Assessment of brain natriuretic peptide and copeptin as correlates of blood pressure in chronic hypertensive pregnant women.

IF 2.6 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Clinical Hypertension Pub Date : 2022-12-15 DOI:10.1186/s40885-022-00221-6
Chika J Okwor, Kayode S Adedapo, Oluwasomidoyin O Bello, Ijeoma A Meka, Chukwuemeka V Okwor, Chukwuemelie Z Uche, Chiebonam E Nwajiobi, Uloaku A Nto-Ezimah, Chisom E Uchechukwu, Ekene J Arum
{"title":"Assessment of brain natriuretic peptide and copeptin as correlates of blood pressure in chronic hypertensive pregnant women.","authors":"Chika J Okwor, Kayode S Adedapo, Oluwasomidoyin O Bello, Ijeoma A Meka, Chukwuemeka V Okwor, Chukwuemelie Z Uche, Chiebonam E Nwajiobi, Uloaku A Nto-Ezimah, Chisom E Uchechukwu, Ekene J Arum","doi":"10.1186/s40885-022-00221-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy including preexisting (or chronic) hypertension are the most common complication encountered during pregnancy that contribute significantly to maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and copeptin have been investigated as biomarkers in various hypertensive disorders, but studies of their clinical value in chronic hypertensive pregnant women are sparce. This study aimed to assess the levels of BNP and copeptin in chronic hypertensive pregnant women and investigate their correlation with blood pressure (BP) in chronic hypertensive pregnant women in South Western Nigeria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred and sixty consenting pregnant women in their third trimester of pregnancy, grouped into those with chronic hypertension (n = 80) and normotensive (n = 80), were recruited for this cross-sectional study. Age and clinical characteristics were obtained, and blood was aseptically drawn for BNP and copeptin measurement using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Data was analyzed with IBM SPSS ver. 20.0. Data was analyzed using Student t-test, chi-square, and Pearson correlation test as appropriate. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) were significantly higher in pregnant women with chronic hypertension (158.30 ± 3.51 and 105.08 ± 2.47 mmHg, respectively) compared with normotensive pregnant women (100.72 ± 3.02 and 70.29 ± 1.96 mmHg, respectively). The mean levels of BNP and copeptin were higher in pregnant women with chronic hypertension (57.26 ± 3.65 pg/mL and 12.44 ± 1.02 pmol/L, respectively) compared with normotensive pregnant women (49.85 ± 2.44 pg/mL and 10.25 ± 1.50 pmol/L, respectively) though not statistically significant. Correlations observed between SBP and DBP with levels of BNP (r = 0.204, P = 0.200; r = 0.142, P = 0.478) and copeptin (r = - 0.058, P = 0.288; r = 0.045, P = 0.907) were not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no association between BP and the levels of BNP and copeptin in pregnant women with chronic hypertension who were already on antihypertensive treatment, with the implication that antihypertensive treatment may modulate BNP and copeptin release despite significantly elevated BP levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":10480,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Hypertension","volume":"28 1","pages":"37"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9753280/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40885-022-00221-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy including preexisting (or chronic) hypertension are the most common complication encountered during pregnancy that contribute significantly to maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and copeptin have been investigated as biomarkers in various hypertensive disorders, but studies of their clinical value in chronic hypertensive pregnant women are sparce. This study aimed to assess the levels of BNP and copeptin in chronic hypertensive pregnant women and investigate their correlation with blood pressure (BP) in chronic hypertensive pregnant women in South Western Nigeria.

Methods: One hundred and sixty consenting pregnant women in their third trimester of pregnancy, grouped into those with chronic hypertension (n = 80) and normotensive (n = 80), were recruited for this cross-sectional study. Age and clinical characteristics were obtained, and blood was aseptically drawn for BNP and copeptin measurement using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Data was analyzed with IBM SPSS ver. 20.0. Data was analyzed using Student t-test, chi-square, and Pearson correlation test as appropriate. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results: The mean systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) were significantly higher in pregnant women with chronic hypertension (158.30 ± 3.51 and 105.08 ± 2.47 mmHg, respectively) compared with normotensive pregnant women (100.72 ± 3.02 and 70.29 ± 1.96 mmHg, respectively). The mean levels of BNP and copeptin were higher in pregnant women with chronic hypertension (57.26 ± 3.65 pg/mL and 12.44 ± 1.02 pmol/L, respectively) compared with normotensive pregnant women (49.85 ± 2.44 pg/mL and 10.25 ± 1.50 pmol/L, respectively) though not statistically significant. Correlations observed between SBP and DBP with levels of BNP (r = 0.204, P = 0.200; r = 0.142, P = 0.478) and copeptin (r = - 0.058, P = 0.288; r = 0.045, P = 0.907) were not statistically significant.

Conclusions: There was no association between BP and the levels of BNP and copeptin in pregnant women with chronic hypertension who were already on antihypertensive treatment, with the implication that antihypertensive treatment may modulate BNP and copeptin release despite significantly elevated BP levels.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估脑钠肽和 copeptin 与慢性高血压孕妇血压的相关性。
背景:妊娠期高血压疾病(包括原有(或慢性)高血压)是妊娠期最常见的并发症,对孕产妇和围产儿的发病率和死亡率有重大影响。脑钠肽 (BNP) 和 copeptin 已被研究作为各种高血压疾病的生物标志物,但对它们在慢性高血压孕妇中的临床价值的研究却很少。本研究旨在评估尼日利亚西南部慢性高血压孕妇的 BNP 和 copeptin 水平,并研究它们与慢性高血压孕妇血压(BP)的相关性:这项横断面研究招募了 160 名同意参加的怀孕三个月的孕妇,分为慢性高血压孕妇(80 人)和正常血压孕妇(80 人)。研究人员采集了孕妇的年龄和临床特征,并无菌抽血,使用酶联免疫吸附法测定 BNP 和 copeptin。数据分析采用 IBM SPSS ver.20.0.数据分析酌情采用学生 t 检验、卡方检验和皮尔逊相关检验。统计显著性设定为 P 结果:与血压正常的孕妇(分别为 100.72 ± 3.02 和 70.29 ± 1.96 mmHg)相比,慢性高血压孕妇的平均收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)明显升高(分别为 158.30 ± 3.51 和 105.08 ± 2.47 mmHg)。与血压正常的孕妇(分别为 49.85 ± 2.44 pg/mL 和 10.25 ± 1.50 pmol/L)相比,慢性高血压孕妇的 BNP 和 copeptin 平均水平更高(分别为 57.26 ± 3.65 pg/mL 和 12.44 ± 1.02 pmol/L),但无统计学意义。观察到的 SBP 和 DBP 与 BNP(r = 0.204,P = 0.200;r = 0.142,P = 0.478)和 copeptin(r = - 0.058,P = 0.288;r = 0.045,P = 0.907)水平之间的相关性无统计学意义:结论:在已接受降压治疗的慢性高血压孕妇中,血压与 BNP 和 copeptin 水平之间没有关联,这意味着尽管血压水平显著升高,降压治疗仍可调节 BNP 和 copeptin 的释放。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Hypertension
Clinical Hypertension PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
34
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Age and blood pressure stratified healthy vascular aging, organ damage and prognosis in the community-dwelling elderly: insights from the North Shanghai Study. Amlodipine increases risk of primary open-angle glaucoma. Association of aerobic and muscle-strengthening physical activity with chronic kidney disease in participants with hypertension. Cost-effectiveness of strengthening blood pressure classification in South Korea: comparing the 2017 ACC/AHA and KSH guidelines. Editorial: The 30-year journey of the clinical hypertension.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1