Translating One Health knowledge across different institutional and political contexts in Europe.

Sarah Humboldt-Dachroeden
{"title":"Translating One Health knowledge across different institutional and political contexts in Europe.","authors":"Sarah Humboldt-Dachroeden","doi":"10.1186/s42522-022-00074-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Implementing a One Health approach is complex. It demands engaging different sectors and actors in the promotion and protection of human, animal and environmental health. A key challenge for successfully implementing the One Health approach are knowledge translation processes among scientists and policy-makers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey reached 104 experts from 23 European countries, working at national agencies or institutes, universities, ministries, non-governmental organisations (World Health Organization, World Organisation for Animal Health), and European Union (EU) agencies. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were conducted to describe experts' perceptions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study indicated a lack of networks among scientists and between scientists and policy-makers. Relations of scientists and policy-makers were perceived as challenging due to different interests and priorities, leading to difficulties in reaching political attention for One Health topics. It also highlighted a favoured attention to some One Health topics (e.g. antimicrobial resistance) as opposed to others (e.g. environmental issues). Important international actors to push One Health policies forward were the Quadripartite organisations and EU agencies. National actors (government agencies, national research institutes, universities) were on average perceived to be more important than international actors due to their roles and influences. Factors influencing the knowledge translation process were the different languages spoken by scientists as well as politicians, and an equivocal understanding of the One Health approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study shows the importance of leadership to establish interdisciplinary networks and to problematise One Health issues with clear scope and targets. This will help to link knowledge to needs and capabilities of policy-makers. Establishing strong relationships among national and international actors can encourage networks and raise awareness of the One Health approach to policy-makers. Lastly, promoting research communication skills of scientists can provide a valuable tool to reach policy-makers to enhance attention to One Health topics.</p>","PeriodicalId":19490,"journal":{"name":"One Health Outlook","volume":"5 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9890731/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"One Health Outlook","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42522-022-00074-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Implementing a One Health approach is complex. It demands engaging different sectors and actors in the promotion and protection of human, animal and environmental health. A key challenge for successfully implementing the One Health approach are knowledge translation processes among scientists and policy-makers.

Methods: An online survey reached 104 experts from 23 European countries, working at national agencies or institutes, universities, ministries, non-governmental organisations (World Health Organization, World Organisation for Animal Health), and European Union (EU) agencies. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were conducted to describe experts' perceptions.

Results: This study indicated a lack of networks among scientists and between scientists and policy-makers. Relations of scientists and policy-makers were perceived as challenging due to different interests and priorities, leading to difficulties in reaching political attention for One Health topics. It also highlighted a favoured attention to some One Health topics (e.g. antimicrobial resistance) as opposed to others (e.g. environmental issues). Important international actors to push One Health policies forward were the Quadripartite organisations and EU agencies. National actors (government agencies, national research institutes, universities) were on average perceived to be more important than international actors due to their roles and influences. Factors influencing the knowledge translation process were the different languages spoken by scientists as well as politicians, and an equivocal understanding of the One Health approach.

Conclusion: The study shows the importance of leadership to establish interdisciplinary networks and to problematise One Health issues with clear scope and targets. This will help to link knowledge to needs and capabilities of policy-makers. Establishing strong relationships among national and international actors can encourage networks and raise awareness of the One Health approach to policy-makers. Lastly, promoting research communication skills of scientists can provide a valuable tool to reach policy-makers to enhance attention to One Health topics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在欧洲不同的制度和政治背景下翻译“一个健康”知识。
背景:实施“同一个健康”方针是复杂的。它要求不同部门和行动者参与促进和保护人类、动物和环境健康。成功实施“同一个健康”方针的一个关键挑战是科学家和决策者之间的知识转化过程。方法:对来自23个欧洲国家的104名专家进行在线调查,他们分别就职于国家机构或研究所、大学、部委、非政府组织(世界卫生组织、世界动物卫生组织)和欧盟机构。进行了定性和定量分析,以描述专家的看法。结果:该研究表明科学家之间以及科学家与决策者之间缺乏网络。由于不同的利益和优先事项,科学家和决策者的关系被认为是具有挑战性的,导致“同一个健康”主题难以引起政治关注。它还强调,人们更倾向于关注某些“同一个健康”主题(例如抗菌素耐药性),而不是其他主题(例如环境问题)。推动“一个健康”政策向前发展的重要国际行为体是四方组织和欧盟机构。由于国家行为体的作用和影响,人们普遍认为国家行为体(政府机构、国家研究机构、大学)比国际行为体更重要。影响知识翻译过程的因素是科学家和政治家使用不同的语言,以及对“同一个健康”方法的模棱两可的理解。结论:该研究显示了领导力在建立跨学科网络和以明确的范围和目标解决“一个健康”问题方面的重要性。这将有助于将知识与决策者的需求和能力联系起来。在国家和国际行为体之间建立牢固的关系可以鼓励建立网络,并提高决策者对“同一个健康”方针的认识。最后,提高科学家的研究沟通技巧可以提供一个有价值的工具,以提高决策者对“同一个健康”主题的关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Global One Health post-graduate programmes: a review The impact of controlling diseases of significant global importance on greenhouse gas emissions from livestock production The One Health High-Level Expert Panel (OHHLEP) Drug resistance and extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBLs) - producing Enterobacteriaceae, Acinetobacter and Pseudomonas species from the views of one-health approach in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pillars for successful operationalization of one health as an ecosystem approach: experience from a human-animal interface in the Maasai steppe in Tanzania.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1