Toward a Unified Theory of the Reference Frame of the Ventriloquism Aftereffect.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Trends in Hearing Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23312165231201020
Peter Lokša, Norbert Kopčo
{"title":"Toward a Unified Theory of the Reference Frame of the Ventriloquism Aftereffect.","authors":"Peter Lokša, Norbert Kopčo","doi":"10.1177/23312165231201020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The ventriloquism aftereffect (VAE), observed as a shift in the perceived locations of sounds after audio-visual stimulation, requires reference frame (RF) alignment since hearing and vision encode space in different RFs (head-centered vs. eye-centered). Previous experimental studies reported inconsistent results, observing either a mixture of head-centered and eye-centered frames, or a predominantly head-centered frame. Here, a computational model is introduced, examining the neural mechanisms underlying these effects. The basic model version assumes that the auditory spatial map is head-centered and the visual signals are converted to head-centered frame prior to inducing the adaptation. Two mechanisms are considered as extended model versions to describe the mixed-frame experimental data: (1) additional presence of visual signals in eye-centered frame and (2) eye-gaze direction-dependent attenuation in VAE when eyes shift away from the training fixation. Simulation results show that the mixed-frame results are mainly due to the second mechanism, suggesting that the RF of VAE is mainly head-centered. Additionally, a mechanism is proposed to explain a new ventriloquism-aftereffect-like phenomenon in which adaptation is induced by aligned audio-visual signals when saccades are used for responding to auditory targets. A version of the model extended to consider such response-method-related biases accurately predicts the new phenomenon. When attempting to model all the experimentally observed phenomena simultaneously, the model predictions are qualitatively similar but less accurate, suggesting that the proposed neural mechanisms interact in a more complex way than assumed in the model.</p>","PeriodicalId":48678,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Hearing","volume":"27 ","pages":"23312165231201020"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ff/13/10.1177_23312165231201020.PMC10505348.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Hearing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23312165231201020","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ventriloquism aftereffect (VAE), observed as a shift in the perceived locations of sounds after audio-visual stimulation, requires reference frame (RF) alignment since hearing and vision encode space in different RFs (head-centered vs. eye-centered). Previous experimental studies reported inconsistent results, observing either a mixture of head-centered and eye-centered frames, or a predominantly head-centered frame. Here, a computational model is introduced, examining the neural mechanisms underlying these effects. The basic model version assumes that the auditory spatial map is head-centered and the visual signals are converted to head-centered frame prior to inducing the adaptation. Two mechanisms are considered as extended model versions to describe the mixed-frame experimental data: (1) additional presence of visual signals in eye-centered frame and (2) eye-gaze direction-dependent attenuation in VAE when eyes shift away from the training fixation. Simulation results show that the mixed-frame results are mainly due to the second mechanism, suggesting that the RF of VAE is mainly head-centered. Additionally, a mechanism is proposed to explain a new ventriloquism-aftereffect-like phenomenon in which adaptation is induced by aligned audio-visual signals when saccades are used for responding to auditory targets. A version of the model extended to consider such response-method-related biases accurately predicts the new phenomenon. When attempting to model all the experimentally observed phenomena simultaneously, the model predictions are qualitatively similar but less accurate, suggesting that the proposed neural mechanisms interact in a more complex way than assumed in the model.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
走向腹语术后遗症参照系的统一理论。
腹语后遗症(VAE)是视听刺激后声音感知位置的变化,需要参考系(RF)对齐,因为听觉和视觉在不同的RF中编码空间(以头部为中心与以眼睛为中心)。先前的实验研究报告了不一致的结果,观察到的是以头部为中心和以眼睛为中心的框架的混合,或者是以头部为主的框架。在这里,引入了一个计算模型,研究了这些效应背后的神经机制。基本模型版本假设听觉空间图是以头部为中心的,并且在诱导自适应之前将视觉信号转换为以头部为核心的帧。两种机制被认为是描述混合帧实验数据的扩展模型版本:(1)以眼睛为中心的帧中视觉信号的额外存在;(2)当眼睛偏离训练注视时,VAE中的眼睛凝视方向依赖性衰减。仿真结果表明,混合帧结果主要是由于第二种机制,表明VAE的RF主要是以头部为中心的。此外,还提出了一种机制来解释一种新的类似腹语后效的现象,在这种现象中,当扫视用于响应听觉目标时,对齐的视听信号会诱导适应。该模型的一个版本扩展到考虑了这种反应方法相关的偏差,准确地预测了新现象。当试图同时对所有实验观察到的现象进行建模时,模型预测在质量上相似,但不太准确,这表明所提出的神经机制以比模型中假设的更复杂的方式相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Trends in Hearing
Trends in Hearing AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGYOTORH-OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
44
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Trends in Hearing is an open access journal completely dedicated to publishing original research and reviews focusing on human hearing, hearing loss, hearing aids, auditory implants, and aural rehabilitation. Under its former name, Trends in Amplification, the journal established itself as a forum for concise explorations of all areas of translational hearing research by leaders in the field. Trends in Hearing has now expanded its focus to include original research articles, with the goal of becoming the premier venue for research related to human hearing and hearing loss.
期刊最新文献
Adaptation to Noise in Spectrotemporal Modulation Detection and Word Recognition On the Feasibility of Using Behavioral Listening Effort Test Methods to Evaluate Auditory Performance in Cochlear Implant Users Focusing on Positive Listening Experiences Improves Speech Intelligibility in Experienced Hearing Aid Users (Why) Do Transparent Hearing Devices Impair Speech Perception in Collocated Noise? Remixing Preferences for Western Instrumental Classical Music of Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1