Factors influencing the self-perceived mobility of active unilateral lower limb amputees assessed with the Prosthetic Mobility Questionnaire: a brief report.
{"title":"Factors influencing the self-perceived mobility of active unilateral lower limb amputees assessed with the Prosthetic Mobility Questionnaire: a brief report.","authors":"Federico Morosato, Cosimo Gentile, Arianna Di Bernardo, Emanuele Gruppioni, Antonella Miccio","doi":"10.1097/MRR.0000000000000560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Prosthetic Mobility Questionnaire (PMQ 2.0) represents a reliable solution for evaluating amputees' self-perceived mobility. The study aimed to evaluate the perceived mobility of middle-aged users with a traumatic amputation using the PMQ 2.0 and to assess the influence of age, stump and phantom limb pain, amputation level, time since amputation, and prosthesis use on it. Fifty subjects were recruited. The median value of the score was higher than previously published reference values, reflecting the 'active' mobility status of the sample. The hours of prosthesis use per day explained about 21% of the variance of the questionnaire score and was a significant predictor of perceived mobility. Reference values for the recently developed PMQ 2.0 survey and relative to active, traumatic amputees were reported. As prosthesis use was a significant predictor of the amputees' perceived mobility, prolonged use of the artificial limb should be always encouraged in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":14301,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research","volume":"46 1","pages":"108-111"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000560","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The Prosthetic Mobility Questionnaire (PMQ 2.0) represents a reliable solution for evaluating amputees' self-perceived mobility. The study aimed to evaluate the perceived mobility of middle-aged users with a traumatic amputation using the PMQ 2.0 and to assess the influence of age, stump and phantom limb pain, amputation level, time since amputation, and prosthesis use on it. Fifty subjects were recruited. The median value of the score was higher than previously published reference values, reflecting the 'active' mobility status of the sample. The hours of prosthesis use per day explained about 21% of the variance of the questionnaire score and was a significant predictor of perceived mobility. Reference values for the recently developed PMQ 2.0 survey and relative to active, traumatic amputees were reported. As prosthesis use was a significant predictor of the amputees' perceived mobility, prolonged use of the artificial limb should be always encouraged in clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Rehabilitation Research is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary forum for the publication of research into functioning, disability and contextual factors experienced by persons of all ages in both developed and developing societies. The wealth of information offered makes the journal a valuable resource for researchers, practitioners, and administrators in such fields as rehabilitation medicine, outcome measurement nursing, social and vocational rehabilitation/case management, return to work, special education, social policy, social work and social welfare, sociology, psychology, psychiatry assistive technology and environmental factors/disability. Areas of interest include functioning and disablement throughout the life cycle; rehabilitation programmes for persons with physical, sensory, mental and developmental disabilities; measurement of functioning and disability; special education and vocational rehabilitation; equipment access and transportation; information technology; independent living; consumer, legal, economic and sociopolitical aspects of functioning, disability and contextual factors.