Views of physiotherapists on factors that play a role in ethical decision-making: an international online survey study.

IF 2.1 Q1 REHABILITATION Archives of physiotherapy Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.1186/s40945-022-00157-y
Andrea Sturm, Roswith Roth, Amanda Louise Ager
{"title":"Views of physiotherapists on factors that play a role in ethical decision-making: an international online survey study.","authors":"Andrea Sturm,&nbsp;Roswith Roth,&nbsp;Amanda Louise Ager","doi":"10.1186/s40945-022-00157-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a lack of knowledge about the ways physiotherapists around the world learn about professional code of ethics and ethical decision-making frameworks. The profession has a gap in the understanding about physiotherapists' views on factors that play a role in ethical decision-making and whether these views differ between World Physiotherapy regions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey study in English was conducted from October 2018 to October 2019. Participants included 559 physiotherapists located in 72 countries. The self-designed survey questionnaire contained 13 items asking about demographic information and means of learning about ethical codes and decision-making frameworks. A further 30 items were presented which included statements underpinned with individual, organisational, situational and societal factors influencing ethical decision-making. Participants were asked to express their level of agreement or disagreement using a 5-point-Likert-scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants' highest rated responses endorsed that the professional role of physiotherapists is linked to social expectations of ethical behaviour and that ethical decision-making requires more skills than simply following a code of ethics. A recognisable organisational ethical culture was rated as supporting good ethical decisions. Comparing responses by World Physiotherapy regions showed significant differences in factors such as culture, religion, emotions, organisational values, significant others, consequences of professional misconduct and professional obligations. Entry level education was not perceived to provide a solid base for ethical decision-making in every World Physiotherapy region. Participants reported multiple sources for learning about a professional code of ethics and ethical decision-making frameworks. What's more, the number of sources differed between World Physiotherapy regions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multiple factors play a role in physiotherapists' ethical decision-making internationally. Physiotherapists' ethical knowledge is informed by, and acquired from, several learning sources, which differ in both quality and quantity amongst World Physiotherapy regions. Easily accessible knowledge and education about professional codes of ethics and ethical decision-making can foster continuing professional development for physiotherapists. The establishment of constructive ethical cultures in workplaces can improve ethical decision-making, and should acknowledge the influence of individual, organisational, situational and societal factors. The establishment of collaborative learning environments can support knowledge translation which acknowledges practice-based methods of knowing and learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":72290,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physiotherapy","volume":"13 1","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9889242/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40945-022-00157-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: There is a lack of knowledge about the ways physiotherapists around the world learn about professional code of ethics and ethical decision-making frameworks. The profession has a gap in the understanding about physiotherapists' views on factors that play a role in ethical decision-making and whether these views differ between World Physiotherapy regions.

Methods: An online survey study in English was conducted from October 2018 to October 2019. Participants included 559 physiotherapists located in 72 countries. The self-designed survey questionnaire contained 13 items asking about demographic information and means of learning about ethical codes and decision-making frameworks. A further 30 items were presented which included statements underpinned with individual, organisational, situational and societal factors influencing ethical decision-making. Participants were asked to express their level of agreement or disagreement using a 5-point-Likert-scale.

Results: Participants' highest rated responses endorsed that the professional role of physiotherapists is linked to social expectations of ethical behaviour and that ethical decision-making requires more skills than simply following a code of ethics. A recognisable organisational ethical culture was rated as supporting good ethical decisions. Comparing responses by World Physiotherapy regions showed significant differences in factors such as culture, religion, emotions, organisational values, significant others, consequences of professional misconduct and professional obligations. Entry level education was not perceived to provide a solid base for ethical decision-making in every World Physiotherapy region. Participants reported multiple sources for learning about a professional code of ethics and ethical decision-making frameworks. What's more, the number of sources differed between World Physiotherapy regions.

Conclusions: Multiple factors play a role in physiotherapists' ethical decision-making internationally. Physiotherapists' ethical knowledge is informed by, and acquired from, several learning sources, which differ in both quality and quantity amongst World Physiotherapy regions. Easily accessible knowledge and education about professional codes of ethics and ethical decision-making can foster continuing professional development for physiotherapists. The establishment of constructive ethical cultures in workplaces can improve ethical decision-making, and should acknowledge the influence of individual, organisational, situational and societal factors. The establishment of collaborative learning environments can support knowledge translation which acknowledges practice-based methods of knowing and learning.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
物理治疗师对道德决策中起作用的因素的看法:一项国际在线调查研究。
背景:世界各地的物理治疗师学习职业道德准则和道德决策框架的方式缺乏知识。对于物理治疗师对伦理决策中起作用的因素的看法,以及这些观点在世界物理治疗地区之间是否存在差异,该行业的理解存在差距。方法:于2018年10月至2019年10月进行英文在线调查研究。参与者包括来自72个国家的559名物理治疗师。自行设计的调查问卷包含13个项目,询问人口统计信息以及了解道德准则和决策框架的方法。另外还提出了30个项目,其中包括影响道德决策的个人、组织、情境和社会因素的陈述。参与者被要求用5分李克特量表表达他们的同意或不同意程度。结果:参与者的最高评价表明,物理治疗师的职业角色与社会对道德行为的期望有关,而道德决策需要更多的技能,而不仅仅是遵循道德准则。认可的组织道德文化被评为支持良好的道德决策。对比世界物理治疗地区的反应,发现在文化、宗教、情感、组织价值观、重要他人、职业不当行为的后果和职业义务等因素上存在显著差异。在每个世界物理治疗地区,入门级教育并没有被认为是伦理决策的坚实基础。参与者报告了学习职业道德准则和道德决策框架的多种来源。更重要的是,世界物理治疗地区之间的来源数量不同。结论:多种因素影响着国际物理治疗师的伦理决策。物理治疗师的道德知识是由几个学习来源提供的,这些学习来源在世界物理治疗地区的质量和数量上都有所不同。容易获得的专业道德规范和道德决策的知识和教育可以促进物理治疗师的持续专业发展。在工作场所建立建设性的道德文化可以改善道德决策,并应承认个人、组织、情境和社会因素的影响。协作学习环境的建立可以支持知识翻译,它承认基于实践的认识和学习方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Indoor and outdoor 10-Meter Walk Test and Timed Up and Go in patients after total hip arthroplasty: a reliability and comparative study. Erratum in: Pragmatism in manual therapy trials for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Intra- and inter-rater reliability of goniometric finger range of motion using a written protocol. A decade of growth: preserving the original meaning of research for physiotherapists. Neurological conditions and community-based physical activity: physical therapists' belief and actions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1