Effect of postoperative radiotherapy on survival in patients with completely resected and pathologically confirmed stage N2 non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20406223231195622
Lin Wang, Wenyu Chen, Xiaofei Xu, Wenbo Chen, Derong Bao, Ye Zhang, Yufen Xu
{"title":"Effect of postoperative radiotherapy on survival in patients with completely resected and pathologically confirmed stage N2 non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Lin Wang,&nbsp;Wenyu Chen,&nbsp;Xiaofei Xu,&nbsp;Wenbo Chen,&nbsp;Derong Bao,&nbsp;Ye Zhang,&nbsp;Yufen Xu","doi":"10.1177/20406223231195622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for patients with completely resected stage N2 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been controversial. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of PORT and prognosis in these patients.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>An updated meta-analysis was conducted in this study to investigate the efficacy of PORT and prognosis in patients with completely resected and pathologically confirmed stage N2 NSCLC.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Data source and methods: </strong>Databases were searched up to 2 March 2022. All trials on patients with completely resected and pathologically confirmed stage N2 NSCLC undergoing PORT were screened, and data indicators in the PORT and non-PORT groups were extracted, respectively. The effect of PORT on overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) was estimated. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all, 20 studies involving 6340 patients were finally included. The PORT significantly increased OS [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.71-0.84, <i>p</i> < 0.001), LRFS (HR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.52-0.76, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and DFS (HR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.63-0.82, <i>p</i> < 0.001) while it showed no significant difference in improving DMFS (HR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.71-1.05, <i>p</i> = 0.14).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest that in the postoperative treatment of patients with completely resected and pathologically confirmed stage N2 NSCLC, the addition of PORT provides better local recurrence control and survival benefit, but no benefit for distant metastases. The PORT may be incorporated into the postoperative treatment options for some patients with high-risk factors. However, it needs to be validated by more prospective studies in the future.</p><p><strong>Trail registration: </strong>CRD42022314095.</p>","PeriodicalId":22960,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease","volume":"14 ","pages":"20406223231195622"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a3/e3/10.1177_20406223231195622.PMC10501070.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20406223231195622","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for patients with completely resected stage N2 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been controversial. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of PORT and prognosis in these patients.

Objectives: An updated meta-analysis was conducted in this study to investigate the efficacy of PORT and prognosis in patients with completely resected and pathologically confirmed stage N2 NSCLC.

Design: This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data source and methods: Databases were searched up to 2 March 2022. All trials on patients with completely resected and pathologically confirmed stage N2 NSCLC undergoing PORT were screened, and data indicators in the PORT and non-PORT groups were extracted, respectively. The effect of PORT on overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) was estimated. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed.

Results: In all, 20 studies involving 6340 patients were finally included. The PORT significantly increased OS [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.71-0.84, p < 0.001), LRFS (HR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.52-0.76, p < 0.001), and DFS (HR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.63-0.82, p < 0.001) while it showed no significant difference in improving DMFS (HR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.71-1.05, p = 0.14).

Conclusion: Our results suggest that in the postoperative treatment of patients with completely resected and pathologically confirmed stage N2 NSCLC, the addition of PORT provides better local recurrence control and survival benefit, but no benefit for distant metastases. The PORT may be incorporated into the postoperative treatment options for some patients with high-risk factors. However, it needs to be validated by more prospective studies in the future.

Trail registration: CRD42022314095.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
术后放疗对完全切除病理证实的N2期非小细胞肺癌患者生存的影响:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
背景:术后放疗(PORT)在完全切除的N2期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中的作用一直存在争议。本研究旨在探讨PORT治疗这些患者的疗效及预后。目的:本研究进行了一项更新的荟萃分析,探讨PORT在完全切除并病理证实的N2期NSCLC患者中的疗效和预后。设计:本研究采用系统综述和荟萃分析。数据来源和方法:检索截止到2022年3月2日的数据库。筛选所有接受PORT手术的完全切除且病理证实的N2期NSCLC患者的试验,分别提取PORT组和非PORT组的数据指标。估计PORT对总生存期(OS)、无病生存期(DFS)、局部无复发生存期(LRFS)和远端无转移生存期(DMFS)的影响。进行亚组分析和敏感性分析。结果:最终共纳入20项研究,涉及6340例患者。PORT显著增加OS[风险比(HR) = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.71-0.84, p p p p = 0.14]。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在完全切除并病理证实的N2期NSCLC患者的术后治疗中,PORT的加入可以更好地控制局部复发和生存,但对远处转移没有好处。对于一些有高危因素的患者,PORT可纳入术后治疗方案。然而,这需要在未来进行更多的前瞻性研究来验证。试验注册:CRD42022314095。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease
Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
108
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease publishes the highest quality peer-reviewed research, reviews and scholarly comment in the drug treatment of all chronic diseases. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers involved in the medical treatment of chronic disease, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area.
期刊最新文献
Synchronized application of closed-loop NMES and precision tACS in post-stroke hand rehabilitation: a protocol of neurorehabilitation trial. Quantitative evaluation of risk factors for low back pain in young patients using synthetic magnetic resonance imaging and proton density fat fraction analyses. Association between serum pyridoxal 5'-phosphate levels and all-cause, cardiovascular mortality, and cardiovascular disease in adults: a population-based cohort study. The early diagnostic value of serum renalase level in diabetic kidney disease and diabetic macroangiopathy: a retrospective case-control study. Optimal treatment targets for lupus nephritis using per-protocol repeat kidney biopsy findings at 2 years and clinical data up to 5 years: a single-center observational study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1