Two professors' experience with competency-based education

Jamie P. Monat, Thomas F. Gannon
{"title":"Two professors' experience with competency-based education","authors":"Jamie P. Monat,&nbsp;Thomas F. Gannon","doi":"10.1002/cbe2.1061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the autumn of 2015, to extend its leadership in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education and to reach a wider range of lifelong learners, Worcester Polytechnic Institute embarked upon a pilot program to assess the value of a competency-based education (CBE) pedagogy. The authors converted two graduate-level Systems Engineering courses to a CBE format and delivered them to students in late 2016 and 2017. Preliminary results suggest that CBE offers increased flexibility for working professionals and can extend the reach of educational institutions; that the choice of a learning management system is critical in facilitating CBE delivery; that some students adapt to a CBE format very well while others (who do not have good self-discipline) do not, so that identifying the correct target demographic is important; that working in project teams is difficult in a CBE context; that synchronous activities (such as Discussion Board postings requiring synchronous debate) are challenging; that (in the version of CBE offered) most students did not avail themselves of the substantial flexibility provided in selecting course topics and alternative assessments; and that unless incentivized to move quickly, students tend to procrastinate. Lastly, for CBE to be financially beneficial to both student and university, it is our opinion that careful attention must be paid to the choice of students, the selection of courses, and the choice of business model, all of which are intimately tied together. These preliminary observations must be corroborated or refuted in future pilots, which are currently planned to develop improved versions of CBE at Worcester Polytechnic Institute.</p>","PeriodicalId":101234,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Competency-Based Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/cbe2.1061","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Competency-Based Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cbe2.1061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

In the autumn of 2015, to extend its leadership in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education and to reach a wider range of lifelong learners, Worcester Polytechnic Institute embarked upon a pilot program to assess the value of a competency-based education (CBE) pedagogy. The authors converted two graduate-level Systems Engineering courses to a CBE format and delivered them to students in late 2016 and 2017. Preliminary results suggest that CBE offers increased flexibility for working professionals and can extend the reach of educational institutions; that the choice of a learning management system is critical in facilitating CBE delivery; that some students adapt to a CBE format very well while others (who do not have good self-discipline) do not, so that identifying the correct target demographic is important; that working in project teams is difficult in a CBE context; that synchronous activities (such as Discussion Board postings requiring synchronous debate) are challenging; that (in the version of CBE offered) most students did not avail themselves of the substantial flexibility provided in selecting course topics and alternative assessments; and that unless incentivized to move quickly, students tend to procrastinate. Lastly, for CBE to be financially beneficial to both student and university, it is our opinion that careful attention must be paid to the choice of students, the selection of courses, and the choice of business model, all of which are intimately tied together. These preliminary observations must be corroborated or refuted in future pilots, which are currently planned to develop improved versions of CBE at Worcester Polytechnic Institute.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两位教授的能力本位教育经验
2015年秋季,为了扩大伍斯特理工学院在科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)教育方面的领导地位,并吸引更广泛的终身学习者,伍斯特理工学院启动了一项试点计划,以评估能力为基础的教育(CBE)教学法的价值。作者将两门研究生水平的系统工程课程转换为CBE格式,并在2016年底和2017年向学生授课。初步结果表明,CBE为在职专业人员提供了更大的灵活性,并可以扩大教育机构的影响范围;选择一套学习管理系统,对促进本课程的推行至为重要;有些学生很好地适应了CBE的模式,而另一些(没有良好自律的人)则不能,因此确定正确的目标人群是很重要的;在CBE环境中,在项目团队中工作是困难的;同步活动(例如需要同步辩论的讨论板帖子)具有挑战性;(在提供的CBE版本中)大多数学生没有充分利用在选择课程主题和替代评估方面提供的很大灵活性;而且,除非激励学生迅速行动,否则他们往往会拖延。最后,为了使CBE在经济上对学生和大学都有利,我们认为必须仔细注意学生的选择,课程的选择和商业模式的选择,所有这些都是紧密联系在一起的。这些初步观察必须在未来的试点中得到证实或驳斥,目前计划在伍斯特理工学院开发改进版本的CBE。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Exploring secondary teachers' perspectives on implementing competency-based education The impact of student recognition of excellence to student outcome in a competency-based educational model Issue Information JCBE editorial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1