Translation and validation of the Work-Related Quality of Life Scale (WRQoLS-2) in a nursing cohort.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Contemporary Nurse Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.1080/10376178.2022.2147849
Ping Li, Yutao Wang, Min Zhang
{"title":"Translation and validation of the Work-Related Quality of Life Scale (WRQoLS-2) in a nursing cohort.","authors":"Ping Li,&nbsp;Yutao Wang,&nbsp;Min Zhang","doi":"10.1080/10376178.2022.2147849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to translate the Work-Related Quality of Life Scale (WRQoLS-2) into Chinese and validate the capacity of the tool to effectively measure this concept in a cohort of nursing professionals from mainland China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Chinese version of the WRQoLS-2 (WRQoLS-2C) was developed using forward and backward language translation. In total, 639 nurses were invited to complete the WRQoLS-2C. Two weeks later, 79 (12.4%) nurses were retested. Construct validity was analysed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (EFA, CFA). Cronbach's α and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to assess internal consistency, reliability and test-retest reliability. Correlation between the WRQoLS-2C and the Quality of Nursing Work Life scale (QNWL) total score was used to assess criterion-relation validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A seven-factor structure was revealed and confirmed using EFA (explaining 70.3% of the variance) and CFA (χ<sup>2 </sup>= 680.39, df = 413, χ<sup>2</sup>/df = 1.65, <i>p </i>< 0.001). The goodness-of-fit index was 0.88, and adjusted goodness-of-fit index 0.86 indicating a reliable model. The internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.94) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.84) of the WRQoLS-2C were high. The correlation coefficient between the WRQoLS-2C and QNWL total scores was 0.79 (<i>p </i>< 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The WRQoLS-2C was a reliable and valid instrument that can be used to assess WRQoL in the mainland China nursing profession.</p><p><strong>Impact statement: </strong>There are few options available to assess work related quality of life in Chinese language. This study has confirmed that the WRQoLs-2C is an effective instrument to measure this concept in nurses from mainland China.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary (pls): </strong>Work related quality of life is an important predictor of workplace turnover intension. Managers can take measures to improve work related quality of life and reduce employee attrition. There are very few tools to measure work related quality of life and fewer in Chinese language. We translated the WRQoLS-2 into Chinese according to Brislin's translation model, following cross-cultural adaption guidelines, and verified its reliability and validity in a cohort of mainland Chinese nurses. The translated instrument has good reliability and validity in nurses, but has not yet been verified in other occupational groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":55633,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Nurse","volume":"58 5-6","pages":"435-445"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Nurse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10376178.2022.2147849","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to translate the Work-Related Quality of Life Scale (WRQoLS-2) into Chinese and validate the capacity of the tool to effectively measure this concept in a cohort of nursing professionals from mainland China.

Methods: The Chinese version of the WRQoLS-2 (WRQoLS-2C) was developed using forward and backward language translation. In total, 639 nurses were invited to complete the WRQoLS-2C. Two weeks later, 79 (12.4%) nurses were retested. Construct validity was analysed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (EFA, CFA). Cronbach's α and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to assess internal consistency, reliability and test-retest reliability. Correlation between the WRQoLS-2C and the Quality of Nursing Work Life scale (QNWL) total score was used to assess criterion-relation validity.

Results: A seven-factor structure was revealed and confirmed using EFA (explaining 70.3% of the variance) and CFA (χ2 = 680.39, df = 413, χ2/df = 1.65, p < 0.001). The goodness-of-fit index was 0.88, and adjusted goodness-of-fit index 0.86 indicating a reliable model. The internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.94) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.84) of the WRQoLS-2C were high. The correlation coefficient between the WRQoLS-2C and QNWL total scores was 0.79 (p < 0.01).

Conclusion: The WRQoLS-2C was a reliable and valid instrument that can be used to assess WRQoL in the mainland China nursing profession.

Impact statement: There are few options available to assess work related quality of life in Chinese language. This study has confirmed that the WRQoLs-2C is an effective instrument to measure this concept in nurses from mainland China.

Plain language summary (pls): Work related quality of life is an important predictor of workplace turnover intension. Managers can take measures to improve work related quality of life and reduce employee attrition. There are very few tools to measure work related quality of life and fewer in Chinese language. We translated the WRQoLS-2 into Chinese according to Brislin's translation model, following cross-cultural adaption guidelines, and verified its reliability and validity in a cohort of mainland Chinese nurses. The translated instrument has good reliability and validity in nurses, but has not yet been verified in other occupational groups.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护理队列中工作相关生活质量量表(WRQoLS-2)的翻译与验证。
目的:本研究的目的是将工作相关生活质量量表(WRQoLS-2)翻译成中文,并验证该工具在中国大陆护理专业人员队列中有效测量这一概念的能力。方法:采用前向翻译和后向翻译的方法编制WRQoLS-2 (WRQoLS-2C)中文版。共邀请639名护士完成WRQoLS-2C。2周后复查79名(12.4%)护士。采用探索性因子分析和验证性因子分析(EFA, CFA)分析结构效度。采用Cronbach’s α和类内相关系数(intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC)评估内部一致性、信度和重测信度。采用WRQoLS-2C与护理工作生活质量量表(QNWL)总分的相关性评价标准关系效度。结果:EFA(解释70.3%的方差)和CFA (χ2 = 680.39, df = 413, χ2/df = 1.65, p p)证实了WRQoLS-2C是一种可靠、有效的评估中国大陆护理行业WRQoL的工具。影响陈述:用中文评估工作相关生活质量的选项很少。本研究证实了WRQoLs-2C是衡量中国大陆护士这种观念的有效工具。简单的语言总结(pls):工作相关生活质量是工作场所离职强度的重要预测因子。管理者可以采取措施提高与工作相关的生活质量,减少员工流失。衡量与工作相关的生活质量的工具很少,中文的工具更少。我们根据Brislin的翻译模型,遵循跨文化适应准则,将WRQoLS-2翻译成中文,并在中国大陆护士队列中验证其信度和效度。翻译后的量表在护士群体中具有良好的信度和效度,但在其他职业群体中尚未得到验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Contemporary Nurse
Contemporary Nurse 医学-护理
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
38
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Contemporary Nurse is an international peer-reviewed journal designed to increase nursing skills, knowledge and communication, assist in professional development and to enhance educational standards by publishing stimulating, informative and useful articles on a range of issues influencing professional nursing research, teaching and practice. Contemporary Nurse is a forum for nursing educators, researchers and professionals who require high-quality, peer-reviewed research on emerging research fronts, perspectives and protocols, community and family health, cross-cultural research, recruitment, retention, education, training and practitioner perspectives. Contemporary Nurse publishes original research articles, reviews and discussion papers.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing job satisfaction among advanced nurse practitioners: insights and reflections from Taiwan Special Issue: Advances in Frailty Science Special Issue: Quality Improvement Developing nursing interventions in Paediatric Emergence Delirium: a scoping review Integrating technology in aged care: challenges, opportunities, and a nursing lens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1