Strategies to encourage participation in debrief sessions with nursing students for whom English is an additional language: A qualitative study.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Contemporary Nurse Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.1080/10376178.2022.2123839
Caroline Havery
{"title":"Strategies to encourage participation in debrief sessions with nursing students for whom English is an additional language: A qualitative study.","authors":"Caroline Havery","doi":"10.1080/10376178.2022.2123839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>End-of-day debriefs are reported to offer students opportunities to reflect and consolidate learning. However, there is little evidence about how clinical facilitators encourage student participation that leads to refection and learning, particularly in debrief sessions with linguistically diverse students.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This research investigated how the pedagogic practices of clinical facilitators enabled or constrained student participation during debrief.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study used an ethnographic approach combined with linguistic analysis of audio recordings of debrief in two metropolitan hospitals in Australia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found that several key factors contributed to student participation during debrief. Factors included: establishing a space that offered visual and aural privacy; using strategies that encouraged student talk; and adopting roles of expert teacher, facilitator, clinical expert, and therapeutic agent.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Conducting debrief in appropriate settings and adopting strategies and roles that encourage student talk can lead to opportunities for students to reflect on their day, and for facilitators to make judgements about students' knowledge.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Facilitators can enable student participation by using spaces that offer physical and aural privacy for debrief, focusing on knowledge within students' scope of practice, and using communication strategies that encourage talk.</p>","PeriodicalId":55633,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Nurse","volume":"58 5-6","pages":"460-472"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Nurse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10376178.2022.2123839","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: End-of-day debriefs are reported to offer students opportunities to reflect and consolidate learning. However, there is little evidence about how clinical facilitators encourage student participation that leads to refection and learning, particularly in debrief sessions with linguistically diverse students.

Aim: This research investigated how the pedagogic practices of clinical facilitators enabled or constrained student participation during debrief.

Design: This study used an ethnographic approach combined with linguistic analysis of audio recordings of debrief in two metropolitan hospitals in Australia.

Results: The study found that several key factors contributed to student participation during debrief. Factors included: establishing a space that offered visual and aural privacy; using strategies that encouraged student talk; and adopting roles of expert teacher, facilitator, clinical expert, and therapeutic agent.

Conclusion: Conducting debrief in appropriate settings and adopting strategies and roles that encourage student talk can lead to opportunities for students to reflect on their day, and for facilitators to make judgements about students' knowledge.

Impact: Facilitators can enable student participation by using spaces that offer physical and aural privacy for debrief, focusing on knowledge within students' scope of practice, and using communication strategies that encourage talk.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鼓励英语为附加语言的护理学生参加汇报会议的策略:一项定性研究。
背景:据报道,每天结束的汇报为学生提供了反思和巩固学习的机会。然而,很少有证据表明临床辅导员如何鼓励学生参与,从而导致反思和学习,特别是在与不同语言的学生进行汇报时。目的:本研究探讨临床辅导员的教学实践如何促进或限制学生在述职时的参与。设计:本研究采用人种学方法结合语言分析,对澳大利亚两家大城市医院的汇报录音进行分析。结果:研究发现了几个影响学生参与述职的关键因素。因素包括:建立一个提供视觉和听觉隐私的空间;使用鼓励学生交谈的策略;扮演专家教师、引导者、临床专家、治疗剂等角色。结论:在适当的环境下进行汇报,采用鼓励学生发言的策略和角色,可以给学生带来反思一天的机会,也可以让辅导员对学生的知识做出判断。影响:辅导员可以通过使用提供物理和听觉隐私的空间来进行汇报,关注学生实践范围内的知识,以及使用鼓励交谈的沟通策略来促进学生的参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Contemporary Nurse
Contemporary Nurse 医学-护理
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
38
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Contemporary Nurse is an international peer-reviewed journal designed to increase nursing skills, knowledge and communication, assist in professional development and to enhance educational standards by publishing stimulating, informative and useful articles on a range of issues influencing professional nursing research, teaching and practice. Contemporary Nurse is a forum for nursing educators, researchers and professionals who require high-quality, peer-reviewed research on emerging research fronts, perspectives and protocols, community and family health, cross-cultural research, recruitment, retention, education, training and practitioner perspectives. Contemporary Nurse publishes original research articles, reviews and discussion papers.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing job satisfaction among advanced nurse practitioners: insights and reflections from Taiwan Special Issue: Advances in Frailty Science Special Issue: Quality Improvement Developing nursing interventions in Paediatric Emergence Delirium: a scoping review Integrating technology in aged care: challenges, opportunities, and a nursing lens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1