Students' perception of problem-based learning at a Japanese medical school: an exploratory sequential mixed method.

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES International Journal of Medical Education Pub Date : 2022-12-26 DOI:10.5116/ijme.6399.dee1
Htain Lin-Aung, Daisuke Masumoto, Zayar Linn, Yusuke Kobayakawa, Satoshi Okamura, Kosuke Kurihara, Kunimasa Morio, Yasura Tashiro, Hiroyuki Sakurai, Hiroki Hori
{"title":"Students' perception of problem-based learning at a Japanese medical school: an exploratory sequential mixed method.","authors":"Htain Lin-Aung,&nbsp;Daisuke Masumoto,&nbsp;Zayar Linn,&nbsp;Yusuke Kobayakawa,&nbsp;Satoshi Okamura,&nbsp;Kosuke Kurihara,&nbsp;Kunimasa Morio,&nbsp;Yasura Tashiro,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Sakurai,&nbsp;Hiroki Hori","doi":"10.5116/ijme.6399.dee1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to assess the perception of PBL among Japanese medical students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Learning effects and challenges of PBL from the students' viewpoint were assessed with an exploratory sequential mixed method. Focus group discussions followed by thematic analysis were conducted with 27 students and residents. Then a questionnaire survey was carried out. A total of 119 out of 258 students (46.1%) responded. The results from 24 questions were analyzed with a residual analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thematic analysis extracted 14 themes from four discussion topics. The participants in focus group discussion regarded the PBL program as a better learning method than lectures. But some key phrases on the challenge of social interaction, including reluctance to actively discuss and collaborate with unfamiliar peers, were found. The questionnaire survey revealed a significantly lower adjusted standardized residual (ASR) for the positive response in five of six questions in the category of social interaction; improvement of communication skills (ASR = -3.303, n = 118, p < .001), enhancement of responsibility at group discussions (ASR = -2.078, n = 119, p = .038), building social networking (ASR = -3.006, n = 119, p = .003), becoming to sympathize with patients (ASR = -2.449, n = 119, p = .014) and understanding social aspects of clinical practice (ASR = -5.790, n = 119, p < .001). Conclusion: The Japanese medical students perceived PBL as an effective learning strategy. However, they had a problem with social interactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":14029,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Education","volume":"13 ","pages":"322-334"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9911279/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.6399.dee1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the perception of PBL among Japanese medical students.

Methods: Learning effects and challenges of PBL from the students' viewpoint were assessed with an exploratory sequential mixed method. Focus group discussions followed by thematic analysis were conducted with 27 students and residents. Then a questionnaire survey was carried out. A total of 119 out of 258 students (46.1%) responded. The results from 24 questions were analyzed with a residual analysis.

Results: Thematic analysis extracted 14 themes from four discussion topics. The participants in focus group discussion regarded the PBL program as a better learning method than lectures. But some key phrases on the challenge of social interaction, including reluctance to actively discuss and collaborate with unfamiliar peers, were found. The questionnaire survey revealed a significantly lower adjusted standardized residual (ASR) for the positive response in five of six questions in the category of social interaction; improvement of communication skills (ASR = -3.303, n = 118, p < .001), enhancement of responsibility at group discussions (ASR = -2.078, n = 119, p = .038), building social networking (ASR = -3.006, n = 119, p = .003), becoming to sympathize with patients (ASR = -2.449, n = 119, p = .014) and understanding social aspects of clinical practice (ASR = -5.790, n = 119, p < .001). Conclusion: The Japanese medical students perceived PBL as an effective learning strategy. However, they had a problem with social interactions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日本医学院学生对基于问题的学习的认知:一种探索性顺序混合方法。
目的:本研究旨在评估日本医学生对PBL的认知。方法:采用探索性顺序混合方法,从学生的角度评估PBL的学习效果和挑战。对27名学生和住院医生进行焦点小组讨论,然后进行专题分析。然后进行问卷调查。258名学生中有119名(46.1%)回答了问题。对24个问题的结果进行残差分析。结果:主题分析从4个讨论话题中提取了14个主题。焦点小组讨论的参与者认为PBL项目是比讲课更好的学习方法。但我们发现了一些关于社交挑战的关键短语,包括不愿与不熟悉的同龄人积极讨论和合作。问卷调查结果显示,在社会交往类别的6个问题中,有5个问题的积极回答显著降低了调整后的标准化残差(ASR);改善沟通技巧(ASR = -3.303, n = 118, p < 0.001),增强小组讨论的责任感(ASR = -2.078, n = 119, p = 0.038),建立社交网络(ASR = -3.006, n = 119, p = 0.003),变得同情患者(ASR = -2.449, n = 119, p = 0.014),理解临床实践的社会方面(ASR = -5.790, n = 119, p < 0.001)。结论:日本医学生认为PBL是一种有效的学习策略。然而,他们在社交方面有问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Medical Education
International Journal of Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
Evaluating an e-learning course's impact and challenges on genomic literacy among medical professionals. How do mentors perceive and perform their role in a reflection-based mentoring programme for medical students? Enhancing the learning experience by empowering medical students to co-create learning tools and classroom activities. Profiles of intercultural sensitivity of healthcare students: a person-centred approach. Effectively supporting widening participation learners in medical education through a capability approach lens.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1