A comparison between dynamic and scalar timescales in lean premixed turbulent flames

Laurent Gagnepain, Christian Chauveau, Iskender Gökalp
{"title":"A comparison between dynamic and scalar timescales in lean premixed turbulent flames","authors":"Laurent Gagnepain,&nbsp;Christian Chauveau,&nbsp;Iskender Gökalp","doi":"10.1016/S0082-0784(98)80472-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A comparison between the dynamic and scalar timescales in turbulent premixed flames is presented. Methane-air turbulent Bunsen-type flames are used in this study. They are all lean flames and basically in the flamelet regime. Laser Doppler velocimetry (LDV), Mie scattering and Rayleigh scattering techniques allowed the determination of dynamic (both conditional and nonconditional) and scalar (density) timescales. For both dynamic and scalar temporal scales, we used the autocorrelation function of the LDV signal and the Rayleigh scattering signal, respectively. The main results of the paper indicate that there are significant differences between the conditional (in the reactants) dynamic timescales and those evaluated from nonconditional velocity measurements. The nonconditional velocity timescales are much closer to the scalar timescales, which indicates that they are strongly influenced by the flame front dynamics. Therefore, to evaluate the turbulent premixed flame regimes, only turbulence parameters based on conditional measurement are meaningful, as the nonconditional ones incorporate part of the flame response to the turbulence structure in the reactants. Comparisons between scalar and dynamic timescales, as well as between integral and dissipation timescales, are made. They can be useful in turbulent premixed combustion models for the mean reaction term. In general, the results presented here indicate a complex effect of the <em>u′/S<sub>L</sub></em>, ratio, which seems to depend on the way this parameter is varied.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101203,"journal":{"name":"Symposium (International) on Combustion","volume":"27 1","pages":"Pages 775-783"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0082-0784(98)80472-4","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Symposium (International) on Combustion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0082078498804724","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

A comparison between the dynamic and scalar timescales in turbulent premixed flames is presented. Methane-air turbulent Bunsen-type flames are used in this study. They are all lean flames and basically in the flamelet regime. Laser Doppler velocimetry (LDV), Mie scattering and Rayleigh scattering techniques allowed the determination of dynamic (both conditional and nonconditional) and scalar (density) timescales. For both dynamic and scalar temporal scales, we used the autocorrelation function of the LDV signal and the Rayleigh scattering signal, respectively. The main results of the paper indicate that there are significant differences between the conditional (in the reactants) dynamic timescales and those evaluated from nonconditional velocity measurements. The nonconditional velocity timescales are much closer to the scalar timescales, which indicates that they are strongly influenced by the flame front dynamics. Therefore, to evaluate the turbulent premixed flame regimes, only turbulence parameters based on conditional measurement are meaningful, as the nonconditional ones incorporate part of the flame response to the turbulence structure in the reactants. Comparisons between scalar and dynamic timescales, as well as between integral and dissipation timescales, are made. They can be useful in turbulent premixed combustion models for the mean reaction term. In general, the results presented here indicate a complex effect of the u′/SL, ratio, which seems to depend on the way this parameter is varied.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
稀预混湍流火焰中动态和标量时间尺度的比较
对湍流预混火焰的动态时间尺度和标量时间尺度进行了比较。本研究采用甲烷-空气湍流本生型火焰。它们都是稀薄的火焰,基本上都是小火焰。激光多普勒测速(LDV),米氏散射和瑞利散射技术允许确定动态(条件和非条件)和标量(密度)时间尺度。对于动态和标量时间尺度,我们分别使用LDV信号和瑞利散射信号的自相关函数。本文的主要结果表明,条件(在反应物中)动态时间尺度与非条件速度测量结果之间存在显著差异。非条件速度时标更接近于标量时标,这表明它们受火焰锋面动力学的强烈影响。因此,要评价湍流预混火焰状态,只有基于条件测量的湍流参数才有意义,因为非条件测量包含了反应物湍流结构的部分火焰响应。对标量时标与动态时标、积分时标与耗散时标进行了比较。它们可以用于紊流预混燃烧模型的平均反应项。一般来说,这里给出的结果表明u ' /SL比率的复杂影响,这似乎取决于该参数的变化方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Preface Introduction The effects of equivalence ratio on the formation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and soot in premixed methane flames C60, C60O, C70 and C70O fullerene formations in premixed benzene-oxygen flames
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1