Evaluation of antibody response anti SARS-Cov-2: A retrospective observational study (Marche-Italy).

Igiene e sanita pubblica Pub Date : 2023-01-01
Isabella Baglioni, Alessia Galli, Chiara Gatti, Simona Tufoni, Renato Rocchi, Federico Lattanzi, Fabio Toia, Adoriano Santarelli, Stefano Marcelli
{"title":"Evaluation of antibody response anti SARS-Cov-2: A retrospective observational study (Marche-Italy).","authors":"Isabella Baglioni,&nbsp;Alessia Galli,&nbsp;Chiara Gatti,&nbsp;Simona Tufoni,&nbsp;Renato Rocchi,&nbsp;Federico Lattanzi,&nbsp;Fabio Toia,&nbsp;Adoriano Santarelli,&nbsp;Stefano Marcelli","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>COVID-19 has hit every country in the world. Almost a quarter of a billion cases and nearly 5 million deaths reported globally as of late September 2021. Compared to over 6 billion doses of COVID-19 vaccine administered, the pandemic does not seem to disappear. The duration of protective immunity is currently not defined. Primary immune responses are inevitably declining and the continuous transmission of increasingly worrying viral variants.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the antibody response at 120 and 180 days in employees of an hospital of Marche (Italy) who have completed the vaccination cycle with Pzifer-Biontech vaccine and to highlight the correlation with quantitative and qualitative variables. The secondary objective is to study the nature and frequency of adverse events in relation to variables such as comorbidity, age, gender, working areas and developed antibody titer.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An observational retrospective study was carried out to evaluate the antibody response at 120 and 180 days. Subjects receiving a double dose of vaccine at least 21 days apart and those receiving the second dose of the same vaccine between 18 January 2021 and 31 March 2021 shall be considered. The study included non-probability sampling of convenience. All parties have provided informed written consent to access personal and clinical data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample is composed by 1.115 subjects. The results of the study reveal an important immune response detected by IgG dosage, both at 120 and 180 days after the second dose of Sars-Cov-2 vaccine mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine (Pzifer-Biontech), other than very rare exceptions. Antibody values are higher among hospital workers compared to those working in other areas, both 120 and 180 days. These values are even higher in the health professionals who provide assistance in wards with positive Covid patients, both at 120 days (p=0.06) and at 180 days; the mean values of IgG are statistically higher in direct assistance of Covid patients at 180 days(p=0.029). The most frequent adverse drug events after the second dose of vaccine were pain at the site of inoculation of the vaccine (70.7%), fatigue (35%) and arthralgia (19%). It was finally shown that people with diabetes or smokers had an average antibody response statistically lower than 120 days and 180 days from the second dose.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>This study leads to the conclusion that the second dose of vaccine Sars-Cov-2 vaccine mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine allows a consistent antibody response. Further multicentric studies are needed to investigate the antibody response to vaccination Sars-Cov-2 mRNA BNT162b2.</p>","PeriodicalId":73329,"journal":{"name":"Igiene e sanita pubblica","volume":"80 1","pages":"13-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Igiene e sanita pubblica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: COVID-19 has hit every country in the world. Almost a quarter of a billion cases and nearly 5 million deaths reported globally as of late September 2021. Compared to over 6 billion doses of COVID-19 vaccine administered, the pandemic does not seem to disappear. The duration of protective immunity is currently not defined. Primary immune responses are inevitably declining and the continuous transmission of increasingly worrying viral variants.

Objective: The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the antibody response at 120 and 180 days in employees of an hospital of Marche (Italy) who have completed the vaccination cycle with Pzifer-Biontech vaccine and to highlight the correlation with quantitative and qualitative variables. The secondary objective is to study the nature and frequency of adverse events in relation to variables such as comorbidity, age, gender, working areas and developed antibody titer.

