Identification of Independent Predictors of Increased 90-Day Complication and Revision Rates Following Total Elbow Arthroplasty.

Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty Pub Date : 2023-01-26 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/24715492231152146
Bryce F Kunkle, Nicholas A Baxter, Megan E Welsh, Richard J Friedman, Josef K Eichinger
{"title":"Identification of Independent Predictors of Increased 90-Day Complication and Revision Rates Following Total Elbow Arthroplasty.","authors":"Bryce F Kunkle, Nicholas A Baxter, Megan E Welsh, Richard J Friedman, Josef K Eichinger","doi":"10.1177/24715492231152146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is an increasingly popular surgical option for many debilitating conditions of the elbow. There currently exists a paucity of literature regarding patient and hospital factors that lead to inferior outcomes following TEA. The purpose of this study is to identify independent predictors of increased complication and revision rates following TEA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The National Readmissions Database (NRD) was queried from 2011 to 2018 to identify all cases of TEA (n = 8932). Relevant patient demographic factors, comorbidities, and hospital characteristics were identified and run in a univariate binomial logistic regression model. All significant variables were included in a multivariate binomial logistic regression model for data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Independent predictors of increased complication rates included age, female sex, Medicare and Medicaid payer status, medium bed-sized center, and 18 of 34 medical comorbidities (all <i>P</i> < .05). Independent predictors of increased revision rates included medium bed-sized centers, non-teaching hospital status, chronic pulmonary disease, depression, and pulmonary circulatory disorders (all <i>P</i> < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study identified several patient and hospital characteristics that are independently associated with both increased complication and revision rates following TEA. This information can aid orthopedic surgeons during shared decision making when considering TEA in patients.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, retrospective cohort study.</p>","PeriodicalId":73942,"journal":{"name":"Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/96/dc/10.1177_24715492231152146.PMC9884946.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24715492231152146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is an increasingly popular surgical option for many debilitating conditions of the elbow. There currently exists a paucity of literature regarding patient and hospital factors that lead to inferior outcomes following TEA. The purpose of this study is to identify independent predictors of increased complication and revision rates following TEA.

Methods: The National Readmissions Database (NRD) was queried from 2011 to 2018 to identify all cases of TEA (n = 8932). Relevant patient demographic factors, comorbidities, and hospital characteristics were identified and run in a univariate binomial logistic regression model. All significant variables were included in a multivariate binomial logistic regression model for data analysis.

Results: Independent predictors of increased complication rates included age, female sex, Medicare and Medicaid payer status, medium bed-sized center, and 18 of 34 medical comorbidities (all P < .05). Independent predictors of increased revision rates included medium bed-sized centers, non-teaching hospital status, chronic pulmonary disease, depression, and pulmonary circulatory disorders (all P < .05).

Conclusion: This study identified several patient and hospital characteristics that are independently associated with both increased complication and revision rates following TEA. This information can aid orthopedic surgeons during shared decision making when considering TEA in patients.

Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
识别全肘关节置换术后 90 天并发症和翻修率增加的独立预测因素。
简介:全肘关节置换术(TEA)是治疗许多肘关节衰弱疾病的一种日益流行的手术方式。目前,有关导致 TEA 术后效果不佳的患者和医院因素的文献极少。本研究的目的是找出导致 TEA 术后并发症和翻修率增加的独立预测因素:方法:查询了2011年至2018年的国家再入院数据库(NRD),以确定所有TEA病例(n = 8932)。确定了相关的患者人口学因素、合并症和医院特征,并在单变量二项逻辑回归模型中运行。所有重要变量均纳入多变量二项逻辑回归模型进行数据分析:结果:并发症发生率增加的独立预测因素包括年龄、女性性别、医疗保险和医疗补助支付者身份、中等床位规模的中心以及 34 种并发症中的 18 种(均为 P P 结论:该研究确定了患者和医院的几个特征,并对这些特征进行了分析:本研究发现了一些患者和医院的特征,这些特征与TEA术后并发症和翻修率的增加有独立关联。这些信息有助于骨科医生在考虑对患者进行TEA治疗时做出共同决策:III级,回顾性队列研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Locked Stem Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Complex Proximal Humerus Fracture in the Elderly: Clinical and Radiological Short-Term Results. Corticosteroid Infiltration to Treat Shoulder Stiffness After Rotator Cuff Repair. Modified Weaver Dunn Versus Ligamentous Reconstruction Grafts in Chronic Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies. Short-Term Radiographic Outcomes of Bone Versus Metallic Augmented, Central Screw Type Baseplate in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Matched Case-Control Study. Distal Clavicular Resection Worsens Outcomes in Rotator Cuff Repair: A National Database Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1