Htain Lin-Aung, Daisuke Masumoto, Zayar Linn, Yusuke Kobayakawa, Satoshi Okamura, Kosuke Kurihara, Kunimasa Morio, Yasura Tashiro, Hiroyuki Sakurai, Hiroki Hori
{"title":"Students' perception of problem-based learning at a Japanese medical school: an exploratory sequential mixed method.","authors":"Htain Lin-Aung, Daisuke Masumoto, Zayar Linn, Yusuke Kobayakawa, Satoshi Okamura, Kosuke Kurihara, Kunimasa Morio, Yasura Tashiro, Hiroyuki Sakurai, Hiroki Hori","doi":"10.5116/ijme.6399.dee1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to assess the perception of PBL among Japanese medical students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Learning effects and challenges of PBL from the students' viewpoint were assessed with an exploratory sequential mixed method. Focus group discussions followed by thematic analysis were conducted with 27 students and residents. Then a questionnaire survey was carried out. A total of 119 out of 258 students (46.1%) responded. The results from 24 questions were analyzed with a residual analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thematic analysis extracted 14 themes from four discussion topics. The participants in focus group discussion regarded the PBL program as a better learning method than lectures. But some key phrases on the challenge of social interaction, including reluctance to actively discuss and collaborate with unfamiliar peers, were found. The questionnaire survey revealed a significantly lower adjusted standardized residual (ASR) for the positive response in five of six questions in the category of social interaction; improvement of communication skills (ASR = -3.303, n = 118, p < .001), enhancement of responsibility at group discussions (ASR = -2.078, n = 119, p = .038), building social networking (ASR = -3.006, n = 119, p = .003), becoming to sympathize with patients (ASR = -2.449, n = 119, p = .014) and understanding social aspects of clinical practice (ASR = -5.790, n = 119, p < .001). Conclusion: The Japanese medical students perceived PBL as an effective learning strategy. However, they had a problem with social interactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":14029,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Education","volume":"13 ","pages":"322-334"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9911279/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.6399.dee1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to assess the perception of PBL among Japanese medical students.
Methods: Learning effects and challenges of PBL from the students' viewpoint were assessed with an exploratory sequential mixed method. Focus group discussions followed by thematic analysis were conducted with 27 students and residents. Then a questionnaire survey was carried out. A total of 119 out of 258 students (46.1%) responded. The results from 24 questions were analyzed with a residual analysis.
Results: Thematic analysis extracted 14 themes from four discussion topics. The participants in focus group discussion regarded the PBL program as a better learning method than lectures. But some key phrases on the challenge of social interaction, including reluctance to actively discuss and collaborate with unfamiliar peers, were found. The questionnaire survey revealed a significantly lower adjusted standardized residual (ASR) for the positive response in five of six questions in the category of social interaction; improvement of communication skills (ASR = -3.303, n = 118, p < .001), enhancement of responsibility at group discussions (ASR = -2.078, n = 119, p = .038), building social networking (ASR = -3.006, n = 119, p = .003), becoming to sympathize with patients (ASR = -2.449, n = 119, p = .014) and understanding social aspects of clinical practice (ASR = -5.790, n = 119, p < .001). Conclusion: The Japanese medical students perceived PBL as an effective learning strategy. However, they had a problem with social interactions.
目的:本研究旨在评估日本医学生对PBL的认知。方法:采用探索性顺序混合方法,从学生的角度评估PBL的学习效果和挑战。对27名学生和住院医生进行焦点小组讨论,然后进行专题分析。然后进行问卷调查。258名学生中有119名(46.1%)回答了问题。对24个问题的结果进行残差分析。结果:主题分析从4个讨论话题中提取了14个主题。焦点小组讨论的参与者认为PBL项目是比讲课更好的学习方法。但我们发现了一些关于社交挑战的关键短语,包括不愿与不熟悉的同龄人积极讨论和合作。问卷调查结果显示,在社会交往类别的6个问题中,有5个问题的积极回答显著降低了调整后的标准化残差(ASR);改善沟通技巧(ASR = -3.303, n = 118, p < 0.001),增强小组讨论的责任感(ASR = -2.078, n = 119, p = 0.038),建立社交网络(ASR = -3.006, n = 119, p = 0.003),变得同情患者(ASR = -2.449, n = 119, p = 0.014),理解临床实践的社会方面(ASR = -5.790, n = 119, p < 0.001)。结论:日本医学生认为PBL是一种有效的学习策略。然而,他们在社交方面有问题。