Sedation for Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Elderly Patients - the Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion. A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Trial.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Pub Date : 2022-12-17 DOI:10.15403/jgld-4506
Caius Mihai Breazu, Alexandru Leonard Alexa, Oana Urs, Voicu Mercea, Marcel Tantau, Adrian Bartos, Lidia Ciobanu, Daniela Ionescu
{"title":"Sedation for Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Elderly Patients - the Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion. A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Trial.","authors":"Caius Mihai Breazu,&nbsp;Alexandru Leonard Alexa,&nbsp;Oana Urs,&nbsp;Voicu Mercea,&nbsp;Marcel Tantau,&nbsp;Adrian Bartos,&nbsp;Lidia Ciobanu,&nbsp;Daniela Ionescu","doi":"10.15403/jgld-4506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sedation of elderly patients with associated comorbidities, subjected to ERCP procedure, can produce serious complications including respiratory instability and hemodynamics caused by the administration of anesthetic substances. In this study we aimed to evaluate whether the administration of lidocaine in continuous infusion during ERCP procedure reduces the consumption of propofol and the rate of complications in these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>83 patients over 65-year old, ASA II-IV score, undergoing an ERCP procedure were randomized in two groups: lidocaine group (group L) who received 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine 1% and propofol 1mg/kg at induction and then 2 mg/kg lidocaine 1% in continuous infusion during the procedure and control group (group C) who received saline in the same amount as group L and propofol 1mg/kg. The consumption of propofol, intraprocedural complications, the time of awakening and recovery, the quality of postprocedural analgesia, the satisfaction of the endoscopist were registered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Propofol consumption was statistically significantly lower in group L compared to group C [135.37 (±43.23) vs. 214.88 (±51.83), p=0.001]. The same result was obtained related to the awakening time [2.85 (±1.50) vs. 5.38 (±1.36), p=0.001] and recovery time [23.90 (±12.66) vs. 26.17 (±12.41), p<0.001], the episodes of intraprocedural desaturation (p=0.001), the involuntary intraprocedural movements (p=0.001), the endoscopist's satisfaction (p=0.006). No differences were found in terms of post-procedure pain scores (p=0.54).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lidocaine can be administered to reduce the need for propofol, faster awakening and lower intraprocedural complications in elderly patients undergoing the ERCP procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":50189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15403/jgld-4506","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sedation of elderly patients with associated comorbidities, subjected to ERCP procedure, can produce serious complications including respiratory instability and hemodynamics caused by the administration of anesthetic substances. In this study we aimed to evaluate whether the administration of lidocaine in continuous infusion during ERCP procedure reduces the consumption of propofol and the rate of complications in these patients.

Methods: 83 patients over 65-year old, ASA II-IV score, undergoing an ERCP procedure were randomized in two groups: lidocaine group (group L) who received 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine 1% and propofol 1mg/kg at induction and then 2 mg/kg lidocaine 1% in continuous infusion during the procedure and control group (group C) who received saline in the same amount as group L and propofol 1mg/kg. The consumption of propofol, intraprocedural complications, the time of awakening and recovery, the quality of postprocedural analgesia, the satisfaction of the endoscopist were registered.

Results: Propofol consumption was statistically significantly lower in group L compared to group C [135.37 (±43.23) vs. 214.88 (±51.83), p=0.001]. The same result was obtained related to the awakening time [2.85 (±1.50) vs. 5.38 (±1.36), p=0.001] and recovery time [23.90 (±12.66) vs. 26.17 (±12.41), p<0.001], the episodes of intraprocedural desaturation (p=0.001), the involuntary intraprocedural movements (p=0.001), the endoscopist's satisfaction (p=0.006). No differences were found in terms of post-procedure pain scores (p=0.54).

Conclusions: Lidocaine can be administered to reduce the need for propofol, faster awakening and lower intraprocedural complications in elderly patients undergoing the ERCP procedure.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年患者内窥镜逆行胰胆管造影的镇静作用——静脉输注利多卡因的效果。随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
背景:对伴有相关合并症的老年患者进行ERCP手术时,镇静可产生严重的并发症,包括麻醉物质引起的呼吸不稳定和血流动力学。在这项研究中,我们的目的是评估在ERCP过程中持续输注利多卡因是否减少了这些患者异丙酚的消耗和并发症的发生率。方法:将83例年龄在65岁以上、ASA II-IV分的ERCP患者随机分为两组:利多卡因组(L组)诱导时给予1.5 mg/kg利多卡因1%,异丙酚1mg/kg,术中持续输注利多卡因1% 2mg /kg;对照组(C组)给予与L组等量生理盐水,异丙酚1mg/kg。记录异丙酚用量、术中并发症、苏醒和恢复时间、术后镇痛质量和内镜医师满意度。结果:L组丙泊酚用量明显低于C组[135.37(±43.23)比214.88(±51.83),p=0.001]。苏醒时间[2.85(±1.50)vs. 5.38(±1.36),p=0.001]和恢复时间[23.90(±12.66)vs. 26.17(±12.41)]的结果相同。结论:老年ERCP患者给予利多卡因可减少异丙酚的需用,加快苏醒速度,降低术中并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases (formerly Romanian Journal of Gastroenterology) publishes papers reporting original clinical and scientific research, which are of a high standard and which contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology. The field comprises prevention, diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The journal also publishes reviews, editorials and short communications on those specific topics. Case reports will be accepted if of great interest and well investigated.
期刊最新文献
Normal Values of High Resolution Anorectal Manometry in 132 Romanian Healthy People Yoga Therapy in Functional Dyspepsia. A Narrative Review Burning mouth syndrome needs to consider the gut-brain axis from three types of pain: nociceptive, neuropathic, and nociplastic pain Clinical, Endoscopic, and Histopathologic Observations in Gastrointestinal Amyloidosis Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Quality in Italy: A Nationwide Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1