Competencies of junior medical doctors in managing seriously ill and injured children: time to rethink our current training approach?

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS Journal of Tropical Pediatrics Pub Date : 2023-08-24 DOI:10.1093/tropej/fmad025
Louisa Erasmus, Andrew Redfern, Liezl Smit
{"title":"Competencies of junior medical doctors in managing seriously ill and injured children: time to rethink our current training approach?","authors":"Louisa Erasmus,&nbsp;Andrew Redfern,&nbsp;Liezl Smit","doi":"10.1093/tropej/fmad025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The correct treatment of very ill and injured children is critical, yet little is known about the competencies of South African (SA) junior doctors in managing these children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This survey documents SA junior doctors' reported resuscitation training opportunities, experience, skills and knowledge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 118 doctors (interns, medical officers and registrars) from paediatric departments affiliated with 7 medical schools, participated. Resuscitations were not rare events with 71% (84/118) reporting participation in >10 resuscitations during the preceding 2 years. Yet a third of doctors have not attended an accredited resuscitation training course within the last 2 years; 34% (12/35) medical officers and 29% (18/63) registrars, respectively, with 42% (49/118) of all participants never receiving any formal resuscitation training during employment. Feedback on performance is not standard practice with only 8% (10/118) reporting consistent debriefing after a resuscitation. Although 72% (85/118) reported their resuscitation knowledge as adequate, 56% (66/118) passed the knowledge test.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study recognized missed learning opportunities in junior doctors' training, assessment, debriefing and knowledge which may adversely affect the quality of care in managing paediatric emergencies. This has implications for departmental and post-graduate training programmes.</p>","PeriodicalId":17521,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Tropical Pediatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Tropical Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tropej/fmad025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The correct treatment of very ill and injured children is critical, yet little is known about the competencies of South African (SA) junior doctors in managing these children.

Methods: This survey documents SA junior doctors' reported resuscitation training opportunities, experience, skills and knowledge.

Results: A total of 118 doctors (interns, medical officers and registrars) from paediatric departments affiliated with 7 medical schools, participated. Resuscitations were not rare events with 71% (84/118) reporting participation in >10 resuscitations during the preceding 2 years. Yet a third of doctors have not attended an accredited resuscitation training course within the last 2 years; 34% (12/35) medical officers and 29% (18/63) registrars, respectively, with 42% (49/118) of all participants never receiving any formal resuscitation training during employment. Feedback on performance is not standard practice with only 8% (10/118) reporting consistent debriefing after a resuscitation. Although 72% (85/118) reported their resuscitation knowledge as adequate, 56% (66/118) passed the knowledge test.

Conclusion: This study recognized missed learning opportunities in junior doctors' training, assessment, debriefing and knowledge which may adversely affect the quality of care in managing paediatric emergencies. This has implications for departmental and post-graduate training programmes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
初级医生管理重病和受伤儿童的能力:是时候重新思考我们目前的培训方法了?
背景:对重病和受伤儿童的正确治疗是至关重要的,然而人们对南非(SA)初级医生在管理这些儿童方面的能力知之甚少。方法:对SA初级医生报告的复苏培训机会、经验、技能和知识进行调查。结果:来自7所医学院附属儿科的118名医生(实习生、医师和登记员)参与了调查。复苏并非罕见事件,71%(84/118)报告在过去2年内参与了>10次复苏。然而,三分之一的医生在过去两年内没有参加过认可的复苏培训课程;医务人员占34%(12/35),登记员占29%(18/63),所有参与者中42%(49/118)在就业期间从未接受过任何正式的复苏培训。对表现的反馈不是标准做法,只有8%(10/118)报告在复苏后进行了持续的汇报。尽管72%(85/118)的患者认为他们的复苏知识足够,但56%(66/118)的患者通过了知识测试。结论:本研究认识到初级医生在培训、评估、汇报和知识方面的学习机会缺失,这可能会对儿科急诊管理的护理质量产生不利影响。这对院系和研究生培训课程都有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Tropical Pediatrics
Journal of Tropical Pediatrics 医学-热带医学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Tropical Pediatrics provides a link between theory and practice in the field. Papers report key results of clinical and community research, and considerations of programme development. More general descriptive pieces are included when they have application to work preceeding elsewhere. The journal also presents review articles, book reviews and, occasionally, short monographs and selections of important papers delivered at relevant conferences.
期刊最新文献
Cerebrospinal fluid tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) levels in children with cerebral malaria. COVID-19 lockdown effect on healthcare utilization and in-hospital mortality in children under 5 years in Cape Town, South Africa: a cross-sectional study. Pediatric sepsis profile in a tertiary-care hospital in Indonesia: a 4-year retrospective study. Evaluation and monitoring of eye findings in children exposed to Zika virus during gestation: 3 years of follow-up. Global perspective from high-income countries on phototherapy threshold differences at 24 h in 36- and 38-week newborn infants.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1