology, as well as psychology of negotiations, cyberspace and virtual reality. The journal builds upon theoretical foundations laid by the works of Vygotsky, Luria and other Russian scientists whose works contributed to shaping the psychological science worldwide, and welcomes international submissions which make major contributions across the range of psychology, especially appreciating the ones conducted in the paradigm of the Russian psychological tradition. It enjoys a wide international readership and features reports of empirical studies, book reviews and theoretical contributions, which aim to further our understanding of psychology.