Reducing Hemorrhage-Related Maternal Morbidity Using Interdisciplinary Simulation Training.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1097/SIH.0000000000000702
Jessica L Gerard, Mark A Turrentine, Susan Leong-Kee
{"title":"Reducing Hemorrhage-Related Maternal Morbidity Using Interdisciplinary Simulation Training.","authors":"Jessica L Gerard, Mark A Turrentine, Susan Leong-Kee","doi":"10.1097/SIH.0000000000000702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) remains a major cause of preventable maternal morbidity in the United States. Postpartum hemorrhage simulations were developed to improve provider recognition and treatment; however, there exist few studies that investigate their effects on individual outcomes. Our objective is to estimate the effect of a simulation-based educational intervention on PPH-related maternal morbidity outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of hemorrhage outcomes at a single institution between March 2012 and January 2016 during the implementation of a high-fidelity PPH simulation. Women with PPH defined as an estimated blood loss greater than 500 mL for vaginal delivery and 1000 mL for cesarean delivery were included. The primary outcome was a composite of hemorrhage-related maternal morbidity (maternal death, hysterectomy, intensive care unit admission, blood transfusion, or unanticipated procedures to treat postpartum bleeding). Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for confounding variables between presimulation and postsimulation outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 19,927 deliveries occurred with 4.5% of patients (888) experiencing hemorrhage. Women in the presimulation (n = 278) versus postsimulation groups (n = 610) had similar demographics. Although the PPH rate increased after simulation [2.8% pre vs. 6.1% post, odds ratio (OR), 2.25; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.95-2.60], composite hemorrhage-related morbidity was lower after simulation training (44% pre vs. 35% post; OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.52-0.93). This reduction persisted after adjusting for confounding variables of mode of delivery and time from delivery to first uterotonic use (adjusted OR, 0.66; 95%, CI 0.49-0.89).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite an increased PPH rate, simulation education was associated with a reduction in a hemorrhage-related maternal composite morbidity.</p>","PeriodicalId":49517,"journal":{"name":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","volume":" ","pages":"21-26"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000702","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) remains a major cause of preventable maternal morbidity in the United States. Postpartum hemorrhage simulations were developed to improve provider recognition and treatment; however, there exist few studies that investigate their effects on individual outcomes. Our objective is to estimate the effect of a simulation-based educational intervention on PPH-related maternal morbidity outcomes.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of hemorrhage outcomes at a single institution between March 2012 and January 2016 during the implementation of a high-fidelity PPH simulation. Women with PPH defined as an estimated blood loss greater than 500 mL for vaginal delivery and 1000 mL for cesarean delivery were included. The primary outcome was a composite of hemorrhage-related maternal morbidity (maternal death, hysterectomy, intensive care unit admission, blood transfusion, or unanticipated procedures to treat postpartum bleeding). Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for confounding variables between presimulation and postsimulation outcomes.

Results: During the study period, 19,927 deliveries occurred with 4.5% of patients (888) experiencing hemorrhage. Women in the presimulation (n = 278) versus postsimulation groups (n = 610) had similar demographics. Although the PPH rate increased after simulation [2.8% pre vs. 6.1% post, odds ratio (OR), 2.25; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.95-2.60], composite hemorrhage-related morbidity was lower after simulation training (44% pre vs. 35% post; OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.52-0.93). This reduction persisted after adjusting for confounding variables of mode of delivery and time from delivery to first uterotonic use (adjusted OR, 0.66; 95%, CI 0.49-0.89).

Conclusions: Despite an increased PPH rate, simulation education was associated with a reduction in a hemorrhage-related maternal composite morbidity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用跨学科模拟训练降低与出血相关的孕产妇发病率。
导言:在美国,产后出血(PPH)仍然是可预防的孕产妇发病率的主要原因。模拟产后出血是为了提高医疗人员的识别能力和治疗水平而开发的;然而,很少有研究调查模拟产后出血对个体结果的影响。我们的目的是评估模拟教育干预对 PPH 相关孕产妇发病率结果的影响:我们对一家医疗机构在 2012 年 3 月至 2016 年 1 月实施高保真 PPH 模拟期间的出血结果进行了回顾性队列分析。纳入的 PPH 患者中,阴道分娩的失血量估计超过 500 毫升,剖宫产的失血量估计超过 1000 毫升。主要结果是与出血相关的孕产妇发病率(孕产妇死亡、子宫切除、入住重症监护室、输血或治疗产后出血的意外手术)的复合结果。多变量逻辑回归调整了模拟前和模拟后结果之间的混杂变量:在研究期间,共有 19,927 例分娩,4.5% 的患者(888 例)出现大出血。模拟前组(n = 278)和模拟后组(n = 610)的产妇具有相似的人口统计学特征。虽然模拟训练后 PPH 发生率增加了[模拟前 2.8% 对模拟后 6.1%,比值比 (OR) 2.25;95% 置信区间 (CI),1.95-2.60],但模拟训练后出血相关的综合发病率降低了(模拟前 44% 对模拟后 35%;OR,0.70;95% CI,0.52-0.93)。在对分娩方式和从分娩到首次使用宫缩剂的时间等混杂变量进行调整后,这种下降趋势依然存在(调整后的OR值为0.66;95% CI为0.49-0.89):结论:尽管 PPH 发生率增加,但模拟教育可降低与出血相关的孕产妇综合发病率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare is a multidisciplinary publication encompassing all areas of applications and research in healthcare simulation technology. The journal is relevant to a broad range of clinical and biomedical specialties, and publishes original basic, clinical, and translational research on these topics and more: Safety and quality-oriented training programs; Development of educational and competency assessment standards; Reports of experience in the use of simulation technology; Virtual reality; Epidemiologic modeling; Molecular, pharmacologic, and disease modeling.
期刊最新文献
Virtual Monitoring Technician Performance in High-Fidelity Simulations of Remote Patient Monitoring: An Exploratory Study. Bridging Two Worlds: A Basic Scientist's Transformative Path in Healthcare Simulation. Measuring Residents' Competence in Chest Tube Insertion on Thiel-Embalmed Bodies: A Validity Study. Call to Action: Honoring Simulated Participants and Collaborating With Simulated Participant Educators. When Simulation Becomes Reality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1