Physician beliefs about abortion safety and their participation in abortion care

IF 1.4 3区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare Pub Date : 2023-09-12 DOI:10.1016/j.srhc.2023.100916
Laura E.T. Swan , Abigail S. Cutler , Madison Lands , Nicholas B. Schmuhl , Jenny A. Higgins
{"title":"Physician beliefs about abortion safety and their participation in abortion care","authors":"Laura E.T. Swan ,&nbsp;Abigail S. Cutler ,&nbsp;Madison Lands ,&nbsp;Nicholas B. Schmuhl ,&nbsp;Jenny A. Higgins","doi":"10.1016/j.srhc.2023.100916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To document physicians’ beliefs about abortion safety and the associations between these beliefs and physician support for, referral for, and participation in abortion care.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In a 2019 survey at the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, we assessed physicians’ abortion attitudes, beliefs, and practices (<em>N</em> = 893). We conducted bivariate analyses followed by logistic regression to document relationships between physician beliefs about abortion safety and their support for, referral to, and participation in abortion care.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Four-in-five physicians (78%, <em>n</em> = 690) believed that abortion is very or extremely safe. Medical specialty (Obstetrics-Gynecology vs. other; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 10.58, 95% CI: 1.41–79.56), educational exposure to abortion (aOR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.02–2.01), and religiosity (aOR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.41–0.85) were associated with physicians’ beliefs about the safety of abortion. Providers who believed that abortion was very/extremely safe were more likely to support medication (aOR = 2.99, 95% CI: 1.93–4.65) and procedural abortion (aOR = 3.56, 95% CI: 2.31–5.50) and refer patients for abortion care (aOR = 3.14, 95% CI: 1.90–5.01).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Although abortions are associated with extremely few adverse events, a sizable portion of surveyed physicians had incorrect perceptions of the safety of abortion. These beliefs were associated with decreased support and referrals for abortion care. Educational exposure to abortion is associated with more accurate assessments of abortion safety, underscoring the importance of training in this area. Considering the current abortion policy landscape, it is imperative for physicians to hold accurate knowledge about abortion so they can provide comprehensive counseling and, when indicated, referrals for safe and legal care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54199,"journal":{"name":"Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877575623001064","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To document physicians’ beliefs about abortion safety and the associations between these beliefs and physician support for, referral for, and participation in abortion care.

Methods

In a 2019 survey at the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, we assessed physicians’ abortion attitudes, beliefs, and practices (N = 893). We conducted bivariate analyses followed by logistic regression to document relationships between physician beliefs about abortion safety and their support for, referral to, and participation in abortion care.

Results

Four-in-five physicians (78%, n = 690) believed that abortion is very or extremely safe. Medical specialty (Obstetrics-Gynecology vs. other; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 10.58, 95% CI: 1.41–79.56), educational exposure to abortion (aOR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.02–2.01), and religiosity (aOR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.41–0.85) were associated with physicians’ beliefs about the safety of abortion. Providers who believed that abortion was very/extremely safe were more likely to support medication (aOR = 2.99, 95% CI: 1.93–4.65) and procedural abortion (aOR = 3.56, 95% CI: 2.31–5.50) and refer patients for abortion care (aOR = 3.14, 95% CI: 1.90–5.01).

Conclusion

Although abortions are associated with extremely few adverse events, a sizable portion of surveyed physicians had incorrect perceptions of the safety of abortion. These beliefs were associated with decreased support and referrals for abortion care. Educational exposure to abortion is associated with more accurate assessments of abortion safety, underscoring the importance of training in this area. Considering the current abortion policy landscape, it is imperative for physicians to hold accurate knowledge about abortion so they can provide comprehensive counseling and, when indicated, referrals for safe and legal care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医生对流产安全的看法及其对流产护理的参与
目的记录医生对堕胎安全的信念,以及这些信念与医生对堕胎护理的支持、转诊和参与之间的关系。方法在威斯康星大学医学与公共卫生学院2019年的一项调查中,我们评估了医生的堕胎态度、信仰和做法(N=893)。我们进行了双变量分析,然后进行了逻辑回归,以记录医生对堕胎安全的信念与他们对堕胎护理的支持、转诊和参与之间的关系。结果五分之四的医生(78%,n=690)认为堕胎是非常或极其安全的。医学专业(妇产科与其他;调整后的比值比[aOR]=10.58,95%CI:1.41-79.56)、堕胎教育程度(aOR=1.43,95%CI:1.02-2.01)和宗教信仰(aOR=0.59,95%CI:0.41-0.85)与医生对堕胎安全性的信念相关。认为堕胎非常/极为安全的提供者更有可能支持药物治疗(aOR=2.99,95%CI:1.93–4.65)和程序性堕胎(aOR=3.56,95%CI:2.31–5.50),并转介患者接受堕胎护理(aOR=1.14,95%CI:1.90–5.01)。结论尽管堕胎与极少数不良事件有关,相当一部分接受调查的医生对堕胎的安全性有错误的看法。这些信念与堕胎护理的支持和转诊减少有关。对堕胎的教育接触与对堕胎安全的更准确评估有关,强调了这一领域培训的重要性。考虑到当前的堕胎政策形势,医生必须掌握有关堕胎的准确知识,以便提供全面的咨询,并在需要时转诊以获得安全合法的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare
Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
73
审稿时长
45 days
期刊最新文献
Investigating the associations between early labour onset symptoms and self-diagnosed labour onset in a cohort study of primiparas Overuse of intrapartum CTG monitoring in low-risk women in Norway Editorial Board The conclusion of CTG overuse is not justified Hysterectomy and medical financial hardship among U.S. women
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1