Evaluating a Novel EEG-Based Index for Stroke Detection Under Anesthesia During Mechanical Thrombectomy.

IF 2.3 2区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-21 DOI:10.1097/ANA.0000000000000889
Dana Baron Shahaf, Eitan Abergel, Rotem Sivan Hoffmann, Eran Meirovitch, Steven Konstadt, Dennis E Feierman, Raphaell Derman, Goded Shahaf
{"title":"Evaluating a Novel EEG-Based Index for Stroke Detection Under Anesthesia During Mechanical Thrombectomy.","authors":"Dana Baron Shahaf, Eitan Abergel, Rotem Sivan Hoffmann, Eran Meirovitch, Steven Konstadt, Dennis E Feierman, Raphaell Derman, Goded Shahaf","doi":"10.1097/ANA.0000000000000889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The rapid identification of acute stroke (AS) during and after anesthesia might lead to early interventions and improved outcomes. We investigated a novel 2-channel electroencephalogram (EEG)-based marker for stroke detection—the lateral interconnection ratio (LIR)—in AS patients having endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) with general anesthesia (GA) or sedation. The LIR in 2 reference groups of patients without postoperative neurological complications was used for comparison. Methods: The National Institutes of Health stroke scale score was assessed before and after thrombectomy in 100 patients having EVT with GA or sedation. The EEG was monitored during and for 4 hours following EVT in the AS group and during surgery in the 2 reference groups. We compared: (1) LIR between AS and reference groups; (2) LIR and stroke dynamics (clinical improvement or deterioration after EVT assessed by the National Institutes of Health stroke scale score); (3) the impact of stroke site (anterior vs. posterior circulation) and anesthesia type (GA vs. sedation) on the LIR. Results: Median (interquartile range) LIR was lower in patients with AS compared with reference patients (0.09, 0.05 to 0.16 vs. 0.39, 0.24 to 0.52, respectively; P<0.000002), and LIR increased in AS patients whose clinical status recovered after EVT compared with nonrecovered patients (0.20, 0.12 to 0.29 vs. 0.09, 0.05 to 0.11, respectively; P<0.007). The LIR might be more sensitive to anterior circulation stroke but is not impacted by anesthesia type. Conclusions: We demonstrated the utility of using AS patients undergoing EVT as a platform for assessing a novel EEG marker for the identification of stroke during anesthesia. Further, large-scale studies in AS patients during EVT and in patients undergoing different surgeries and anesthesia are required to validate the LIR.","PeriodicalId":16550,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"60-68"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0000000000000889","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The rapid identification of acute stroke (AS) during and after anesthesia might lead to early interventions and improved outcomes. We investigated a novel 2-channel electroencephalogram (EEG)-based marker for stroke detection—the lateral interconnection ratio (LIR)—in AS patients having endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) with general anesthesia (GA) or sedation. The LIR in 2 reference groups of patients without postoperative neurological complications was used for comparison. Methods: The National Institutes of Health stroke scale score was assessed before and after thrombectomy in 100 patients having EVT with GA or sedation. The EEG was monitored during and for 4 hours following EVT in the AS group and during surgery in the 2 reference groups. We compared: (1) LIR between AS and reference groups; (2) LIR and stroke dynamics (clinical improvement or deterioration after EVT assessed by the National Institutes of Health stroke scale score); (3) the impact of stroke site (anterior vs. posterior circulation) and anesthesia type (GA vs. sedation) on the LIR. Results: Median (interquartile range) LIR was lower in patients with AS compared with reference patients (0.09, 0.05 to 0.16 vs. 0.39, 0.24 to 0.52, respectively; P<0.000002), and LIR increased in AS patients whose clinical status recovered after EVT compared with nonrecovered patients (0.20, 0.12 to 0.29 vs. 0.09, 0.05 to 0.11, respectively; P<0.007). The LIR might be more sensitive to anterior circulation stroke but is not impacted by anesthesia type. Conclusions: We demonstrated the utility of using AS patients undergoing EVT as a platform for assessing a novel EEG marker for the identification of stroke during anesthesia. Further, large-scale studies in AS patients during EVT and in patients undergoing different surgeries and anesthesia are required to validate the LIR.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估一种新的基于脑电图的机械取栓麻醉下脑卒中检测指标。
背景:在麻醉期间和麻醉后快速识别急性卒中(AS)可能导致早期干预和改善预后。我们研究了一种新的基于2通道脑电图(EEG)的脑卒中检测标志物——侧互联比率(LIR)——用于在全身麻醉(GA)或镇静下进行血管内取栓(EVT)的AS患者。比较两组无术后神经系统并发症患者的LIR。方法:对100例经GA或镇静治疗的EVT患者取栓前后进行美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分。AS组在EVT期间和EVT后4小时监测脑电图,2个参照组在手术期间监测脑电图。我们比较:(1)AS组与参照组的LIR;(2) LIR与脑卒中动态(EVT后临床改善或恶化由美国国立卫生研究院脑卒中量表评分评估);(3)卒中部位(前循环vs后循环)和麻醉类型(GA vs镇静)对LIR的影响。结果:AS患者的中位(四分位间距)LIR低于对照患者(分别为0.09,0.05 ~ 0.16 vs. 0.39, 0.24 ~ 0.52;结论:我们证明了使用接受EVT的AS患者作为评估麻醉期间卒中识别的新型脑电图标记物的平台的实用性。此外,需要对EVT期间的AS患者以及接受不同手术和麻醉的患者进行大规模研究来验证LIR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
10.80%
发文量
119
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology (JNA) is a peer-reviewed publication directed to an audience of neuroanesthesiologists, neurosurgeons, neurosurgical monitoring specialists, neurosurgical support staff, and Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit personnel. The journal publishes original peer-reviewed studies in the form of Clinical Investigations, Laboratory Investigations, Clinical Reports, Review Articles, Journal Club synopses of current literature from related journals, presentation of Points of View on controversial issues, Book Reviews, Correspondence, and Abstracts from affiliated neuroanesthesiology societies. JNA is the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care, the Neuroanaesthesia and Critical Care Society of Great Britain and Ireland, the Association de Neuro-Anesthésiologie Réanimation de langue Française, the Wissenschaftlicher Arbeitskreis Neuroanästhesie der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizen, the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutschsprachiger Neuroanästhesisten und Neuro-Intensivmediziner, the Korean Society of Neuroanesthesia, the Japanese Society of Neuroanesthesia and Critical Care, the Neuroanesthesiology Chapter of the Colegio Mexicano de Anesthesiología, the Indian Society of Neuroanesthesiology and Critical Care, and the Thai Society for Neuroanesthesia.
期刊最新文献
Intraoperative Burst Suppression by Analysis of Raw Electroencephalogram Postoperative Delirium in Older Adults Undergoing Spine Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Enhanced Recovery After Craniotomy: Global Practices, Challenges, and Perspectives. Time to Wake Up to Remimazolam's Potential. Duplex Ultrasound Screening for Deep Venous Thrombosis in Patients Undergoing Craniotomy for Intracranial Tumors: A Single Institutional Series. Development and Validation of a Two-step Model to Predict Outcomes After Endovascular Treatment for Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1