Development and evaluation of a patient decision aid for pediatric interval appendectomy.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PEDIATRICS World Journal of Pediatric Surgery Pub Date : 2022-11-08 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1136/wjps-2022-000466
Victoria Larocca, Irina Oltean, Viviane Grandpierre, Ahmed Nasr
{"title":"Development and evaluation of a patient decision aid for pediatric interval appendectomy.","authors":"Victoria Larocca, Irina Oltean, Viviane Grandpierre, Ahmed Nasr","doi":"10.1136/wjps-2022-000466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>One option for the treatment of perforated appendicitis in pediatric patients is interval appendectomy (IA). A patient decision aid (PDA) can be useful in the decision-making process regarding IA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate parents' decisional conflict before and after engaging with a developed PDA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants included (a) parents who are considering IA surgery for their child, (b) have not yet had their follow-up appointment postdischarge, and (c) were fluent in either the official languages of English or French. This study used a pretest and post-test design to measure participants' decisional conflict and treatment option choice. Perceptions and acceptability of the PDA were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 18 participants completed the study (16 mothers). Major findings include significant decreases in all Decisional Conflict Scale items from pre-PDA to post-PDA engagement, except for one item. The majority of participants perceived the PDA to be useful, easy to find information regarding risks and provided enough information to help them make a decision regarding their child's treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first study to develop and evaluate a PDA among parents who are making a decision regarding IA surgery. The results showed a significant decrease in decisional conflict after using the PDA. The results also showed that the PDA was generally accepted among parents and had positive perceptions regarding length, content, and balance. The use of PDA for this population can help ease feelings of decisional conflict and equip parents with the information to make informed decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":23823,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Pediatric Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/7b/0a/wjps-2022-000466.PMC9716827.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Pediatric Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/wjps-2022-000466","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: One option for the treatment of perforated appendicitis in pediatric patients is interval appendectomy (IA). A patient decision aid (PDA) can be useful in the decision-making process regarding IA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate parents' decisional conflict before and after engaging with a developed PDA.

Methods: Participants included (a) parents who are considering IA surgery for their child, (b) have not yet had their follow-up appointment postdischarge, and (c) were fluent in either the official languages of English or French. This study used a pretest and post-test design to measure participants' decisional conflict and treatment option choice. Perceptions and acceptability of the PDA were also assessed.

Results: A total of 18 participants completed the study (16 mothers). Major findings include significant decreases in all Decisional Conflict Scale items from pre-PDA to post-PDA engagement, except for one item. The majority of participants perceived the PDA to be useful, easy to find information regarding risks and provided enough information to help them make a decision regarding their child's treatment.

Conclusions: This is the first study to develop and evaluate a PDA among parents who are making a decision regarding IA surgery. The results showed a significant decrease in decisional conflict after using the PDA. The results also showed that the PDA was generally accepted among parents and had positive perceptions regarding length, content, and balance. The use of PDA for this population can help ease feelings of decisional conflict and equip parents with the information to make informed decisions.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发和评估儿科间隔阑尾切除术的患者决策辅助工具。
目的:治疗小儿穿孔性阑尾炎的一种方法是间歇性阑尾切除术(IA)。患者决策辅助工具(PDA)在有关 IA 的决策过程中非常有用。本研究旨在评估家长在使用已开发的 PDA 前后的决策冲突:方法:参与者包括(a)正在考虑为其子女进行 IA 手术的父母;(b)出院后尚未进行复诊的父母;(c)能流利使用官方语言英语或法语的父母。本研究采用了前测和后测的设计来测量参与者的决策冲突和治疗方案选择。此外,还对 PDA 的认知度和可接受性进行了评估:共有 18 人完成了研究(其中 16 人为母亲)。主要研究结果包括:除一个项目外,所有 "决策冲突量表 "项目从使用掌上电脑前到使用掌上电脑后均明显减少。大多数参与者认为 PDA 很有用,很容易找到有关风险的信息,并提供了足够的信息来帮助她们就孩子的治疗做出决定:这是第一项针对正在决定是否进行内科手术的家长开发和评估 PDA 的研究。结果显示,使用 PDA 后,决策冲突明显减少。结果还显示,家长普遍接受 PDA,并对其长度、内容和平衡性有积极的看法。对这一人群使用 PDA 有助于缓解决策冲突感,并让家长获得做出明智决定所需的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
38
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Prenatal diagnosis and risk stratification of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis: a comprehensive review. Numerical modeling assisting in surgical treatment of total anomalous pulmonary venous connection in children. Long-term outcomes and quality of life in patients with Hirschsprung disease. Controversies in Hirschsprung surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1