Cephalometric Variability Among Siblings: A Pilot Study.

IF 0.8 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Turkish Journal of Orthodontics Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2022.21237
Katharine L Marcks, Yihong Zhao, Melih Motro, Leslie A Will
{"title":"Cephalometric Variability Among Siblings: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Katharine L Marcks,&nbsp;Yihong Zhao,&nbsp;Melih Motro,&nbsp;Leslie A Will","doi":"10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2022.21237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether multiple siblings resemble one another in their craniofacial characteristics as measured on cephalometric radiographs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted retrospectively using the Forsyth Moorrees twin sample. A total of 32 families were included, each with ≥4 postpubertal siblings, totaling 142 subjects. Only 1 monozygotic twin was included per family. Headfilms were digitized, skeletal landmarks were located, and 6 parameters that indicated sagittal jaw relationships and vertical status were measured. Diverse statistical approaches were used. Dixon's Q-test detected outliers in a family for a given parameter. Manhattan Distance quantified similarity among siblings per parameter. Scatter plots visually displayed subject's measure relative to the mean and standard deviation of each parameter to assess the clinical relevance of the differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 11 families (34.4%) had no outliers on any parameter, 13 families (40.6%) had outliers on 1 parameter, and 8 families (25%) had outliers on ≥2 parameters. We identified 29 individuals with at least 1 outlying measure (20.4%). Among these, only 2 individuals (1.4%) were significantly different from their siblings for more than 1 measurement. Although the majority of the families did not demonstrate any statistical outlier, the ranges of the measurements were clinically relevant as they might suggest different treatment. For example, the mean range of SNB (Sella-Nasion-B point) angles was 7.23°, and the mean range of MPA was 9.42°.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although families are generally not dissimilar in their craniofacial characteristics, measurements from siblings cannot be used to predict the measurements of another sibling in a clinically meaningful way.</p>","PeriodicalId":37013,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Orthodontics","volume":"35 4","pages":"239-247"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9885832/pdf/tjo-35-4-239.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2022.21237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether multiple siblings resemble one another in their craniofacial characteristics as measured on cephalometric radiographs.

Methods: This study was conducted retrospectively using the Forsyth Moorrees twin sample. A total of 32 families were included, each with ≥4 postpubertal siblings, totaling 142 subjects. Only 1 monozygotic twin was included per family. Headfilms were digitized, skeletal landmarks were located, and 6 parameters that indicated sagittal jaw relationships and vertical status were measured. Diverse statistical approaches were used. Dixon's Q-test detected outliers in a family for a given parameter. Manhattan Distance quantified similarity among siblings per parameter. Scatter plots visually displayed subject's measure relative to the mean and standard deviation of each parameter to assess the clinical relevance of the differences.

Results: A total of 11 families (34.4%) had no outliers on any parameter, 13 families (40.6%) had outliers on 1 parameter, and 8 families (25%) had outliers on ≥2 parameters. We identified 29 individuals with at least 1 outlying measure (20.4%). Among these, only 2 individuals (1.4%) were significantly different from their siblings for more than 1 measurement. Although the majority of the families did not demonstrate any statistical outlier, the ranges of the measurements were clinically relevant as they might suggest different treatment. For example, the mean range of SNB (Sella-Nasion-B point) angles was 7.23°, and the mean range of MPA was 9.42°.

Conclusion: Although families are generally not dissimilar in their craniofacial characteristics, measurements from siblings cannot be used to predict the measurements of another sibling in a clinically meaningful way.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
兄弟姐妹的头颅测量变异性:一项初步研究。
目的:通过头颅x线片测量,确定多个兄弟姐妹在颅面特征上是否相似。方法:本研究采用Forsyth Moorrees双胞胎样本进行回顾性研究。共纳入32个家庭,每个家庭有≥4名青春期后的兄弟姐妹,共142名受试者。每个家庭只有1个同卵双胞胎。头部影像被数字化,骨骼标志被定位,6个参数显示矢状颌关系和垂直状态被测量。采用了不同的统计方法。Dixon的Q-test检测给定参数的家族中的异常值。曼哈顿距离通过参数量化兄弟姐妹之间的相似性。散点图直观地显示受试者相对于每个参数的平均值和标准差的测量值,以评估差异的临床相关性。结果:11个家庭(34.4%)在任何参数上均无异常值,13个家庭(40.6%)在1个参数上有异常值,8个家庭(25%)在≥2个参数上有异常值。我们发现29个人至少有1项离群测量(20.4%)。其中,只有2人(1.4%)在1次以上测量中与其兄弟姐妹存在显著差异。虽然大多数家庭没有表现出任何统计异常值,但测量的范围具有临床相关性,因为它们可能建议不同的治疗方法。例如,SNB (Sella-Nasion-B点)角度的平均范围为7.23°,MPA的平均范围为9.42°。结论:虽然家族在颅面特征上通常没有差异,但兄弟姐妹的测量结果不能用于预测另一个兄弟姐妹的测量结果,这在临床上是有意义的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Orthodontics
Turkish Journal of Orthodontics Dentistry-Orthodontics
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Accuracy of 3D Printer Technologies Using Digital Dental Models. Comparing the Impact of Titanium and Stainless Steel Retainers on Lower Incisor Stability, Periodontal Health, and Retainer Survival: A Preliminary Study. Comparison of the Effects of Fixed and Removable Functional Orthodontic Treatment on the Mandibular Trabecular Bone in Fractal Analysis. Effects of Emotional States on Reproducibilities of Rest Position, Social and Spontaneous Smiles, and Speech. Erratum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1