'Without support CALD patients will be left behind': A mixed-methods exploration of culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) client perspectives of telehealth and those of their healthcare providers.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-16 DOI:10.1177/1357633X231154943
Bernadette Brady, Golsa Saberi, Yvonne Santalucia, Paul Gorgees, Tran Thao Nguyen, Hien Le, Balwinder Sidhu
{"title":"'<i>Without support CALD patients will be left behind</i>': A mixed-methods exploration of culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) client perspectives of telehealth and those of their healthcare providers.","authors":"Bernadette Brady, Golsa Saberi, Yvonne Santalucia, Paul Gorgees, Tran Thao Nguyen, Hien Le, Balwinder Sidhu","doi":"10.1177/1357633X231154943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The rapid adoption of telehealth during the global pandemic has the potential to widen disparities for culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) consumers. We explored the perspectives and experiences of CALD consumers accessing telehealth during the global pandemic and those of their healthcare providers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multistakeholder mixed-methods study involving two parallel samples comprising consumer-participants (<i>n</i> = 56) and healthcare provider-participants (<i>n</i> = 81). Multicultural consumer-participants, recruited from consecutive referrals to Health Language Services for telehealth support, were assisted to complete two surveys (before and after their clinical telehealth appointment) in their preferred language. A purposive sample of consumer-participants was interviewed to understand their perceived barriers and enablers of successful telehealth consultations. Simultaneously, all healthcare providers within the local health district were eligible to participate in an online survey if they had provided telehealth care to a consumer during the recruitment period. Closed-ended responses were descriptively summarised, while open-ended responses and interview transcripts were analysed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite 86% of consumer-participants inexperienced with telehealth, 80% achieved a successful appointment with a healthcare provider. Consumer perceptions were shaped by cultural and diagnostic concepts of legitimacy, in the context of known accessibility and technology literacy challenges. Healthcare provider perspectives were less favourable towards telehealth, with equity of healthcare delivery a major concern.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our findings highlight unintended consequences arising from a rapid transition to telehealth. Adopting collaborative approaches to the design and implementation of telehealth is imperative to mitigate health inequities faced by CALD communities and maximise their opportunity to realise potential health benefits associated with telehealth.</p>","PeriodicalId":50024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","volume":" ","pages":"1493-1506"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X231154943","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The rapid adoption of telehealth during the global pandemic has the potential to widen disparities for culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) consumers. We explored the perspectives and experiences of CALD consumers accessing telehealth during the global pandemic and those of their healthcare providers.

Methods: A multistakeholder mixed-methods study involving two parallel samples comprising consumer-participants (n = 56) and healthcare provider-participants (n = 81). Multicultural consumer-participants, recruited from consecutive referrals to Health Language Services for telehealth support, were assisted to complete two surveys (before and after their clinical telehealth appointment) in their preferred language. A purposive sample of consumer-participants was interviewed to understand their perceived barriers and enablers of successful telehealth consultations. Simultaneously, all healthcare providers within the local health district were eligible to participate in an online survey if they had provided telehealth care to a consumer during the recruitment period. Closed-ended responses were descriptively summarised, while open-ended responses and interview transcripts were analysed thematically.

Results: Despite 86% of consumer-participants inexperienced with telehealth, 80% achieved a successful appointment with a healthcare provider. Consumer perceptions were shaped by cultural and diagnostic concepts of legitimacy, in the context of known accessibility and technology literacy challenges. Healthcare provider perspectives were less favourable towards telehealth, with equity of healthcare delivery a major concern.

Discussion: Our findings highlight unintended consequences arising from a rapid transition to telehealth. Adopting collaborative approaches to the design and implementation of telehealth is imperative to mitigate health inequities faced by CALD communities and maximise their opportunity to realise potential health benefits associated with telehealth.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
没有支持,CALD 患者将被抛在后面":对文化和语言多样性 (CALD) 客户及其医疗服务提供者对远程医疗的看法进行混合方法探索。
导言:在全球大流行期间,远程医疗的快速应用有可能扩大文化和语言多样性(CALD)消费者的差异。我们探讨了在全球大流行期间使用远程医疗的文化和语言多样性消费者及其医疗服务提供者的观点和经验:多方参与的混合方法研究涉及两个平行样本,包括消费者参与者(n = 56)和医疗服务提供者参与者(n = 81)。多元文化消费者参与者是从连续转诊到健康语言服务机构寻求远程保健支持的患者中招募的,在他们的协助下,他们用自己喜欢的语言完成了两份调查(在临床远程保健预约之前和之后)。我们对消费者参与者进行了有目的的抽样访谈,以了解他们对成功进行远程保健咨询的障碍和促进因素的看法。同时,当地卫生区的所有医疗服务提供者,如果在招募期间为消费者提供过远程医疗服务,都有资格参与在线调查。对封闭式回答进行了描述性总结,对开放式回答和访谈记录进行了专题分析:结果:尽管 86% 的消费者参与者没有远程医疗经验,但 80% 的人成功预约了医疗服务提供者。在已知的可及性和技术扫盲挑战的背景下,消费者的看法受文化和诊断合法性概念的影响。医疗服务提供者对远程医疗的看法则不太乐观,他们主要关注的是医疗服务的公平性:讨论:我们的研究结果突显了向远程医疗快速过渡所带来的意外后果。采用合作的方式来设计和实施远程医疗势在必行,这样才能减轻 CALD 社区面临的医疗不平等,并最大限度地利用远程医疗带来的潜在健康益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare provides excellent peer reviewed coverage of developments in telemedicine and e-health and is now widely recognised as the leading journal in its field. Contributions from around the world provide a unique perspective on how different countries and health systems are using new technology in health care. Sections within the journal include technology updates, editorials, original articles, research tutorials, educational material, review articles and reports from various telemedicine organisations. A subscription to this journal will help you to stay up-to-date in this fast moving and growing area of medicine.
期刊最新文献
Satisfaction with videoconference-delivered CBT provided as part of a blended treatment approach for children and adolescents with mental disorders and their families during the COVID-19 pandemic: A follow-up survey among caregivers and therapists. Ear Portal: An urban-based ear, nose, and throat, and audiology referral telehealth portal to improve access to specialist ear health services for children. The Congenital Cardiology Cloud: Proof of feasibility of Germany's first tele-medical network for pediatric cardiology. Care trajectories for patients utilizing electronic visits for COVID-like symptoms in a large healthcare delivery system: May 2020-December 2021. Knowledge, perceptions, and readiness of telepharmacy (KPR-TP) questionnaire among pharmacists: Development and psychometric evaluation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1