Ultrasonographic measurement of the optic nerve sheath diameter to detect intracranial hypertension: an observational study.

IF 3.4 Q2 Medicine Ultrasound Journal Pub Date : 2023-02-02 DOI:10.1186/s13089-022-00304-3
Christian Daniel Yic, Julio Pontet, Mauricio Mercado, Matias Muñoz, Alberto Biestro
{"title":"Ultrasonographic measurement of the optic nerve sheath diameter to detect intracranial hypertension: an observational study.","authors":"Christian Daniel Yic, Julio Pontet, Mauricio Mercado, Matias Muñoz, Alberto Biestro","doi":"10.1186/s13089-022-00304-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the ultrasonographic measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) as a predictor of intracranial hypertension as compared to the invasive measurement of intracranial pressure (ICP).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of two tertiary university hospitals in Montevideo, Uruguay.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>We included 56 adult patients, over 18 years of age, who required sedation, mechanical ventilation, and invasive ICP monitoring as a result of a severe acute neurologic injury (traumatic or non-traumatic) and had a Glascow Coma Score (GCS) equal to or less than 8 on admission to the ICU.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Ultrasonographic measurement of ONSD to detect intracranial hypertension.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>In our study, a logistic regression model was performed in which it was observed that the variable ONSD is statistically significant with a p value of 0.00803 (< 0.05). This model estimates and predicts the probability that a patient will have an ICP greater than 20 mmHg. From the analysis of the cut-off points, it is observed that a value of 5.7 mm of ONSD maximizes the sensitivity (92.9%) of the method (a greater number of individuals with ICP > 20 mmHg are correctly identified).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In sedated neurocritical patients, with structural Acute Brain Injury, the ONSD measurement correlates with the invasive measurement of ICP. It was observed that with ONSD values less than 5.7 mm, the probability of being in the presence of ICP above 20 mmHg is very low, while for ONSD values greater than 5.7 mm, said probability clearly increases.</p>","PeriodicalId":36911,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9895168/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-022-00304-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the ultrasonographic measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) as a predictor of intracranial hypertension as compared to the invasive measurement of intracranial pressure (ICP).

Design: Cross-sectional observational study.

Setting: Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of two tertiary university hospitals in Montevideo, Uruguay.

Patients: We included 56 adult patients, over 18 years of age, who required sedation, mechanical ventilation, and invasive ICP monitoring as a result of a severe acute neurologic injury (traumatic or non-traumatic) and had a Glascow Coma Score (GCS) equal to or less than 8 on admission to the ICU.

Interventions: Ultrasonographic measurement of ONSD to detect intracranial hypertension.

Measurements and main results: In our study, a logistic regression model was performed in which it was observed that the variable ONSD is statistically significant with a p value of 0.00803 (< 0.05). This model estimates and predicts the probability that a patient will have an ICP greater than 20 mmHg. From the analysis of the cut-off points, it is observed that a value of 5.7 mm of ONSD maximizes the sensitivity (92.9%) of the method (a greater number of individuals with ICP > 20 mmHg are correctly identified).

Conclusions: In sedated neurocritical patients, with structural Acute Brain Injury, the ONSD measurement correlates with the invasive measurement of ICP. It was observed that with ONSD values less than 5.7 mm, the probability of being in the presence of ICP above 20 mmHg is very low, while for ONSD values greater than 5.7 mm, said probability clearly increases.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声测量视神经鞘直径检测颅内高压:一项观察性研究。
目的:评价超声测量视神经鞘直径(ONSD)与有创测量颅内压(ICP)相比作为颅内高压的预测指标。设计:横断面观察性研究。环境:乌拉圭蒙得维的亚两所三级大学医院的重症监护室。患者:我们纳入56例18岁以上的成人患者,由于严重急性神经损伤(外伤性或非外伤性)需要镇静、机械通气和侵入性ICP监测,并且在进入ICU时格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)等于或小于8。干预措施:超声测量ONSD检测颅内高压。测量结果和主要结果:在我们的研究中,进行了逻辑回归模型,观察到变量ONSD具有统计学意义,p值为0.00803(正确识别20 mmHg)。结论:在镇静的神经危重症伴结构性急性脑损伤患者中,ONSD测量与有创性颅内压测量相关。观察到,当ONSD值小于5.7 mm时,ICP高于20 mmHg的可能性非常低,而当ONSD值大于5.7 mm时,这种可能性明显增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ultrasound Journal
Ultrasound Journal Health Professions-Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
45
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Sonographic findings using the SAFE-A protocol in pre- and post-hemodialysis patients. Utilizing a balloon sheath and miniprobe for diagnostic endoscopic ultrasound in eosinophilic esophagitis: a case series. Transorbital B-mode ultrasound for the assessment of posterior globe flattening in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a pilot study. Interobserver agreement of an ED PoCUS video training dataset of normal appendix and appendicitis in children. Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) diagnostics: gleaning insights from point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) techniques in emergencies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1