Determinants of coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine acceptance, hesitancy, and barriers among healthcare workers in Ismailia, Egypt: a mixed methods study.

Amani Waheed, Noha M Abu Bakr Elsaid, Mayada Ghweeba, Nermine Elmaraghy, Shimaa A Al-Touny, Nader Nemr, Rania M Kishk, Hebatalla M Aly
{"title":"Determinants of coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine acceptance, hesitancy, and barriers among healthcare workers in Ismailia, Egypt: a mixed methods study.","authors":"Amani Waheed,&nbsp;Noha M Abu Bakr Elsaid,&nbsp;Mayada Ghweeba,&nbsp;Nermine Elmaraghy,&nbsp;Shimaa A Al-Touny,&nbsp;Nader Nemr,&nbsp;Rania M Kishk,&nbsp;Hebatalla M Aly","doi":"10.1186/s42506-022-00122-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine acceptance among healthcare workers (HCWs) plays a fundamental role in combating the COVID-19 pandemic. Vaccination acceptance depends on perceptions of competence and motives of the providers, producers, health professionals, and policymakers. This study aimed to identify the frequency and determinants of COVID-19 vaccine uptake acceptance, hesitancy, and barriers among HCWs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 500 HCWs from 3 different hospital affiliations in Ismailia Governorate, Egypt, were included in this mixed methods study. The study was conducted between March and April 2021 through two phases. Phase 1 included a cross-sectional study using a self-administered questionnaire with inquiries about different determinants of vaccine acceptance, hesitancy, and barriers, which was completed either electronically in a Google form or a hard printed copy. Phase 2 included four focus group discussions to explore the determinants in depth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of participants was 33.9 ± 7.9 years, 70% were females, 51.2% were nurses, and 28.6% were physicians. Of the 500 HCWs, only 27.8% accepted taking the vaccine immediately, 49.2% refused, and 23% were hesitant. Vaccine safety was the highest associated factor with vaccine acceptance (odds ratio (OR) = 6.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.132-12.619), followed by previous uptake of influenza vaccine (OR = 3.3, 95% CI 2.048-5.217) and vaccine effectiveness (OR = 2.6, 95% CI 1.282-5.262). The main barriers to vaccine acceptance were mistrust in governmental policies during the pandemic or in the healthcare facility they work in. Hesitancy was common among females and nurses and was attributed to three prominent factors, including safety concerns, negative stories, and personal knowledge.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The vaccine acceptance frequency among HCWs was considered low, as the majority either refused or was hesitant about taking the vaccine. Concerns about vaccine safety and effectiveness were significant determinants of vaccine acceptance. Factors related to trust were the main barriers to vaccine uptake. The health authority should establish a surveillance system for side effects of the COVID-19 vaccine and communicate this information between HCWs to decrease their worries about safety and increase vaccine uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":22819,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association","volume":"97 1","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9741945/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42506-022-00122-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine acceptance among healthcare workers (HCWs) plays a fundamental role in combating the COVID-19 pandemic. Vaccination acceptance depends on perceptions of competence and motives of the providers, producers, health professionals, and policymakers. This study aimed to identify the frequency and determinants of COVID-19 vaccine uptake acceptance, hesitancy, and barriers among HCWs.

Methods: A total of 500 HCWs from 3 different hospital affiliations in Ismailia Governorate, Egypt, were included in this mixed methods study. The study was conducted between March and April 2021 through two phases. Phase 1 included a cross-sectional study using a self-administered questionnaire with inquiries about different determinants of vaccine acceptance, hesitancy, and barriers, which was completed either electronically in a Google form or a hard printed copy. Phase 2 included four focus group discussions to explore the determinants in depth.

Results: The mean age of participants was 33.9 ± 7.9 years, 70% were females, 51.2% were nurses, and 28.6% were physicians. Of the 500 HCWs, only 27.8% accepted taking the vaccine immediately, 49.2% refused, and 23% were hesitant. Vaccine safety was the highest associated factor with vaccine acceptance (odds ratio (OR) = 6.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.132-12.619), followed by previous uptake of influenza vaccine (OR = 3.3, 95% CI 2.048-5.217) and vaccine effectiveness (OR = 2.6, 95% CI 1.282-5.262). The main barriers to vaccine acceptance were mistrust in governmental policies during the pandemic or in the healthcare facility they work in. Hesitancy was common among females and nurses and was attributed to three prominent factors, including safety concerns, negative stories, and personal knowledge.

Conclusions: The vaccine acceptance frequency among HCWs was considered low, as the majority either refused or was hesitant about taking the vaccine. Concerns about vaccine safety and effectiveness were significant determinants of vaccine acceptance. Factors related to trust were the main barriers to vaccine uptake. The health authority should establish a surveillance system for side effects of the COVID-19 vaccine and communicate this information between HCWs to decrease their worries about safety and increase vaccine uptake.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃及伊斯梅利亚卫生保健工作者对2019冠状病毒病疫苗接受、犹豫和障碍的决定因素:一项混合方法研究
背景:医护人员对2019冠状病毒病疫苗的接受度在抗击COVID-19大流行中起着至关重要的作用。疫苗接种接受程度取决于对提供者、生产者、卫生专业人员和决策者的能力和动机的看法。本研究旨在确定卫生保健工作者中COVID-19疫苗接种接受、犹豫和障碍的频率和决定因素。方法:来自埃及伊斯梅利亚省3家不同医院的500名卫生保健员被纳入这项混合方法研究。该研究于2021年3月至4月分两个阶段进行。第一阶段包括一项横断面研究,使用自我管理的问卷调查,询问疫苗接受、犹豫和障碍的不同决定因素,以谷歌表格的电子形式或硬拷贝完成。第二阶段包括四个焦点小组讨论,以深入探讨决定因素。结果:参与者平均年龄为33.9±7.9岁,女性占70%,护士占51.2%,医生占28.6%。500名卫生保健工作者中,只有27.8%的人同意立即接种疫苗,49.2%的人拒绝接种,23%的人犹豫不决。疫苗安全性是疫苗接受度最高的相关因素(优势比(OR) = 6.3, 95%可信区间(CI) 3.132-12.619),其次是流感疫苗的既往接种(OR = 3.3, 95% CI 2.048-5.217)和疫苗有效性(OR = 2.6, 95% CI 1.282-5.262)。疫苗接受的主要障碍是对大流行期间政府政策或他们所在的卫生保健机构的不信任。犹豫在女性和护士中很常见,并归因于三个主要因素,包括安全问题、负面故事和个人知识。结论:卫生保健工作者接受疫苗的频率较低,大多数人拒绝接种疫苗或对接种疫苗犹豫不决。对疫苗安全性和有效性的关注是疫苗接受与否的重要决定因素。与信任有关的因素是疫苗接种的主要障碍。卫生当局应建立COVID-19疫苗副作用监测系统,并在卫生保健工作者之间沟通这一信息,以减少他们对安全性的担忧,增加疫苗的吸收率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal accepts papers of original research which are not being considered for publication elsewhere and which contribute to the advancement of knowledge of Public Health at large
期刊最新文献
Metabolic syndrome prediction based on body composition indices. Pattern of antibiotic use among children caregivers: a cross-sectional study. Correction: Framework for developing cost-effectiveness analysis threshold: the case of Egypt. Psychological antecedents of vaccine inequity: keys to improve the rates of vaccination. Matters arising: On the cost-effectiveness for the Italian National Health Service of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine vs gemcitabine alone in metastatic pancreatic cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1