Dana Baron Shahaf, Eitan Abergel, Rotem Sivan Hoffmann, Eran Meirovitch, Steven Konstadt, Dennis E Feierman, Raphaell Derman, Goded Shahaf
{"title":"Evaluating a Novel EEG-Based Index for Stroke Detection Under Anesthesia During Mechanical Thrombectomy.","authors":"Dana Baron Shahaf, Eitan Abergel, Rotem Sivan Hoffmann, Eran Meirovitch, Steven Konstadt, Dennis E Feierman, Raphaell Derman, Goded Shahaf","doi":"10.1097/ANA.0000000000000889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The rapid identification of acute stroke (AS) during and after anesthesia might lead to early interventions and improved outcomes. We investigated a novel 2-channel electroencephalogram (EEG)-based marker for stroke detection—the lateral interconnection ratio (LIR)—in AS patients having endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) with general anesthesia (GA) or sedation. The LIR in 2 reference groups of patients without postoperative neurological complications was used for comparison. Methods: The National Institutes of Health stroke scale score was assessed before and after thrombectomy in 100 patients having EVT with GA or sedation. The EEG was monitored during and for 4 hours following EVT in the AS group and during surgery in the 2 reference groups. We compared: (1) LIR between AS and reference groups; (2) LIR and stroke dynamics (clinical improvement or deterioration after EVT assessed by the National Institutes of Health stroke scale score); (3) the impact of stroke site (anterior vs. posterior circulation) and anesthesia type (GA vs. sedation) on the LIR. Results: Median (interquartile range) LIR was lower in patients with AS compared with reference patients (0.09, 0.05 to 0.16 vs. 0.39, 0.24 to 0.52, respectively; P<0.000002), and LIR increased in AS patients whose clinical status recovered after EVT compared with nonrecovered patients (0.20, 0.12 to 0.29 vs. 0.09, 0.05 to 0.11, respectively; P<0.007). The LIR might be more sensitive to anterior circulation stroke but is not impacted by anesthesia type. Conclusions: We demonstrated the utility of using AS patients undergoing EVT as a platform for assessing a novel EEG marker for the identification of stroke during anesthesia. Further, large-scale studies in AS patients during EVT and in patients undergoing different surgeries and anesthesia are required to validate the LIR.","PeriodicalId":16550,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"60-68"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0000000000000889","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Background: The rapid identification of acute stroke (AS) during and after anesthesia might lead to early interventions and improved outcomes. We investigated a novel 2-channel electroencephalogram (EEG)-based marker for stroke detection—the lateral interconnection ratio (LIR)—in AS patients having endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) with general anesthesia (GA) or sedation. The LIR in 2 reference groups of patients without postoperative neurological complications was used for comparison. Methods: The National Institutes of Health stroke scale score was assessed before and after thrombectomy in 100 patients having EVT with GA or sedation. The EEG was monitored during and for 4 hours following EVT in the AS group and during surgery in the 2 reference groups. We compared: (1) LIR between AS and reference groups; (2) LIR and stroke dynamics (clinical improvement or deterioration after EVT assessed by the National Institutes of Health stroke scale score); (3) the impact of stroke site (anterior vs. posterior circulation) and anesthesia type (GA vs. sedation) on the LIR. Results: Median (interquartile range) LIR was lower in patients with AS compared with reference patients (0.09, 0.05 to 0.16 vs. 0.39, 0.24 to 0.52, respectively; P<0.000002), and LIR increased in AS patients whose clinical status recovered after EVT compared with nonrecovered patients (0.20, 0.12 to 0.29 vs. 0.09, 0.05 to 0.11, respectively; P<0.007). The LIR might be more sensitive to anterior circulation stroke but is not impacted by anesthesia type. Conclusions: We demonstrated the utility of using AS patients undergoing EVT as a platform for assessing a novel EEG marker for the identification of stroke during anesthesia. Further, large-scale studies in AS patients during EVT and in patients undergoing different surgeries and anesthesia are required to validate the LIR.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology (JNA) is a peer-reviewed publication directed to an audience of neuroanesthesiologists, neurosurgeons, neurosurgical monitoring specialists, neurosurgical support staff, and Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit personnel. The journal publishes original peer-reviewed studies in the form of Clinical Investigations, Laboratory Investigations, Clinical Reports, Review Articles, Journal Club synopses of current literature from related journals, presentation of Points of View on controversial issues, Book Reviews, Correspondence, and Abstracts from affiliated neuroanesthesiology societies.
JNA is the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care, the Neuroanaesthesia and Critical Care Society of Great Britain and Ireland, the Association de Neuro-Anesthésiologie Réanimation de langue Française, the Wissenschaftlicher Arbeitskreis Neuroanästhesie der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizen, the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutschsprachiger Neuroanästhesisten und Neuro-Intensivmediziner, the Korean Society of Neuroanesthesia, the Japanese Society of Neuroanesthesia and Critical Care, the Neuroanesthesiology Chapter of the Colegio Mexicano de Anesthesiología, the Indian Society of Neuroanesthesiology and Critical Care, and the Thai Society for Neuroanesthesia.