Running Interlocking Horizontal Mattress-A New Technique versus Modified Kessler in Extensor Tendon Injuries: A Comparative Study.

IF 0.3 Q4 SURGERY Journal of Hand and Microsurgery Pub Date : 2021-04-13 eCollection Date: 2023-02-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0041-1727297
Rohit Shaju, Sunil Sharma, Kshiteej Dhull
{"title":"Running Interlocking Horizontal Mattress-A New Technique versus Modified Kessler in Extensor Tendon Injuries: A Comparative Study.","authors":"Rohit Shaju, Sunil Sharma, Kshiteej Dhull","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1727297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>  Pursuit for a new technique, which could be placed on flat extensor tendons and strong enough to withstand the tension forces of early mobilization to prevent stiffness, started few decades ago. We evaluated the new technique of tendon repair using running interlocking horizontal mattress (RIHM) sutures followed by early controlled motion protocol in traumatic extensor tendon injuries and compared it to modified Kessler technique. <b>Materials and Methods</b>  We conducted a prospective randomized interventional study of 18 months' duration, with 30 patients. A total of 103 tendons were repaired, of which 58 were repaired using modified Kessler technique and 45 were repaired using RIHM technique. Postoperatively, patients underwent the early controlled motion protocol and the results were evaluated using the criteria of Miller. <b>Results</b>  Majority of the patients had excellent results (53.3%) and 46.67% had good results in the RIHM group while most of the patients in modified Kessler group had only fair results (80%), and only 20% had good results while none had excellent results. <b>Conclusion</b>  RIHM suture is an easy-to-learn and effective technique for tendon repair with comparable operative duration and with better overall result than modified Kessler technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":45368,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand and Microsurgery","volume":"15 1","pages":"59-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9904974/pdf/10-1055-s-0041-1727297.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand and Microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1727297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction  Pursuit for a new technique, which could be placed on flat extensor tendons and strong enough to withstand the tension forces of early mobilization to prevent stiffness, started few decades ago. We evaluated the new technique of tendon repair using running interlocking horizontal mattress (RIHM) sutures followed by early controlled motion protocol in traumatic extensor tendon injuries and compared it to modified Kessler technique. Materials and Methods  We conducted a prospective randomized interventional study of 18 months' duration, with 30 patients. A total of 103 tendons were repaired, of which 58 were repaired using modified Kessler technique and 45 were repaired using RIHM technique. Postoperatively, patients underwent the early controlled motion protocol and the results were evaluated using the criteria of Miller. Results  Majority of the patients had excellent results (53.3%) and 46.67% had good results in the RIHM group while most of the patients in modified Kessler group had only fair results (80%), and only 20% had good results while none had excellent results. Conclusion  RIHM suture is an easy-to-learn and effective technique for tendon repair with comparable operative duration and with better overall result than modified Kessler technique.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跑步联锁水平床垫--新技术与改良版 Kessler 在伸肌腱损伤中的对比研究:比较研究。
导言:几十年前,人们就开始寻求一种新技术,这种技术可用于平坦的伸肌腱,其强度足以承受早期活动时的张力,从而防止僵硬。我们评估了在外伤性伸肌腱损伤中使用运行交错水平褥式(RIHM)缝合术进行肌腱修复的新技术,并将其与改良的 Kessler 技术进行了比较。材料与方法 我们对 30 名患者进行了为期 18 个月的前瞻性随机干预研究。共修复了 103 条肌腱,其中 58 条采用改良 Kessler 技术修复,45 条采用 RIHM 技术修复。术后,患者接受了早期控制运动方案,并根据米勒的标准对结果进行了评估。结果 在 RIHM 组中,大多数患者的效果极佳(53.3%),46.67% 的患者效果良好,而在改良 Kessler 组中,大多数患者的效果一般(80%),只有 20% 的患者效果良好,没有患者效果极佳。结论 RIHM 缝合术是一种简单易学、效果显著的肌腱修复技术,手术时间与改良 Kessler 技术相当,总体效果优于改良 Kessler 技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
The modified placenta model for microsurgery training: Recommended methods for comprehensive microsurgery experience. Ulnar shaft diameter as it relates to plate osteosynthesis: A cadaveric study. A cross-sectional quantitative analysis of the readability and quality of online resources regarding thumb carpometacarpal joint replacement surgery. Diagnostic and management strategies for pseudoaneurysm of the ulnar artery: A scoping review. Predictors of leech therapy failure in revascularized and replanted digits.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1