Materials and methods: An observational retrospective study was carried out to evaluate the antibody response at 120 and 180 days. Subjects receiving a double dose of vaccine at least 21 days apart and those receiving the second dose of the same vaccine between 18 January 2021 and 31 March 2021 shall be considered. The study included non-probability sampling of convenience. All parties have provided informed written consent to access personal and clinical data.

Results: The sample is composed by 1.115 subjects. The results of the study reveal an important immune response detected by IgG dosage, both at 120 and 180 days after the second dose of Sars-Cov-2 vaccine mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine (Pzifer-Biontech), other than very rare exceptions. Antibody values are higher among hospital workers compared to those working in other areas, both 120 and 180 days. These values are even higher in the health professionals who provide assistance in wards with positive Covid patients, both at 120 days (p=0.06) and at 180 days; the mean values of IgG are statistically higher in direct assistance of Covid patients at 180 days(p=0.029). The most frequent adverse drug events after the second dose of vaccine were pain at the site of inoculation of the vaccine (70.7%), fatigue (35%) and arthralgia (19%). It was finally shown that people with diabetes or smokers had an average antibody response statistically lower than 120 days and 180 days from the second dose.

Discussion and conclusion: This study leads to the conclusion that the second dose of vaccine Sars-Cov-2 vaccine mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine allows a consistent antibody response. Further multicentric studies are needed to investigate the antibody response to vaccination Sars-Cov-2 mRNA BNT162b2.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评价抗SARS-Cov-2抗体反应:一项回顾性观察研究(Marche-Italy)。
背景:COVID-19已经袭击了世界上每个国家。截至2021年9月下旬,全球报告了近25亿例病例和近500万人死亡。与已接种的60多亿剂COVID-19疫苗相比,大流行似乎并未消失。保护性免疫的持续时间目前尚未确定。原发性免疫反应不可避免地下降,不断传播越来越令人担忧的病毒变体。目的:本研究的主要目的是评估意大利Marche医院完成Pzifer-Biontech疫苗接种周期的员工在120天和180天的抗体反应,并强调定量和定性变量之间的相关性。次要目标是研究与合并症、年龄、性别、工作区域和抗体滴度等变量相关的不良事件的性质和频率。材料和方法:采用观察性回顾性研究,评估120天和180天的抗体反应。应考虑在2021年1月18日至2021年3月31日期间间隔至少21天接受双剂疫苗接种的受试者,以及在2021年1月18日至2021年3月31日期间接受第二剂相同疫苗接种的受试者。本研究采用非概率方便抽样。各方已提供知情的书面同意,以获取个人和临床数据。结果:样本由1.115名受试者组成。研究结果显示,在第二剂Sars-Cov-2疫苗mRNA BNT162b2疫苗(Pzifer-Biontech)后120和180天,IgG剂量检测到重要的免疫应答,除了非常罕见的例外。无论是120天还是180天,医院工作人员的抗体值都高于其他领域的工作人员。在120天(p=0.06)和180天时,在有阳性患者的病房提供帮助的卫生专业人员中,这些值甚至更高;直接援助患者180 d时IgG均值显著高于对照组(p=0.029)。第二剂疫苗后最常见的药物不良事件是接种部位疼痛(70.7%)、疲劳(35%)和关节痛(19%)。最后表明,糖尿病患者或吸烟者的平均抗体反应在统计上低于第二次剂量的120天和180天。讨论与结论:本研究得出第二剂疫苗Sars-Cov-2疫苗mRNA BNT162b2疫苗可产生一致的抗体应答。需要进一步的多中心研究来研究接种Sars-Cov-2 mRNA BNT162b2的抗体反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Epidemiological Assessment of Malaria Prevalence among Children Under 5 in Cameroon: A Cross-Sectional Study. Parental Leave and Corporate Welfare at the Territorial Health Company of Fermo. A Cross- Sectional Prospective Study (Marche, Italy). Qualitative research on clinical risk perception in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit. Sterilization of infective health care waste in hospitals. Effect of yoga in quality of life among patients with oral cancer: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1