Fresh Frozen Plasma Increases Hemorrhage in Blunt Traumatic Brain Injury and Uncontrolled Hemorrhagic Shock.

IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal Pub Date : 2023-01-29 DOI:10.5041/RMMJ.10489
Hilla Abergel, Miri Bidder, Itamar Ashkenazi, Leonid Reytman, Ricardo Alfici, Michael M Krausz
{"title":"Fresh Frozen Plasma Increases Hemorrhage in Blunt Traumatic Brain Injury and Uncontrolled Hemorrhagic Shock.","authors":"Hilla Abergel,&nbsp;Miri Bidder,&nbsp;Itamar Ashkenazi,&nbsp;Leonid Reytman,&nbsp;Ricardo Alfici,&nbsp;Michael M Krausz","doi":"10.5041/RMMJ.10489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Blunt traumatic brain injury (bTBI) and uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock (UCHS) are common causes of mortality in polytrauma. We studied the influence of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) resuscitation in a rat model with both bTBI and UCHS before achieving hemorrhage control.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The bTBI was induced by an external weight drop (200 g) onto the bare skull of anesthetized male Lewis (Lew/SdNHsd) rats; UCHS was induced by resection of two-thirds of the rats' tails. Fifteen minutes following trauma, bTBI+UCHS rats underwent resuscitation with FFP or lactated Ringer's solution (LR). Eight groups were evaluated: (1) Sham; (2) bTBI; (3) UCHS; (4) UCHS+FFP; (5) UCHS+LR; (6) bTBI+UCHS; (7) bTBI+UCHS+FFP; and (8) bTBI+UCHS+LR. Bleeding volume, hematocrit, lactate, mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate, and mortality were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 97 rats that survived the immediate trauma. Mean blood loss up to the start of resuscitation was similar among UCHS only and bTBI+UCHS rats (P=0.361). Following resuscitation, bleeding was more extensive in bTBI+UCHS+FFP rats (5.2 mL, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.7, 6.6) than in bTBI+UCHS+LR rats (2.5 mL, 95% CI 1.2, 3.8) and bTBI+UCHS rats (1.9 mL, 95% CI 0, 3.9) (P=0.005). Overall mortality increased if bleeding was above 4.5 mL (92.3% versus 8%; P<0.001). Mortality was 83.3% (10/12) in bTBI+UCHS+FFP rats, 41.7% (5/12) in bTBI+UCHS+LR rats, and 64.3% (9/14) in bTBI+UCHS rats.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The bTBI did not exacerbate bleeding in rats undergoing UCHS. Compared to LR, FFP resuscitation was associated with a significantly increased blood loss in bTBI+UCHS rats.</p>","PeriodicalId":46408,"journal":{"name":"Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9888485/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5041/RMMJ.10489","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Blunt traumatic brain injury (bTBI) and uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock (UCHS) are common causes of mortality in polytrauma. We studied the influence of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) resuscitation in a rat model with both bTBI and UCHS before achieving hemorrhage control.

Methods: The bTBI was induced by an external weight drop (200 g) onto the bare skull of anesthetized male Lewis (Lew/SdNHsd) rats; UCHS was induced by resection of two-thirds of the rats' tails. Fifteen minutes following trauma, bTBI+UCHS rats underwent resuscitation with FFP or lactated Ringer's solution (LR). Eight groups were evaluated: (1) Sham; (2) bTBI; (3) UCHS; (4) UCHS+FFP; (5) UCHS+LR; (6) bTBI+UCHS; (7) bTBI+UCHS+FFP; and (8) bTBI+UCHS+LR. Bleeding volume, hematocrit, lactate, mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate, and mortality were measured.

Results: The study included 97 rats that survived the immediate trauma. Mean blood loss up to the start of resuscitation was similar among UCHS only and bTBI+UCHS rats (P=0.361). Following resuscitation, bleeding was more extensive in bTBI+UCHS+FFP rats (5.2 mL, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.7, 6.6) than in bTBI+UCHS+LR rats (2.5 mL, 95% CI 1.2, 3.8) and bTBI+UCHS rats (1.9 mL, 95% CI 0, 3.9) (P=0.005). Overall mortality increased if bleeding was above 4.5 mL (92.3% versus 8%; P<0.001). Mortality was 83.3% (10/12) in bTBI+UCHS+FFP rats, 41.7% (5/12) in bTBI+UCHS+LR rats, and 64.3% (9/14) in bTBI+UCHS rats.

Conclusion: The bTBI did not exacerbate bleeding in rats undergoing UCHS. Compared to LR, FFP resuscitation was associated with a significantly increased blood loss in bTBI+UCHS rats.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新鲜冷冻血浆增加钝性外伤性脑损伤和失血性休克的出血。
背景:钝性创伤性脑损伤(bTBI)和未控制失血性休克(UCHS)是多发创伤的常见死亡原因。我们研究了新鲜冷冻血浆(FFP)复苏对bTBI和UCHS大鼠模型在实现出血控制之前的影响。方法:采用麻醉雄性Lewis (Lew/SdNHsd)大鼠裸骨外滴200 g诱导脑外伤;UCHS是通过切除大鼠三分之二的尾巴来诱导的。创伤后15分钟,bTBI+UCHS大鼠用FFP或乳酸林格氏液(LR)进行复苏。评估8组:(1)假手术;(2) bTBI;(3)排序;(4)排序+ FFP;(5)排序+ LR;(6) bTBI +排序;(7) bTBI +排序+ FFP;(8) bTBI+UCHS+LR。测量出血量、血细胞比容、乳酸、平均动脉压(MAP)、心率和死亡率。结果:本研究纳入97只直接创伤后存活的大鼠。仅UCHS和bTBI+UCHS大鼠在复苏开始前的平均失血量相似(P=0.361)。复苏后,bTBI+UCHS+FFP大鼠出血(5.2 mL, 95%可信区间[CI] 3.7, 6.6)比bTBI+UCHS+LR大鼠(2.5 mL, 95% CI 1.2, 3.8)和bTBI+UCHS大鼠(1.9 mL, 95% CI 0, 3.9)更广泛(P=0.005)。如果出血超过4.5 mL,总死亡率增加(92.3% vs 8%;结论:bTBI未加重UCHS大鼠出血。与LR相比,FFP复苏与bTBI+UCHS大鼠的出血量显著增加相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal
Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
55
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Antisemitism in Medicine: An International Perspective. Cognitive Impairments in Viral Hepatitis Patients: Causes, Manifestations, and Impact on Quality of Life. Is Minimally Invasive Surgery the Standard of Care for Ventral Hernia Repair? The "Immigrant Medical Services" Organization from the End of the British Mandate Through the First Years of Israel (1944-1953). The Relationship between Removable Dental Prostheses and Brain Activity in Elderly Individuals: Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1