Comparison of Two Reciprocating and Anatomical Single File Techniques in Cleaning Oval Anatomies.

Q3 Dentistry Iranian Endodontic Journal Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.22037/iej.v18i1.33623
Andreas Krokidis, Barabanti Nicola, Cerutti Antonio, Panos Panopoulos
{"title":"Comparison of Two Reciprocating and Anatomical Single File Techniques in Cleaning Oval Anatomies.","authors":"Andreas Krokidis,&nbsp;Barabanti Nicola,&nbsp;Cerutti Antonio,&nbsp;Panos Panopoulos","doi":"10.22037/iej.v18i1.33623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The present study aimed to compare the capability of two single-file shaping systems in disinfecting and cleaning long oval root canals.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifty single-rooted teeth were prepared, contaminated with <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> and divided into two groups. Two samplings were obtained; S1 before chemo-mechanical preparation and S2 after the preparation. Depending on the group, chemo-mechanical preparation was performed with XP-endo Shaper (XPS) and Wave One Gold (WOG). Five teeth from each group were observed under scanning electron microscopy (1000×) to evaluate the cleanliness of root canals at 3, 6 and 9 mm from the apex. All probability (<i>P</i>-values) were two-tailed, statistical significance was set at 0.05 and analyses were conducted using SPSS statistical software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant reduction in the colony forming units was observed from S1 to S2 in both tested groups. In S2, XPS group obtained significantly lower colony forming units (<i>P</i><0.001). In the cleanliness study, XPS group resulted in significantly cleaner canals compared to WOG.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on this <i>in vitro</i> study XPS system was more effective in disinfecting and cleaning long oval canals.</p>","PeriodicalId":14534,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Endodontic Journal","volume":"18 1","pages":"41-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/17/d9/IEJ-18-41.PMC9900148.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/iej.v18i1.33623","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The present study aimed to compare the capability of two single-file shaping systems in disinfecting and cleaning long oval root canals.

Materials and methods: Fifty single-rooted teeth were prepared, contaminated with Enterococcus faecalis and divided into two groups. Two samplings were obtained; S1 before chemo-mechanical preparation and S2 after the preparation. Depending on the group, chemo-mechanical preparation was performed with XP-endo Shaper (XPS) and Wave One Gold (WOG). Five teeth from each group were observed under scanning electron microscopy (1000×) to evaluate the cleanliness of root canals at 3, 6 and 9 mm from the apex. All probability (P-values) were two-tailed, statistical significance was set at 0.05 and analyses were conducted using SPSS statistical software.

Results: A significant reduction in the colony forming units was observed from S1 to S2 in both tested groups. In S2, XPS group obtained significantly lower colony forming units (P<0.001). In the cleanliness study, XPS group resulted in significantly cleaner canals compared to WOG.

Conclusions: Based on this in vitro study XPS system was more effective in disinfecting and cleaning long oval canals.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种往复式和解剖式单锉清洗椭圆解剖的比较。
简介:本研究旨在比较两种单锉整形系统在消毒和清洁长椭圆形根管方面的能力。材料与方法:制备粪肠球菌污染的单根牙50颗,分为两组。获得两次采样;化学机械制备前为S1,制备后为S2。根据组的不同,使用XP-endo Shaper (XPS)和Wave One Gold (WOG)进行化学机械制备。每组5颗牙在1000倍扫描电镜下观察距离根尖3、6、9 mm的根管清洁度。所有概率(p值)均为双尾,统计学显著性设为0.05,采用SPSS统计软件进行分析。结果:在两个测试组中,观察到从S1到S2的集落形成单位显著减少。在S2时,XPS组的菌落形成单位明显低于对照组(p)。结论:在体外实验的基础上,XPS系统对长卵形管的消毒和清洁更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Iranian Endodontic Journal
Iranian Endodontic Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Iranian Endodontic Journal (IEJ) is an international peer-reviewed biomedical publication, the aim of which is to provide a scientific medium of communication for researchers throughout the globe. IEJ aims to publish the highest quality articles, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of Endodontics. The journal is an official Journal of the Iranian Center for Endodontic Research (ICER) and the Iranian Association of Endodontists (IAE). The Journal welcomes articles related to the scientific or applied aspects of endodontics e.g. original researches, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, review articles, clinical trials, case series/reports, hypotheses, letters to the editor, etc. From the beginning (i.e. since 2006), the IEJ was the first open access endodontic journal in the world, which gave readers free and instant access to published articles and enabling them faster discovery of the latest endodontic research.
期刊最新文献
Sodium Hypochlorite-induced Facial Hematoma Following Root Canal Treatment. Successful Management of a Typical Class 3 Invasive Cervical Root Resorption with Modified Pulpotomy: A Case Report. Assessing the Impact of Mandibular Molar Root Length on Success in Supplemental Intraligamentary Injection for Irreversible Pulpitis. Comparative Analysis of Photosensitizer Penetration Depth in Root Canal Debridement for Endodontic Disinfection. Comparative Outcomes of Pulpotomy in Mature Molars with Irreversible Pulpitis: A Non-Randomized Trial Evaluating Calcified and Non-Calcified Pulp Chambers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1