Awareness of inappropriate use related to antimicrobial resistance among medical doctors by country economic status: A systematic review.

Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3233/JRS-220044
Winthrop Taylor, Lisa-Marie Whittaker, Trevon Fletcher, Anthony Collins, Ryan Grant, Maxine Gossell-Williams
{"title":"Awareness of inappropriate use related to antimicrobial resistance among medical doctors by country economic status: A systematic review.","authors":"Winthrop Taylor,&nbsp;Lisa-Marie Whittaker,&nbsp;Trevon Fletcher,&nbsp;Anthony Collins,&nbsp;Ryan Grant,&nbsp;Maxine Gossell-Williams","doi":"10.3233/JRS-220044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is promoted by inappropriate use and is a greater burden for low to middle income countries (LMIC) than high income countries (HIC).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review aimed to compare the awareness of inappropriate use related to AMR among medical doctors from LMIC and HIC using published knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, sequential systematic literature search of PubMed and Web of Science databases for articles published since inception up to June 1, 2022 for KAP studies involving medical doctors. Using fifteen KAP items related to promoting AMR, data on proportion of participants responding affirmatively was extracted and reported using means, ranges and 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-two studies met the inclusion criteria and involved 13,089 medical doctors from 11HIC and 21LMIC. All were cross-sectional studies, 71.4% involved non-probability sampling and 78.6% were of satisfactory quality. Knowledge items showed mean proportion of more medical doctors responding correctly. Similar affirmation trends were observed for attitude and prescribing practice items. Awareness appeared similar between medical doctors of the economic groups, except for a greater interest in training for LMIC (95.4%; 95%CI 93.0%, 97.9%) versus HIC (81.7%; 95%CI 65.6%, 97.9%). Countries with poor proportions were identified in both economic groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For identified studies, trends suggest good awareness among medical doctors of the known inappropriate use and perceived threat of AMR, as well as prescribing practices to reduce the risk of AMR. Trends were similar across HIC and LMIC; however, countries with evidence of poor awareness exist in both economic groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/JRS-220044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is promoted by inappropriate use and is a greater burden for low to middle income countries (LMIC) than high income countries (HIC).

Objective: This systematic review aimed to compare the awareness of inappropriate use related to AMR among medical doctors from LMIC and HIC using published knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) studies.

Methods: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, sequential systematic literature search of PubMed and Web of Science databases for articles published since inception up to June 1, 2022 for KAP studies involving medical doctors. Using fifteen KAP items related to promoting AMR, data on proportion of participants responding affirmatively was extracted and reported using means, ranges and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results: Forty-two studies met the inclusion criteria and involved 13,089 medical doctors from 11HIC and 21LMIC. All were cross-sectional studies, 71.4% involved non-probability sampling and 78.6% were of satisfactory quality. Knowledge items showed mean proportion of more medical doctors responding correctly. Similar affirmation trends were observed for attitude and prescribing practice items. Awareness appeared similar between medical doctors of the economic groups, except for a greater interest in training for LMIC (95.4%; 95%CI 93.0%, 97.9%) versus HIC (81.7%; 95%CI 65.6%, 97.9%). Countries with poor proportions were identified in both economic groups.

Conclusion: For identified studies, trends suggest good awareness among medical doctors of the known inappropriate use and perceived threat of AMR, as well as prescribing practices to reduce the risk of AMR. Trends were similar across HIC and LMIC; however, countries with evidence of poor awareness exist in both economic groups.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
按国家经济状况划分的医生对与抗菌药物耐药性相关的不当使用的认识:一项系统综述。
背景:抗菌药物耐药性(AMR)因使用不当而增加,对中低收入国家(LMIC)来说比高收入国家(HIC)负担更大。目的:本系统综述旨在利用已发表的知识、态度和实践(KAP)研究,比较LMIC和HIC医生对AMR相关不当使用的认识。方法:遵循系统评价的首选报告项目和荟萃分析指南,在PubMed和Web of Science数据库中连续系统检索自成立以来至2022年6月1日发表的涉及医生的KAP研究的文章。使用与促进AMR相关的15个KAP项目,提取并报告了参与者肯定回答比例的数据,使用平均值、范围和95%置信区间(CI)。结果:42项研究符合纳入标准,涉及来自11HIC和21LMIC的13089名医生。所有研究都是横断面研究,71.4%涉及非概率抽样,78.6%的研究质量令人满意。知识项目显示了更多医生正确回答的平均比例。态度和处方实践项目也出现了类似的肯定趋势。经济群体的医生之间的意识似乎相似,只是对LMIC培训的兴趣更大(95.4%;95%CI 93.0%,97.9%),而对HIC培训的兴趣更强(81.7%;95%CI 65.6%,97.9%。结论:对于已确定的研究,趋势表明医生对已知的AMR的不当使用和感知的威胁有着良好的认识,并制定了降低AMR风险的处方。HIC和LMIC的趋势相似;然而,有证据表明这两个经济集团都存在认识不足的国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1