Criteria for the Use, Processing, and Disposal of Flexible Endoscope Cleaning Brushes.

Q4 Medicine Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-08 DOI:10.2345/0899-8205-57.1.1
Naiara Bussolotti Garcia, Adriana Cristina de Oliveira
{"title":"Criteria for the Use, Processing, and Disposal of Flexible Endoscope Cleaning Brushes.","authors":"Naiara Bussolotti Garcia, Adriana Cristina de Oliveira","doi":"10.2345/0899-8205-57.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objectives:</i></b> To ensure effectiveness in the endoscope channel cleaning process, using functional brushes that are in good condition is necessary. This study sought to identify the criteria for acquiring, using, and disposing of cleaning brushes at endoscopy facilities in Brazil. We further sought to evaluate the conditions of the cleaning brushes in use in the facilities. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This cross-sectional study was conducted between July 2021 and January 2022. Personnel responsible for processing endoscopes were interviewed regarding the use, processing, and disposal of flexible endoscope cleaning brushes. In addition, the brushes used to clean the equipment were inspected. <b><i>Results:</i></b> All participants interviewed reported the practice of brushing endoscope channels. Of them, 60% noted the use of disposable brushes, with 40% using reusable brushes. None of the facilities interviewed reported discarding disposable brushes after use. The protocols for disposal of brushes included disposing due to bristle wear (70%), disposal at the end of the day (20%), and an absence of disposal protocols (10%). In addition, 30% of facilities did not clean the bristles before reintroducing them into the channel/lumen, and no facility had an established routine for cleaning brushes between uses. Inspection of brushes revealed that only 20% of facilities had new brushes with no signs of wear or damage. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The use of inappropriate brushes/sponges for cleaning endoscope channels and the lack of criteria for the reuse and disposal of brushes increases the risk of cross-contamination, internal damage to channels, and biofilm formation.</p>","PeriodicalId":35656,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10512984/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2345/0899-8205-57.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To ensure effectiveness in the endoscope channel cleaning process, using functional brushes that are in good condition is necessary. This study sought to identify the criteria for acquiring, using, and disposing of cleaning brushes at endoscopy facilities in Brazil. We further sought to evaluate the conditions of the cleaning brushes in use in the facilities. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted between July 2021 and January 2022. Personnel responsible for processing endoscopes were interviewed regarding the use, processing, and disposal of flexible endoscope cleaning brushes. In addition, the brushes used to clean the equipment were inspected. Results: All participants interviewed reported the practice of brushing endoscope channels. Of them, 60% noted the use of disposable brushes, with 40% using reusable brushes. None of the facilities interviewed reported discarding disposable brushes after use. The protocols for disposal of brushes included disposing due to bristle wear (70%), disposal at the end of the day (20%), and an absence of disposal protocols (10%). In addition, 30% of facilities did not clean the bristles before reintroducing them into the channel/lumen, and no facility had an established routine for cleaning brushes between uses. Inspection of brushes revealed that only 20% of facilities had new brushes with no signs of wear or damage. Conclusion: The use of inappropriate brushes/sponges for cleaning endoscope channels and the lack of criteria for the reuse and disposal of brushes increases the risk of cross-contamination, internal damage to channels, and biofilm formation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
柔性内窥镜清洁刷的使用、加工和处置标准。
目的:为了确保内窥镜通道清洁过程的有效性,使用状态良好的功能刷是必要的。本研究旨在确定巴西内窥镜设施中清洁刷的获取、使用和处置标准。我们进一步试图评估设施中使用的清洁刷的状况。方法:这项横断面研究于2021年7月至2022年1月进行。就柔性内窥镜清洁刷的使用、处理和处置,对负责处理内窥镜的人员进行了访谈。此外,还对用于清洁设备的刷子进行了检查。结果:所有受访的参与者都报告了刷内窥镜通道的做法。其中,60%的人注意到使用了一次性刷子,40%的人使用了可重复使用的刷子。接受采访的机构均未报告使用后丢弃一次性刷子。刷子的处理方案包括因刷毛磨损而进行的处理(70%)、一天结束时的处理(20%)和缺乏处理方案(10%)。此外,30%的机构在将刷毛重新引入通道/管腔之前没有清洁刷毛,并且没有任何机构制定在使用之间清洁刷毛的常规程序。对刷子的检查显示,只有20%的设施有新刷子,没有磨损或损坏的迹象。结论:使用不合适的刷子/海绵清洁内窥镜通道,并且缺乏刷子的重复使用和处理标准,增加了交叉污染、通道内部损伤和生物膜形成的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology
Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology Computer Science-Computer Networks and Communications
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: AAMI publishes Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology (BI&T) a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the developers, managers, and users of medical instrumentation and technology.
期刊最新文献
Effect of Gamma and X-ray Irradiation on Polymers Commonly Used in Healthcare Products. Effect of Vaporized Hydrogen Peroxide and Nitrogen Dioxide Sterilization on Nitinol. Toward Enhanced Machine-Based Release in X-ray Sterilization. Beyond Endoscopes: Pilot Study of Surgical Instrument Lumen Inspection. Advantages and Limitations of Physical and Virtual Dose Mapping.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1