Treatment With Adalimumab 80 mg Every Other Week in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Results of Treatment Intensification in Clinical Practice.

IF 1.8 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Crohn's & Colitis 360 Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1093/crocol/otac051
Marta Calvo Moya, Yago González Lama, Belén Ruíz Antorán, Ignacio Omella Usieto, Ismael El Hajra Martinez, Elena Santos Pérez, Belén Menchén Viso, Virginia Matallana Royo, Irene González Partida, Rocío de Lucas Tellez de Meneses, Pablo Bella Castillo, Macarena González Rodriguez, María Isabel Vera Mendoza
{"title":"Treatment With Adalimumab 80 mg Every Other Week in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Results of Treatment Intensification in Clinical Practice.","authors":"Marta Calvo Moya,&nbsp;Yago González Lama,&nbsp;Belén Ruíz Antorán,&nbsp;Ignacio Omella Usieto,&nbsp;Ismael El Hajra Martinez,&nbsp;Elena Santos Pérez,&nbsp;Belén Menchén Viso,&nbsp;Virginia Matallana Royo,&nbsp;Irene González Partida,&nbsp;Rocío de Lucas Tellez de Meneses,&nbsp;Pablo Bella Castillo,&nbsp;Macarena González Rodriguez,&nbsp;María Isabel Vera Mendoza","doi":"10.1093/crocol/otac051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Loss of response to anti-tumor necrosis factor drugs in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is frequent and, in case of low drug levels, treatment intensification is recommended. In addition, in cases in which clinical response without attainment of remission (clinical, endoscopic, or radiological), intensification could be justified since higher drug levels are associated with better outcomes. For adalimumab (ADA), the standard intensification regimen is 40 mg every week (ew). Availability of ADA 80 mg prefilled pens has enabled every other week (eow) intensification. We assessed the clinical efficacy of intensification with ADA 80 mg eow.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Spain. Patients with IBD receiving maintenance ADA 80 mg eow with clinical, biomarker, and drug-level assessments were included. Demographics and clinical, biological, and endoscopic evaluation of the disease before and after ADA intensification, and pharmacokinetic assessments, were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-seven patients (72 Crohn's disease, 15 ulcerative colitis; average age 50 years) were included. Reasons for ADA intensification were: low ADA levels-<5 µg mL<sup>-1</sup>-(17%), low ADA levels-<5 µg mL<sup>-1</sup>-without clinical response (63%), clinical response without clinical remission (15%) and active disease on objective evaluation (including colonoscopy, magnetic resonance imaging, capsule endoscopy, and/or intestinal ultrasound; 5%). Following treatment intensification to ADA 80 mg eow, 75 patients (86%) were in clinical remission and 69 (79.3%) were in biologic remission (clinical remission and normalization of biomarkers). After a median follow-up of 19 months (interquartile range 13-25), 63 patients (72%) remained on treatment and in clinical remission. There were no serious infections, hospitalizations, or deaths. Drug costs did not increase with the 80 mg eow regimen versus a standard intensification regimen.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ADA intensification to 80 mg eow was safe, effective, and did not increase drug costs versus standard intensification to 40 mg ew in our experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":10847,"journal":{"name":"Crohn's & Colitis 360","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9922047/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crohn's & Colitis 360","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/crocol/otac051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Loss of response to anti-tumor necrosis factor drugs in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is frequent and, in case of low drug levels, treatment intensification is recommended. In addition, in cases in which clinical response without attainment of remission (clinical, endoscopic, or radiological), intensification could be justified since higher drug levels are associated with better outcomes. For adalimumab (ADA), the standard intensification regimen is 40 mg every week (ew). Availability of ADA 80 mg prefilled pens has enabled every other week (eow) intensification. We assessed the clinical efficacy of intensification with ADA 80 mg eow.

Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Spain. Patients with IBD receiving maintenance ADA 80 mg eow with clinical, biomarker, and drug-level assessments were included. Demographics and clinical, biological, and endoscopic evaluation of the disease before and after ADA intensification, and pharmacokinetic assessments, were collected.

Results: Eighty-seven patients (72 Crohn's disease, 15 ulcerative colitis; average age 50 years) were included. Reasons for ADA intensification were: low ADA levels-<5 µg mL-1-(17%), low ADA levels-<5 µg mL-1-without clinical response (63%), clinical response without clinical remission (15%) and active disease on objective evaluation (including colonoscopy, magnetic resonance imaging, capsule endoscopy, and/or intestinal ultrasound; 5%). Following treatment intensification to ADA 80 mg eow, 75 patients (86%) were in clinical remission and 69 (79.3%) were in biologic remission (clinical remission and normalization of biomarkers). After a median follow-up of 19 months (interquartile range 13-25), 63 patients (72%) remained on treatment and in clinical remission. There were no serious infections, hospitalizations, or deaths. Drug costs did not increase with the 80 mg eow regimen versus a standard intensification regimen.

Conclusions: ADA intensification to 80 mg eow was safe, effective, and did not increase drug costs versus standard intensification to 40 mg ew in our experience.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
每隔一周用阿达木单抗80mg治疗炎症性肠病:临床实践中治疗强化的结果
背景:炎症性肠病(IBD)患者对抗肿瘤坏死因子药物的反应丧失是常见的,在低药物水平的情况下,建议加强治疗。此外,在临床反应未达到缓解的情况下(临床、内窥镜或放射学),强化治疗是合理的,因为更高的药物水平与更好的结果相关。对于阿达木单抗(ADA),标准强化方案是每周40mg(新)。ADA 80mg预充笔的可用性已启用每隔一周(低)强化。我们评估了ADA 80mg强化治疗的临床疗效。方法:本回顾性研究在西班牙一家三级医院进行。IBD患者接受维持每日80mg ADA,并进行临床、生物标志物和药物水平评估。收集ADA强化前后疾病的人口统计学、临床、生物学和内镜评估,以及药代动力学评估。结果:87例患者(克罗恩病72例,溃疡性结肠炎15例;平均年龄50岁)。ADA强化的原因为:ADA低水平-1-(17%),ADA低水平-1-无临床反应(63%),临床反应无临床缓解(15%),客观评价(包括结肠镜检查、磁共振成像、胶囊内窥镜检查和/或肠道超声检查)疾病活动性;5%)。治疗强化至ADA 80mg /日剂量后,75例(86%)患者临床缓解,69例(79.3%)患者生物缓解(临床缓解和生物标志物正常化)。中位随访19个月(四分位数范围13-25)后,63名患者(72%)继续接受治疗并处于临床缓解期。没有严重感染、住院治疗或死亡。与标准强化方案相比,低剂量80mg方案的药物成本没有增加。结论:根据我们的经验,ADA强化至80mg / ew是安全有效的,与标准强化至40mg / ew相比不会增加药物成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Crohn's & Colitis 360
Crohn's & Colitis 360 Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Artificial Intelligence- and Physician-Interpreted Stool Image Characteristics Correlate With C-Reactive Protein Among Inpatients With Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Pilot Study. Clinical Course of Bio Naive Ulcerative Colitis Patients Five Years After Initiation of Adalimumab in a Nationwide Cohort. Treatment Pathways in Patients With Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis: Understanding the Road to Advanced Therapy. Patient-Related Factors Associated With Long-Term Outcomes After Successful Endoscopic Balloon Dilation For Crohn's Disease-Associated Ileo-Colic Strictures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Does Timing of Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis Matter in Patients With Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis and Orthotopic Liver Transplantation? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1