The role of carotid ultrasound in patients with non-lateralizing neurological complaints.

Shweta Varade, Abinayaa Ravichandran, Erafat Rehim, Hussam Yacoub, Rose Duncan, Hope Kincaid, Megan C Leary, John Castaldo
{"title":"The role of carotid ultrasound in patients with non-lateralizing neurological complaints.","authors":"Shweta Varade,&nbsp;Abinayaa Ravichandran,&nbsp;Erafat Rehim,&nbsp;Hussam Yacoub,&nbsp;Rose Duncan,&nbsp;Hope Kincaid,&nbsp;Megan C Leary,&nbsp;John Castaldo","doi":"10.1080/21548331.2022.2144066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In the United States, approximately 18-25% of carotid duplex ultrasound (CUS) studies are ordered to assess patients with non-lateralizing neurological complaints such as syncope, blurry vision, lightheadedness, headache, and altered mental status. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the benefit of CUS in the evaluation of patients presenting with non-lateralizing signs or symptoms.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis to assess the degree and laterality of carotid stenosis among patients with non-lateralizing neurological complaints who underwent CUS interpreted by certified vascular neurologists over a period of 3 years. The primary endpoint was to identify the prevalence of moderate-to-severe carotid artery stenosis among 280 patients who met inclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 17.7% of CUS studies were ordered for non-lateralizing symptoms. Two hundred and sixty-one patients (93.21%) had either normal imaging or mild carotid stenosis of <50%. Nineteen patients (6.79%) were found to have stenosis of ≥50%. In this subgroup, age and known preexisting carotid artery atherosclerotic disease were the only variables found to have a statistically significant association with the level of stenosis found on CUS. Two patients with asymptomatic stenosis of >70% underwent a revascularization procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>At least 17.7% of CUS studies were completed for non-lateralizing symptoms. The study is of low-yield with the prevalence of moderate-to-severe stenosis being comparable to that in the general asymptomatic population. We conclude that there is minimal clinical value in the use of CUS to investigate non-lateralizing neurological complaints, resulting in unnecessary healthcare costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":35045,"journal":{"name":"Hospital practice (1995)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital practice (1995)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21548331.2022.2144066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: In the United States, approximately 18-25% of carotid duplex ultrasound (CUS) studies are ordered to assess patients with non-lateralizing neurological complaints such as syncope, blurry vision, lightheadedness, headache, and altered mental status. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the benefit of CUS in the evaluation of patients presenting with non-lateralizing signs or symptoms.

Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis to assess the degree and laterality of carotid stenosis among patients with non-lateralizing neurological complaints who underwent CUS interpreted by certified vascular neurologists over a period of 3 years. The primary endpoint was to identify the prevalence of moderate-to-severe carotid artery stenosis among 280 patients who met inclusion criteria.

Results: A total of 17.7% of CUS studies were ordered for non-lateralizing symptoms. Two hundred and sixty-one patients (93.21%) had either normal imaging or mild carotid stenosis of <50%. Nineteen patients (6.79%) were found to have stenosis of ≥50%. In this subgroup, age and known preexisting carotid artery atherosclerotic disease were the only variables found to have a statistically significant association with the level of stenosis found on CUS. Two patients with asymptomatic stenosis of >70% underwent a revascularization procedure.

Conclusion: At least 17.7% of CUS studies were completed for non-lateralizing symptoms. The study is of low-yield with the prevalence of moderate-to-severe stenosis being comparable to that in the general asymptomatic population. We conclude that there is minimal clinical value in the use of CUS to investigate non-lateralizing neurological complaints, resulting in unnecessary healthcare costs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颈动脉超声在非侧化神经疾患患者中的作用。
目的:在美国,大约18-25%的颈动脉双相超声(CUS)研究被用于评估非侧化神经系统疾病,如晕厥、视力模糊、头晕、头痛和精神状态改变。本研究的目的是评估CUS在评估出现非侧化体征或症状的患者中的益处。材料和方法:我们进行了一项回顾性分析,以评估在3年的时间里由有资格的血管神经科医生进行CUS解释的非偏侧神经系统疾病患者的颈动脉狭窄程度和偏侧性。主要终点是确定280名符合纳入标准的患者中中度至重度颈动脉狭窄的患病率。结果:共有17.7%的CUS研究是针对非侧化症状。261例(93.21%)影像学正常或颈动脉轻度狭窄的患者(70%)接受了血管重建术。结论:至少17.7%的CUS研究是针对非侧化症状完成的。该研究是低收益的,中度至重度狭窄的患病率与一般无症状人群相当。我们的结论是,使用CUS来调查非侧化神经系统疾病的临床价值很小,导致不必要的医疗费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hospital practice (1995)
Hospital practice (1995) Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊最新文献
An insight into the updated pharmacotherapy of metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) or metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) in lean individuals: a review. Chest tube size selection for pleural effusion: from the perspective of thoracic surgeons and pulmonologists. Prescription for crisis: the compounding effect of community drug shortages on Lebanon's healthcare system. Outcomes and complications of heart failure with iron deficiency anemia: a nationwide analysis. Benign acute myositis in an adult: case-based review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1