Is Greenness Associated with Dementia? A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-analysis.

IF 7.4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Current Environmental Health Reports Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1007/s40572-022-00365-5
Federico Zagnoli, Tommaso Filippini, Marcia P Jimenez, Lauren A Wise, Elizabeth E Hatch, Marco Vinceti
{"title":"Is Greenness Associated with Dementia? A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-analysis.","authors":"Federico Zagnoli,&nbsp;Tommaso Filippini,&nbsp;Marcia P Jimenez,&nbsp;Lauren A Wise,&nbsp;Elizabeth E Hatch,&nbsp;Marco Vinceti","doi":"10.1007/s40572-022-00365-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>We assessed the relation between environmental greenness and risk of dementia and cognitive impairment, based on a systematic review and meta-analysis up to March 30, 2022, characterizing whenever possible the shape of the association using dose-response meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Twelve studies were included in this review, either using normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) or land use/cover (LU/LC) methodology to assess greenness. Comparing the highest versus lowest exposure categories of greenness assessed using the NDVI (6 studies) or LU/LC (6 studies), we found no association with dementia. Dose-response meta-analysis of the association between greenness measured by LU/LC and dementia, based on only 3 studies, indicated a U-shaped association, but estimates were imprecise. Our systematic review and meta-analysis provided some evidence of a slight inverse association between greenness and dementia at intermediate exposure levels, but not at high levels. Potential methodological limitations, such as exposure misclassification and unmeasured confounding, may have affected the results.</p>","PeriodicalId":10775,"journal":{"name":"Current Environmental Health Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9729322/pdf/","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Environmental Health Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-022-00365-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Purpose of review: We assessed the relation between environmental greenness and risk of dementia and cognitive impairment, based on a systematic review and meta-analysis up to March 30, 2022, characterizing whenever possible the shape of the association using dose-response meta-analysis.

Recent findings: Twelve studies were included in this review, either using normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) or land use/cover (LU/LC) methodology to assess greenness. Comparing the highest versus lowest exposure categories of greenness assessed using the NDVI (6 studies) or LU/LC (6 studies), we found no association with dementia. Dose-response meta-analysis of the association between greenness measured by LU/LC and dementia, based on only 3 studies, indicated a U-shaped association, but estimates were imprecise. Our systematic review and meta-analysis provided some evidence of a slight inverse association between greenness and dementia at intermediate exposure levels, but not at high levels. Potential methodological limitations, such as exposure misclassification and unmeasured confounding, may have affected the results.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绿色与痴呆有关吗?系统评价和剂量-反应荟萃分析。
综述目的:我们基于一项截至2022年3月30日的系统综述和荟萃分析,评估了环境绿色度与痴呆和认知障碍风险之间的关系,并尽可能使用剂量-反应荟萃分析来表征这种关联的形态。最新发现:本综述包括12项研究,采用归一化植被指数(NDVI)或土地利用/覆盖(LU/LC)方法评估绿化。比较使用NDVI(6项研究)或LU/LC(6项研究)评估的最高和最低暴露度类别,我们发现与痴呆没有关联。仅基于3项研究,对LU/LC测量的绿度与痴呆之间的关联进行剂量-反应荟萃分析,显示u型关联,但估计不精确。我们的系统回顾和荟萃分析提供了一些证据,表明在中等暴露水平下,绿化和痴呆之间存在轻微的负相关关系,但在高暴露水平下则不然。潜在的方法学局限性,如暴露错误分类和未测量的混杂,可能影响结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
1.30%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Current Environmental Health Reports provides up-to-date expert reviews in environmental health. The goal is to evaluate and synthesize original research in all disciplines relevant for environmental health sciences, including basic research, clinical research, epidemiology, and environmental policy.
期刊最新文献
Mechanisms of Metal-Induced Hepatic Inflammation. Carcinogenic Mechanisms of Hexavalent Chromium: From DNA Breaks to Chromosome Instability and Neoplastic Transformation. Toxic Metals and Metalloids in Food: Current Status, Health Risks, and Mitigation Strategies. Using Geovisualizations to Educate the Public About Environmental Health Hazards: What Works and Why. Correction: Tear Fluid as a Matrix for Biomonitoring Environmental and Chemical Exposures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1