How US newspapers view the UK's NHS: a study in international lesson-drawing.

IF 1.3 4区 社会学 Q4 SOCIAL SCIENCES, BIOMEDICAL Social Theory & Health Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-04-25 DOI:10.1057/s41285-021-00162-4
Sean Tunney, Jane Thomas, Adam Cox
{"title":"How US newspapers view the UK's NHS: a study in international lesson-drawing.","authors":"Sean Tunney, Jane Thomas, Adam Cox","doi":"10.1057/s41285-021-00162-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Healthcare on both sides of the Atlantic is a highly charged political and economic subject. This work considers US media coverage of the UK's National Health Service (NHS), an under-researched area. We assess the framing of the NHS in editorials, opinion and feature articles during the time of the Obama administration to show how media can perform the role of lesson-drawing, a theory adopted from public policy research. The study also applies the notion of journalistic habitus in this context. Using these ideas, we address a hypothesis which holds that US coverage is framed around the flaws of the UK's NHS. The paper considers how intermedia editorial and news values operate, with commentators drawing a range of negative lessons in both the Democrat- and Republican-supporting press. We find that the NHS was often posited as a flawed international variant of the single-payer model, where newspapers employed an ahistoric explanation of failure and decline.</p>","PeriodicalId":46551,"journal":{"name":"Social Theory & Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8068779/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Theory & Health","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41285-021-00162-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/4/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Healthcare on both sides of the Atlantic is a highly charged political and economic subject. This work considers US media coverage of the UK's National Health Service (NHS), an under-researched area. We assess the framing of the NHS in editorials, opinion and feature articles during the time of the Obama administration to show how media can perform the role of lesson-drawing, a theory adopted from public policy research. The study also applies the notion of journalistic habitus in this context. Using these ideas, we address a hypothesis which holds that US coverage is framed around the flaws of the UK's NHS. The paper considers how intermedia editorial and news values operate, with commentators drawing a range of negative lessons in both the Democrat- and Republican-supporting press. We find that the NHS was often posited as a flawed international variant of the single-payer model, where newspapers employed an ahistoric explanation of failure and decline.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国报纸如何看待英国国家医疗服务体系:国际经验借鉴研究。
大西洋两岸的医疗保健是一个高度敏感的政治和经济话题。本作品探讨了美国媒体对英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)的报道,这是一个研究不足的领域。我们评估了奥巴马政府执政期间社论、观点和特写文章中对国民医疗服务体系的描述,以说明媒体如何扮演 "总结经验教训 "的角色,这是公共政策研究中采用的一种理论。本研究还在此背景下应用了新闻惯习的概念。利用这些观点,我们探讨了一个假设,即美国的报道是围绕英国国家医疗服务体系的缺陷展开的。本文探讨了媒体间的社论和新闻价值观是如何运作的,评论员从支持民主党和共和党的媒体中吸取了一系列负面教训。我们发现,英国国家医疗服务体系通常被假定为单一支付模式的一个有缺陷的国际变种,报纸采用了一种非历史性的解释来说明其失败和衰落。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Theory & Health
Social Theory & Health SOCIAL SCIENCES, BIOMEDICAL-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Social Theory & Health provides an international scholarly forum for theoretical reflection and debate on contemporary health issues, many of which bear directly on the planning and delivery of services. The journal aims to consolidate, refine and extend theoretically informed work on the role of health in modern societies. Interest in issues of theory and health now informs many academic and practice-oriented disciplines and crosses discipline boundaries. The Editors encourage contributions from all relevant disciplines, as well as from those involved directly in front-line treatment and care. Contributions from the developing world are particularly welcome. The journal aims to include contributions from all theoretical perspectives.
期刊最新文献
Populism, moral foundations, and vaccine hesitancy during COVID-19 Habits and the socioeconomic patterning of health-related behaviour: a pragmatist perspective Inequity in palliative care: class and active ageing when dying Correction to: Postcolonial riskscapes: risk, trust, and the community-based response to Ebola virus disease in Liberia Negotiating body and power in forensic mental health care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1