Access to Medication Abortion: Now More Important Than Ever.

IF 0.5 4区 社会学 Q3 LAW American Journal of Law & Medicine Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.1017/amj.2022.24
Rebecca Fliegel
{"title":"Access to Medication Abortion: Now More Important Than Ever.","authors":"Rebecca Fliegel","doi":"10.1017/amj.2022.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2017, 39% of all abortions in the United States were medication abortions, a safe and effective option for those seeking abortions through up to ten weeks of pregnancy.2 The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved medication abortion, composed of a combination of mifepristone and misoprostol, in 2000, making the method available for the first time.3 The FDA’s choice to approve medication abortion gave abortion activists hope that abortion would bemore readily accessible.4 One of the many barriers to abortion is the social outing one must undertake when visiting a doctor’s office to obtain the procedure—visits often accompanied by protestors outside those offices shouting at the patient. Medication abortion allows for patients to essentially perform their abortions privately, in their own homes, without suffering that social condemnation.5 However, starting in 2004, numerous states began restricting access to medication abortion.6 Many states require that medication abortion only be prescribed and administered7 by a physician who is in the same room as the patient, which essentially prevents physician assistants or advanced practice nurses from prescribing the medication, and any clinician from prescribing and administering the medication via telemedicine.8 These restrictions became problematic during the COVID-19 pandemic when doctors’ offices were either closed or dangerous places to visit for people with certain health conditions.9","PeriodicalId":7680,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Law & Medicine","volume":"48 2-3","pages":"286-304"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Law & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/amj.2022.24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In 2017, 39% of all abortions in the United States were medication abortions, a safe and effective option for those seeking abortions through up to ten weeks of pregnancy.2 The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved medication abortion, composed of a combination of mifepristone and misoprostol, in 2000, making the method available for the first time.3 The FDA’s choice to approve medication abortion gave abortion activists hope that abortion would bemore readily accessible.4 One of the many barriers to abortion is the social outing one must undertake when visiting a doctor’s office to obtain the procedure—visits often accompanied by protestors outside those offices shouting at the patient. Medication abortion allows for patients to essentially perform their abortions privately, in their own homes, without suffering that social condemnation.5 However, starting in 2004, numerous states began restricting access to medication abortion.6 Many states require that medication abortion only be prescribed and administered7 by a physician who is in the same room as the patient, which essentially prevents physician assistants or advanced practice nurses from prescribing the medication, and any clinician from prescribing and administering the medication via telemedicine.8 These restrictions became problematic during the COVID-19 pandemic when doctors’ offices were either closed or dangerous places to visit for people with certain health conditions.9
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
获得药物流产:现在比以往任何时候都更重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: desde Enero 2004 Último Numero: Octubre 2008 AJLM will solicit blind comments from expert peer reviewers, including faculty members of our editorial board, as well as from other preeminent health law and public policy academics and professionals from across the country and around the world.
期刊最新文献
A Protected Class, An Unprotected Condition, and A Biomarker - A Method/Formula for Increased Diversity in Clinical Trials for the African American Subject with Benign Ethnic Neutropenia (BEN) - CORRIGENDUM. "The Timeless Explosion of Fantasy's Dream": How State Courts Have Ignored the Supreme Court's Decision in Panetti v. Quarterman - ERRATUM. Mental Health Matters: A Look At Abortion Law Post-Dobbs - ERRATUM. Abortion Access for Women in Custody in the Wake of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health. How The "Great Resignation" and COVID Unemployment Have Eroded the Employer Sponsored Insurance Model and Access to Healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1