Bullying-Related Tweets: a Qualitative Examination of Perpetrators, Targets, and Helpers.

Karla Dhungana Sainju, Akosua Kuffour, Lisa Young, Niti Mishra
{"title":"Bullying-Related Tweets: a Qualitative Examination of Perpetrators, Targets, and Helpers.","authors":"Karla Dhungana Sainju,&nbsp;Akosua Kuffour,&nbsp;Lisa Young,&nbsp;Niti Mishra","doi":"10.1007/s42380-021-00098-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bullying literature notes that aside from the dyadic relationship of target and perpetrator, there are other participant roles in the bullying process including those that reinforce the perpetrator and those that stand up for the target. Most examinations of bullying roles have relied on self-reported data, which suffer from key limitations such as response and recall bias. Twitter data provides a way to overcome these limitations and extend our current understanding of bullying roles. The current study provides one of the first qualitative examinations of tweets to analyze the disclosure and sharing of bullying-related online and offline episodes. Through a qualitative content analysis, the study examines 780 tweets to analyze the descriptions and characteristics of three participant roles: the perpetrator, target, and helper. The results provide multidimensional insights into the context and relationships between bullying roles. The results reveal that each of the bullying role players tweet to share varying perspectives and the discussions transcend beyond just online exchanges. The results also confirm that Twitter is used not only as a channel for bullying but also as a tool for connection between the different role players. Implications of how Twitter can be leveraged to promote anti-bullying initiatives to educate and inform users about bullying, while also helping build resilience and emotional regulation, are discussed. Additionally, the study also has implications for artificial intelligence and can help to build improved classifiers to detect bullying-related discourse and content online.</p>","PeriodicalId":73427,"journal":{"name":"International journal of bullying prevention : an official publication of the International Bullying Prevention Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s42380-021-00098-3","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of bullying prevention : an official publication of the International Bullying Prevention Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-021-00098-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Bullying literature notes that aside from the dyadic relationship of target and perpetrator, there are other participant roles in the bullying process including those that reinforce the perpetrator and those that stand up for the target. Most examinations of bullying roles have relied on self-reported data, which suffer from key limitations such as response and recall bias. Twitter data provides a way to overcome these limitations and extend our current understanding of bullying roles. The current study provides one of the first qualitative examinations of tweets to analyze the disclosure and sharing of bullying-related online and offline episodes. Through a qualitative content analysis, the study examines 780 tweets to analyze the descriptions and characteristics of three participant roles: the perpetrator, target, and helper. The results provide multidimensional insights into the context and relationships between bullying roles. The results reveal that each of the bullying role players tweet to share varying perspectives and the discussions transcend beyond just online exchanges. The results also confirm that Twitter is used not only as a channel for bullying but also as a tool for connection between the different role players. Implications of how Twitter can be leveraged to promote anti-bullying initiatives to educate and inform users about bullying, while also helping build resilience and emotional regulation, are discussed. Additionally, the study also has implications for artificial intelligence and can help to build improved classifiers to detect bullying-related discourse and content online.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与霸凌相关的推文:对施暴者、目标和帮助者的定性检验。
霸凌文献指出,除了目标和施暴者的二元关系外,霸凌过程中还有其他参与者角色,包括那些强化施暴者的角色和那些为目标挺身而出的角色。大多数对欺凌角色的检查都依赖于自我报告的数据,这些数据受到反应和回忆偏见等关键限制。Twitter数据提供了一种克服这些限制的方法,并扩展了我们目前对欺凌角色的理解。目前的研究首次对推文进行定性分析,以分析与欺凌相关的在线和离线事件的披露和分享。通过定性内容分析,本研究考察了780条推文,分析了三种参与者角色的描述和特征:加害者、目标和帮助者。研究结果为欺凌角色之间的背景和关系提供了多维的见解。结果显示,每个欺凌角色参与者都在推特上分享不同的观点,讨论超越了在线交流。研究结果还证实,Twitter不仅被用作欺凌的渠道,而且还被用作不同角色参与者之间联系的工具。讨论了如何利用Twitter来促进反欺凌举措,以教育和告知用户欺凌行为,同时帮助建立复原力和情绪调节的影响。此外,该研究还对人工智能有影响,可以帮助建立改进的分类器,以检测在线欺凌相关的话语和内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Psychosocial Well-being, Problematic Social Media Use, and Cyberbullying Involvement Among Mongolian Adolescents Systematic Review of Intervention and Prevention Programs to Tackle Homophobic Bullying at School: a Socio-emotional Learning Skills Perspective Teacher Identity and Bullying—Perspectives from Teachers During Bullying Prevention Professional Development Can Job Demands and Job Resources Predict Bystander Behaviour in Workplace Bullying? A Longitudinal Study Revisiting the Definition of Bullying in the Context of Higher Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1